Yaron Katz,

HIT – Holon Institute of Technology, Israel

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i04-66

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Political ideology is based on beliefs, values, and principles guiding the preferred form of government and societal organization. While providing coherence and direction for political parties, ideologies often clash with the pragmatic realities of governance. Practical politics prioritizes pragmatic considerations over ideological principles, focusing on achieving realistic goals through compromise and negotiation. This tension underscores the dynamic nature of political theory and practice, where ideological ideals must adapt to real-world complexities. The clash between ideological ideals and pragmatic necessities in governance underscores the dynamic nature of political theory and practice. Scholarly research explores this interplay, highlighting debates on the relationship between ideology and practical politics. The study highlights the complexity of navigating the interplay between ideological frameworks and practical considerations in political decision-making. It acknowledges the challenges inherent in reconciling abstract principles with the exigencies of governance. It analyses political ideology theories imperative for policymakers to balance ideological commitments and pragmatic policies. This research comprehensively explores theoretical approaches to the relationship between ideology and practical politics, shedding light on the ongoing discourse within political theory and its implications for effective governance.

REFERENCES
1) Baderin, Alice (2013). Two forms of realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory. Volume 13, Issue 2

2) Bhambra; Gurminder; and Margee, Victoria (2010). “Identity Politics and the Need for a ‘Tomorrow’,” Economic and Political Weekly, 45(15

3) Cukierman, Alex (2012). The Roles of Ideology, Institutions, Politics, and Economic Knowledge in Forecasting Macroeconomic Developments: Lessons from the Crisis. Economic Studies, Vol. 56, 4

4) Feldman, Stanley; and Johnston, Christopher. (2014). Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity. Political Psychology. Volume 35, Issue 3

5) Gjorshoski, Nikola (2016). The Ideological Specifics of the Variants of Contemporary Conservatism. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs. No. 1

6) Heywood, Andrew (2021). Political Ideologies\; An Introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing

7) Kirk, Russell (2023). The Politics of Prudence. Gateway

8) Leeper, Thomas J.; and Slothuus, Rune (2014). Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation. Advances in Political Psychology. Volume 35, Issue 1

9) March, Andrew F. (2010). What Is Comparative Political Theory? The Review of Politics. Vol. 71, No. 4

10) Pettit, Philip (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford Political Theory Series

11) Pettit, Philip (2011a). The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin. The University of Chicago Press Journals, Volume 121, Number 4

12) Pettit, Philip (2018). Freedom: psychological, ethical, and political. In: Exploring Republican Freedom. Routledge

13) Rectenwald, Michael (2018). “Social Justice” and Its Postmodern Parentage. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (4)

14) Rectenwald, Michael (2013). Secularism and the cultures of nineteenth-century scientific naturalism. The British Journal for the History of Science. Vol. 46, No. 2

15) Slothuus, Rune; and Bisgaard, Martin (2021). How Political Parties Shape Public Opinion in the Real World. American Journal of Political Science. Volume 65, Issue 4

16) Waldron, J. (2000). The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning: ``Rights'' versus ``Needs''. The Journal of Ethics 4

Volume 07 Issue 04 April 2024