¹Aniceto B. Naval, Ph.D., ²Ritzcen A. Durango, Ph.D.

^1,2St. Michael’s College of Iligan City, Iligan City 9200, Philippines

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i02-15

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Engaged pedagogy through performative teaching emanates from a teaching philosophy that recognizes the importance of making teaching and learning processes into reality through actively engaging students. This study ascertained to develop and validate an instrument that measures performative teaching techniques. A review of relevant and recent literature on teaching practices was done which led to the writing of the items in the instrument evaluated by subject matter experts (SMEs). A total of 100 teachers participated in the initial test administration. The adequacy indicator of the sample ΚΜΟ=0.868 indicating that the sample data were enough for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of extracting factor loadings based on the eigenvalue greater than 1. Results yielded valid items and extracted four (4) factor loadings around .511 to .830 while Cronbach’s Alpha indicates the instrument is internally consistent. The development of the final instrument was based on the results of the evaluation of the instrument’s reliability and validity. For purposes of recognition, the instrument was named “Performative Teaching Inventory for Teachers ( PTI ).”

KEYWORDS:

Performative teaching inventory, instrument development , engaged pedagogy

REFERENCES
1) Alavi, M., Visentin, D. C., Thapa, D. K., Hunt, G. E., Watson, R., & Cleary, M. (2020). Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis in clinical studies: Which one should you use? In Journal of Advanced Nursing (Vol. 76, Issue 8, pp. 1886–1889). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14377

2) Archer, D. (2020). Understanding questions and answers in context: An argument for multi-channel analysis. Scandinavian Studies in Language, 11(1), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v11i1.121367

3) Beltran, R. S., Regala, R. M. P., & Bog-ot, J. P. T. (2018). Visual Modelling Approach (VMA) in Learning Fractions. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10, 56–62.

4) Che Md Ghazali, N. H., Mat Rabi, N., & Md Hassan, N. (2017). Development and validation of an inventory to evaluate the implementation of main educational elements in promoting higher-order thinking skills. Journal Of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 7(2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol7.no2.2.2017

5) Kochetkov, M. V. (2022). Traditional and adaptive learning paradigms as integral components of the innovation-oriented education of the future. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 58(4), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.4.2

6) Kolb, D. A. (1981). Experiential Learning Theory and The Learning Style Inventory: A Reply to Freedman and Stumpf. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1981.4287844, 6(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1981.4287844

7) Peterson, D., Micceri, T., & Othanel Smith, B. (1985). Measurement of teacher performance: A study in instrument development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(85)90030-7

8) Peterson, R. A. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Variance Accounted for and Factor Loadings in Exploratory Factor Analysis. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008191211004

9) Serdà, B. C., & Alsina, Á. (2018). Knowledge-transfer and self-directed methodologies in university students’ learning. Reflective Practice, 19(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1538947

10) Stes, A., de Maeyer, S., & van Petegem, P. (2010). Approaches to teaching in higher education: Validation of a Dutch version of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Learning Environments Research, 13(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9066-7

Volume 07 Issue 02 February 2024