Volume 07 Issue 03 March 2024
1I Nyoman Sumardika, 2I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya, 3Ni Made Jaya Senastri
1,2,3Lecturers of Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i03-06Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study examines the Notary Deed on Transfer of Rights with Potential Conflicts. The potential for disputes over the transfer of rights agreement made before a Notary, starting from the beginning of the transfer of rights agreement has the potential to contain disputes, however, the complainants still ask to be made a deed by the Notary and one of the parties reneges on the consensus made and agreed before the Notary.The potential for the deed made before the Notary Public has the potential to contain disputes related to the Transfer of Civil Rights and Transition Civil Authority. The types of Deeds in question include: Deed of Power of Attorney / Power to Sell followed by Deed of Agreement / Binding of Sale and Purchase, Deed of Recognition of Debt with Guarantee followed by the preparation of the Deed of Binding Sale and Purchase and Power of Sale, Deed of Cancellation, Entry and Amendment of CV Deed, Lease Agreement, Power to Rent and Recognition of Debt with Collateral, and Deed of Will. Meanwhile, the deed related to the Transfer of Civil Authority is a stand-alone Power of Attorney Deed. The excesses of criminal acts in the implementation of the Notary office are very close to the crime of forgery of letters, because this is significant with the Notary's position as a General Official. Meanwhile, the provisions on Extortion, Embezzlement, Fraud, Land Seizure and Theft are not related to the capacity of Notaries as Public Officials but as private persons just like society in general. This condition requires a solution to anticipate the deed made by or before a Notary. This becomes increasingly relevant for practical needs because of differences in viewpoints and interests that imply a degradation of objectivity in assessing an authentic deed. Judgment no longer refers to the standard of authenticity of an authentic deed that clearly positive law has set it out. This condition should be a valuable lesson and experience by being a progressive Notary, to be part of the solution and not part of the problem.
KEYWORDS:Notary Deed, Transfer of Rights, Potential Conflict
REFERENCES1) Chazawi Adami, 2001, Kejahatan Terhadap Pemalsuan, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
2) Gidden, Anthony, 1971, New Rulesof Sociological Methode : A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, New York Basic Books, Inc Publisher.
3) Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 1990, Perkembangan Perjanjian, Makalah disampaikan pada : Seminar Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Perdata/Dagang, Kerjasama FH. UGM.- Konsorsium Ilmu Hukum Yogyakarta, 12-13 Maret.
4) Muhammad, Abdulkadir, 1990, Hukum Perdata, Alumni, Bandung.
5) Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, 1980, Asas-Asas Perjanjian, Sumur, Bandung.
6) Satrio, J., 2001, Perikatan, Perikatan Yang Lahir dari Perjanjian, Buku I, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
7) Setiawan, 1993, Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dan Kedudukan Yang Seimbang Dari Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian, Media Notariat, Majalah Tri Wulan No.28-29 Tahun VIII Juli-Oktober
8) ------------, 1999, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan, Putra Arbardin, Jakarta.
9) Soedjendro, J. Kartini, 2001, Tafsir Sosial Hukum PPAT-Notaris Ketika Menangani Perjanjian Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Berpotensi Konflik, Disertasi, Program Doktor (S-3) Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
10) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
11) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
12) Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 tentang Tugas dan Fungsi, Syarat dan Tata CaraPengangkatan dan Pemberhentian, Struktur Organisasi, Tata Kerja dan Anggaran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris,