Volume 07 Issue 02 February 2024
1Arifin, 2Hardilina, 3Ida Rochmawati, 4Achmad
1,2,3Public Administration Departement, Tanjungpura University, Indonesia
4Universitas Terbuka UPBJJ Pontianak, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i02-29Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Policies for handling stunting in the Sambas Regency area, especially in border areas, both at the formulation and implementation levels, face complex obstacles. Reconstructing policy strategies and their implementation by looking more deeply at the interactions between policy actors or what is visible in policy networks, in the short and long term can make a positive contribution to the development of programs in handling stunting. The research method used is a mixed method to look at network patterns and reconstruct them as well as describe detailed steps (strategies) for handling stunting. The results of the research show that there are two stakeholders or actors who have the most dominant role, namely having a large influence but low dependence, the Sajingan Besar Community Health Center and Pos Yandu, or the community group driving program activities in Kaliau Village. Meanwhile, stakeholders or actors who have dominant influence but still high dependency are Community Activity Groups in general and MSMEs (Small and Micro Enterprises). This shows that fewer stakeholders play a more dominant role, namely only 4 stakeholders compared to other actors. Therefore, strong role interaction between stakeholders is needed to increase the effectiveness of the strategies used to overcome the stunting problem.
KEYWORDS:Policy Strategy, Management Stunting, Sambas Regency
REFERENCES1) Akbar, G. G., Nurliawati, N., Muchtar, M., & Ramdhani, A. (2021). Retrospective Analysis of Work From Home for Civil Servants During The Covid- 19 Pandemic. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v17i2.811
2) Arifin, A., Budiman, R., & Martinus, M. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat melalui Pemanfaatan Danau Non-Produktif Menjadi Tambak Ikan. 6(1), 762–770. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v6i1.6643
3) Arifin, A., & Yuniarsih, R. (2022). Developing Border Area: A Study of the Village Internet Program in Kaliau Village, Sambas Regency. 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2022.061-03
4) Ariningsih, E., Susilowati, S. H., Saliem, H. P., & Agustian, A. (2021). Prospects and strategies for food exports from border areas: A case of West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 892(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/892/1/012085
5) Deri, P., Rekayasa, F., & Chairunnisa. (2021). Identifikasi Kondisi Terkini Plbn Aruk Kecamatan Sajingan Besar Kabupaten Sambas. Jurnal Untan, 1–8.
6) Fauzi, A. N., & Dewi Rostyaningsih. (2018). Analisis Peran Aktor Dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Semarang Smart City. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 7(4), 1–18. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jppmr/article/view/22052/20296
7) Febriyanto, A. D. K. (2016). Peran Aktor Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Retribusi Parkir Di Jalan Pandanaran. Administrasi Publik, 1–17.
8) Gurusinga, A. U., Dewi, N., & Rosnita, R. (2022). Analisis Prospektif Peremajaan Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis Guineensis Jacq) Pola Swadaya di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 18(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.20956/jsep.v18i1.19024
9) Hadi, M. D. S., Widodo, P., & Putro, R. W. (2020). Analisis dampak pandemi Covid 19 di Indonesia ditinjau dari sudut pandang keamanan Siber. Jurnal Kebangsaan.
10) Khairunisa. (2022). Analisis Peran Aktor Pengendali Kejahatan dan Pengaruh Super Controller dalam Penanganan Perdagangan Satwa Liar yang Dilindungi Di DKI Jakarta. 6, 47–65. https://doi.org/10.36080/djk.v6i1.1801
11) Lestari, A. W., & Firdausi, F. (2017). Peran pemerintah Kota Batu dalam implementasi kebijakan pembangunan pariwisata berdasarkan paradigma pembangunan berkelanjutan (sustainable development). Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 30(3), 260. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v30i32017.260-265
12) Luti, I., Hasanbasri, M., & Lazuardi, L. (2012). Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Meningkatkan Sistem Rujukan Kesehatan Daerah Kepulauan Di Kabupaten Lingga Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia, 01(01), 24–35.
13) Makahingide, R. (2021). Upaya Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Menangani Persoalan Di Wilayah Perbatasan Antara Pulau Marore Dan Philipina Selatan. Jurnal Politico, 10(2), 19–37.
14) Nopriani, M., Fauzi, A., & Nuva, N. (2022). Analisis Prospektif untuk Keberlanjutan Pengelolaan TPS 3R di Kota Pangkalpinang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(3), 13791–13808. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i3.4504
15) Pearson, M., Anthony, Z. B., & Buckley, N. A. (2010). Prospective policy analysis: How an epistemic community informed policymaking on intentional self poisoning in Sri Lanka. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-8-19
16) Peraturan Bupati No 32 Tahun 2017 Tentang Stunting, (2017).
17) Reeve, E., Thow, A. M., Namohunu, S., Bell, C., Lal, A., & Sacks, G. (2021). Action-oriented prospective policy analysis to inform the adoption of a fiscal policy to reduce diet-related disease in the Solomon Islands. Health Policy and Planning, 36(8), 1257–1268. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab031
18) Rochmawati, I., Rusdiono, R., & Arifin, A. (2022). The Involvement and Conflict of Authority of Actors Managing the Indonesia-East Malaysia Border Area. Journal of Governance, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i3.16714
19) Rosyadi, S., Setyoko, P. I., Kurniasih, D., Ramadhanti, W., Kusuma, A. S., & Atika, Z. R. (2021). Penguatan Kapasitas Peran Sosial Bumdes dalam Penanggulangan Dampak Ekonomi COVID-19. Wikrama Parahita: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.30656/jpmwp.v5i1.2554
20) Salaputa, I., Madani, M., & Prianto, A. L. (2013). Peran Aktor Dalam Penyusunan Agenda Kebijakan Pemekaran Wilayah Kecamatan Di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v3i1.56
21) Sandy, F. (2020). Analisis Peran Aktor dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Pembangunan Sanitasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP), 6(3), 415–422.
22) Tohardi, A. (2020). Model Penelitian Kebijakan Kualitatif ” Tohardi ”. JPASDEV: Journal of Public Administration and Sociology of Development, 1(1), 58–77. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jiapora
23) Ulum, S., Haryono, B. S., & Rozikin, M. (2011). Analisis Peran Multi Aktor dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Minapolitan Berbasis Sustainable Development. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 1(Anviromental sustainable development), 154–162.
24) Walker, M. (2010). A human development and capabilities “prospective analysis” of global higher education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003753257
25) Wardono, B., Muhartono, R., Hikmayani, Y., & Apriliani, T. (2019). ANALISIS PROSPEKTIF PERAN AKTOR DALAM STRATEGI FORMULASI ( Prospective Analysis of the Role of Actors for Fishery Development Formulation Strategies in the Natuna District). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 14(2), 179–1.
26) Wardono, B., Muhartono, R., Hikmayani, Y., Apriliani, T., & Hikmah, H. (2019). Analisis Prospektif Peran Aktor Dalam Strategi Formulasi Pembangunan Perikanan Di Kabupaten Natuna. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 14(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v14i2.8241
27) Wibowo, Y. (2010). Analisis Prospektif Strategi Pengembangan Daya Saing. Agrointek, 4(2), 104–113.
28) Yin, R. K. (2014). Design and Methods, Third Edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 5. In Sage Publications (pp. 1–181).