Volume 07 Issue 05 May 2024
1Muhammad Kautzar Riski Saifulloh, 2Lego Karjoko, 3Hari Purwadi
1Master of Notary Student at the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.
2,3Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-05Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
In the debt and receivable agreement, a Power of Sale is usually also created, which sometimes gives rise to legal problems. This research aims to analyze the validity of the notarial power of attorney deed used as collateral for debts and receivables, as well as examine the civil responsibility of the Notary for the power of attorney deed made before him. The research method is normative juridical, which is analyzed qualitatively with deductive logic. The type of data used is secondary data. The results of this research are: first, The sale of collateral objects by creditors themselves can be carried out as long as the provisions of Article 20 paragraph (2) UUHT are met. selling the object of collateral rights, this agreement between the creditor and the debtor is an agreement agreed upon after a default by the debtor. In the event that the power of attorney deed that has been prepared by the creditor is signed simultaneously at the time of signing the credit agreement between the creditor and the debtor, then the power of sale deed is contrary to Articles 6 and 20 UUHT, so that such power of sale deed does not legally have any legal standing. Second, the Notary's responsibility for the deed of power of sale in a debt and receivable agreement made before him can be borne by the Notary if the error comes from the Notary, for example in the case that the author examined where Notary SN, in making the deed of power of sale, committed an unlawful act because he directed the debtor to sign the deed. which is still blank without explaining the purpose of the deed. So then the debtor is disadvantaged by the existence of the power of attorney deed, because by using the power of attorney deed, the creditor secretly transfers the debtor's collateral to a third party at a very low price, even though the debtor is not in default. In this case Notary SN can be burdened with civil liability, namely Unlawful Actions Article 1365 of the Civil Code.
KEYWORDS:Accounts Receivable, Liability, Notary, Power of Sale.
REFERENCES1) Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
2) Ammirudin. (2021). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
3) Arlina, N. (2020). Pengangkatan Notaris Pengganti dari Notaris yang Berstatus Terpidana (Studi Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 728/Pdt/P/2020/Pn. Sby). Jurnal Pendidikan Volume 4 Number 4, 2.
4) Bukit, J., Warka, M., & Nasution, K. (2018). Eksistensi Atas Keseimbangan pada Kontrak Konsumen di Indonesia. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 1 Number 1.
5) Carolin, V. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Secara Keperdataan Bagi Klien Notaris yang Mengalami Kerugian Akibat Diterbitkannya Akta Autentik yang Cacat Hukum oleh Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Volume 7 Number 1, 17.
6) Danim, S. (2002). Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
7) Firdaus, D. R. (2022). Akibat Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta yang Mengandung Unsur Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 77/Pdt.G/2020/PN SBY. Indonesian Notary Volume 4 Number 1, 244.
8) Hadid, U. M. (2019). Keabsahan Surat Kuasa Jual Berdasarkan Perjanjian Hutang Piutang yang Dibuat Secara Notariil Akta Dihadapan Notaris. Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law (IJoCL) Volume 1 Number 1, 68.
9) Harahap, M. Y. (2000). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
10) Harahap, N. P. (2011). Pemanggilan Notaris oleh Polri Berkaitan dengan Akta yang Dibuatnya. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.
11) Hernako, A. Y. (2011). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
12) Hidayat, R. R., Huda, M., & Adjie, H. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Atas Dasar Utang Piutang (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 347/Pdt.G/2020/PN Btm). Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora Volume 3 Number 2, 163.
13) Latumeten, P. E. (2011). Cacat Yuridis Akta Notaris dalam Peristiwa Hukum Konkrit dan Implikasi Hukumnya. Jakarta: Tuma Press.
14) Linati, A. (2022). Kuasa Menjual Dengan Kuasa Pengakuan Utang Sebagai Dasar Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Tanah (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1416 K/Pdt/2020). Indonesian Notary Volume 4 Number 1, 550.
15) Martono, K., & Sudiro, A. (2011). Hukum Angkutan Udara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2009. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
16) Setyawan, A. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Penggunaan Surat Kuasa Jual Terhadap Penjualan Objek Hak Tanggungan dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan Volume 4 Number 1, 10.
17) Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
18) Widijatmoko, M. J. (2012). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Otentik (Akta Notaris & Akta PPAT). Surakarta: UNS Press.