Volume 07 Issue 05 May 2024
1Vita Imam Matus Solekhah 2Heldy Vanni Alam, 3Sri Endang Saleh
1Master of Economics Education Student, Graduate School Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Jl. Jendral Sudirman No. 6 Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province Indonesia.
2,3Graduate School Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Jl. Jendral Sudirman Gorontalo City, Gorontalo Province Indonesia.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-60Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
People's consumption choices no longer reflect their ability to distinguish between urgent needs and less important wants. Consumption patterns can be recognized by cues evident in an individual's purchasing habits, like acquiring items or services solely for gift-giving purposes without considering their utility, or purchasing based solely on appealing packaging that distinguishes them from similar products. Parents entrust students with the responsibility of managing their finances, granting them the freedom to spend without constant supervision. Consequently, students may exhibit less rational spending habits, indicating a departure from prioritized consumption choices. Students, as members of society, also engage in consumption behaviors which correlates with modernity, lifestyle and economic literacy. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the influence of modernity, lifestyle, economic literacy on consumptive behavior in undergraduate students of Economics Education at Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. This research uses quantitative methods with data collection techniques using questionnaires with a sample of 144 students. Data analysis using Structural Equation Models (SEM) based on Partial Least Square (PLS) using the SmartPLS version 3.0 application. The results showed that modernity has an influence on lifestyle, modernity has no influence on economic literacy, lifestyle has an influence on economic literacy, modernity has an influence on consumptive behavior, lifestyle has an influence on consumptive behavior, economic literacy has an influence on consumptive behavior, modernity, lifestyle and economic literacy have an influence on the consumptive behavior of UNG Economics Education undergraduate students.
KEYWORDS:Modernity, Lifestyle, Economic Literacy, Consumptive Behavior, SEM-PLS.
REFERENCES1) Agusti, Ivo Selvia. & Gultom, Nining Dewanti. (2019). Pengaruh literasi ekonomi dan modernitas terhadap perilaku konsumtif mahasiswa, 8(2), 102-107.
2) Agustin, R. (2021). Pengaruh literasi ekonomi, konformitas teman sebaya, dan modernitas terhadap perilaku konsumtif mahasiswa IAIN Ponorogo. Diakses darihttp://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/13293/1/210717133_RISKA%20APRILYA_EKONOMI%20SYARIAH.pdf
3) Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intentions To Actions : A Theory Of Planned Behavior. Action Control”. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 11-39.
4) Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory Of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol 50, pp. 179-211.
5) Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Second Edition. USA : Open University Press Book.
6) Ajzen, Icek. (2006) Icek Ajzen Professor of Psychology University Massachusettss. [online]. Diakses pada tanggal 26 April 2024 dari http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/index.html
7) Alfeus Manuntung, 2018. Buku Terapi Perilaku Kognitif pada Pasien Hipertensi. Malang : Wineka Media.
8) Arikunto, S.(2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian dan Penilaian Program. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
9) Atmoko Dwi, & Bambang. (2012). Instagram Handbook. Media Kita.
10) Chrisnawati, D., & Sri Muliati Abdullah. 2011. Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Konsumtif Remaja Terhadap Pakaian (Studi Kasus Pada Remaja Berstatus Sosial Ekonomi Rendah). Jurnal Spirits Vol 2 No. 1. Diterbitkan online (https://docplayer.info/61846845-Faktor-faktor-yang-mempengaruhi-perilaku-konsumtif-remaja-terhadap-pakaian-studi-kasus-pada-remaja-berstatus-sosial-ekonomi-rendah.html). Diakses 01 Mei 2024
11) Ferdinand, Augusty. 2000. Structural Equation Modelling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Program Magister Manajemen Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
12) Fiqriyah, Rizky, Hari Wahyono dan Ro’ufah Inayati. 2016. Pengaruh Pengelolaan Uang Saku, Modernitas, Kecerdasan Emosional, dan Pemahaman Dasar Ekonomi Terhadap Rasionalias Perilaku Konsumsi Siswa Kelas X IIS MAN 1 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Volume 9 Nomor 1-10. Diterbitkan online (http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpe/article/view/1617/900). Diakses 07 Mei 2024
13) Ghozali , Imam. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Edisi 8. Semarang: Badan Penerbit universitas Diponegoro, 2013.
14) Ghozali, I. Latan, H. 2012. Partial Least Square : Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Smart PLS 2.0 M3. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Ghozali, Imam.
15) Gitaroso, Muh. “Tasawuf Dan Modernitas (Mengikis Kesalahpahaman Masyarakat Awam Terhadap Tasawuf).” Jurnal IAIN Pontianak. Vol 10 (1)
16) Handayani, S., Patricia, N. L. 2014. Pengaruh Gaya Hidup Hedonis terhadap Perilaku Konsumtif Pada Pramugari Maskapai Penerbangan “X” (Versi Elektronik). Jurnal Psikologi, Volume 2 Nomor 1. Diterbitkan online (https://www.neliti.com/publications/127078/pengaruh-gaya-hidup-hedonis-terhadap-perilaku-konsumtif-pada-pramugari-maskapai). Diakses 07 Mei 2024.
17) Haryono, Sigit. 2011. Pengaruh Gaya Hidup Terhadap Consumer Ethnocentrism (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Di Yogyakarta). Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, Vol. 3 No. 2. Diterbitkan online (https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bisma/article/view/2855). Diakses 07 Mei 2024.
18) Huey, L. S., & Yazdanifard, R. (2014). How Instagram can be used as a tool in social network marketing. Center for Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU), 7(4), 122–124.
19) Keller, Kevin Lane dan Philip Kotler. Manajemen Pemasaran. terj. Bob Sabran. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, 2009.
20) Liliweri. (2017). Komunikasi Antar Personal
21) Martono, Nanang. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Analisis isi dan Analisis Data Sekunder. Cet. 4; Jakarta, 2014.
22) Mercan, N., Kahya, V., Alamur, B. 2014. A Research Regarding To Relationship Between Economic Literacy And Consumer Preferences In Knowledge Economy. European Journal of Research on Education. Special Issue 6. Diterbitkan online (https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31332062/PORTEKIZ_KONGRE.doc). Diakses 07 Mei 2024.
23) Muhammad. Metodologi Penelitian Ekonomi Islam Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta:2008 hal 103
24) Muhammad, Syahril. (2013). Masyarakat Ternate : Pergaulatan Tradisi dan Modernitas. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
25) Muniarti, M. P. et al. 2013. Alat-Alat Pengujian Hipotesis. Semarang: Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.
26) Murtianingsih, Endah. “Pengaruh Literasi Ekonomi Siswa, Hasil Belajar Ekonomi, Dan Teman Sebaya Terhadap Perilaku Konsumsi Siswa SMP Negeri Di Surabaya Barat.” Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 5 (2017).
27) Murti dkk. (2022). The influence of family economic education, lifestyle on consumption behavior through economic literacy in FEB UM students, 2(3), 912-920.
28) Musfar, T. F., & Hasanuddin, R. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Segmentasi Gaya Hidup terhadap Keputusan Penggunaan dan Kepuasan Konsumen Jasa Simply Fresh Laundry di Kota Pekanbaru (pp. 234–240). Riau University.
29) Nasrullah, & Ruli. (2015). Media Sosial Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya dan Sosioteknologi. Simniosa Rekatama Media.
30) Opietha, Nienda Tasya. (2022). Pengaruh modernisasi terhadap gaya hidup remaja. Pontianak : Institut Agama Islam Negeri.
31) Pandey, Chanchala, and S.B. Bhattacharya. 2012. “ Economic Literacy of Senior Secondary School Teacher : A Field Study,” Journal of all India Association for EducationalResearch24(1):1-16 www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wje/article/download/6193/3705
32) Pariwang, Samsul. 2018. Modernitas dan Perilaku Konsumtif Mahasiswa Unismuh Makassar. Thesis. Makasar. Diterbitkan online (http://eprints.unm.ac.id/11468/). Diakses 07 Mei 2024.
33) Patricia, N. L., & Handayani, S. (2014). Pengaruh gaya hidup hedonis terhadap perilaku konsumtif pada pramugari maskapai penerbangan “X.” Jurnal Psikologi Esa Unggul, 12(01), 127078.
34) Pulungan, D. R., & Febriaty, H. (2018). Pengaruh gaya hidup dan literasi keuangan terhadap perilaku konsumtif mahasiswa. Jurnal Riset Sains Manajemen, 2(3), 103–110.
35) Rangga dkk. (2022). The influence of family economic education, self control, and individual modernity on consumptive behavior through financial literacy in bachelor students of the faculty of economics and business, universitas Negeri Malang class of 2020, 1(3), 66-79.
36) Risnawati, Sri Umi Mintarti W, & Cipto Wardoyo. (2018). Pengaruh Pendidikan ekonomi keluarga, gaya hidup, modernitas individu dan literasi ekonomi terhadap perilaku konsumtif siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(4), 430-436.
37) Sina, Peter Garlans. 2012. “Analisis Literasi Ekonomi.” Jurnal Economia 8(2) : 135-43. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/economia/article/view/1223.
38) Sudjana. Metode Statistik .PT. Tarsito, Bandung, 2005.
39) Solihat, Ai Nur, & Syamsudin Arnasik. (2018). Pengaruh literasi ekonomi terhadap perilaku konsumtif mahasiswa jurusan Pendidikan ekonomi Universitas Siliwangi. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1). 2549-2284.
40) Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Cet 20; Bandung: Alfabet, 2011.
41) Sumartono. Terperangkap dalam Iklan: Menerobos Imbas Pesan Iklan Televisi. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2002
42) Syofian Siregar. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Perhitungan Manual dan SPSS. Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta: 2013.
43) Sztompka, Piotr. 2007. Sosiologi perubahan sosial. Jakarta : Prenada
44) Ulfah dkk. (2022). Pengaruh modernitas dan gaya hidup terhadap perilaku konsumsi mahasiswa, 14(2), 237-245.
45) Ulum, Bahrul. (2023). Pengaruh gaya hidup, literasi ekonomi, dan modernitas terhadap rasionalitas konsumsi mahasiswa. Jurnal keislaman dan ilmu Pendidikan, 5 (1), 149-164.
46) Wuryanto, B. (2007). Analisis faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja word-of-mouth marketing (WoM). Diakses dari https://repofeb.undip.ac.id/8554/1/1.T-%20Cover-%20C4A006011.pdf
47) Yusuf, Muri. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Gabungan. Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta: 2014.