Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2024
1Mardika Prawestri, 2Meika Kurnia Puji Rahayu, 3Ika Nurul Qamari
1,2,3Master of Management, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i06-106Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Objective: This paper aims to identify research trends on the influence of leadership style in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 on innovation work behaviour globally.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this study is qualitative research with bibliometric analysis. The author used the Scopus database to collect empirical evidence with the keywords "innovative work behaviour" and "leadership". The data found were 189 documents obtained and analysed from 2019-2023. This dataset was converted to RIS format and imported for bibliometric analysis using VOSviwer. The analysis included publication distribution year, country, keywords and authors.
Findings: The findings of this study are the need for elaboration on the influence of leadership styles in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 on innovative work behaviour. Future research topics on leadership styles that provide great opportunities for further study in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 are authentic leadership, digital leadership, self-leadership, and leader-member exchange.
Research limitations/implications: This study only uses data from the Scopus database.
Originality/Value: This paper reveals research trends on leadership style and innovation work behaviour over the past 5 years (2019-2023). The results may help researchers or scholars to understand further research opportunities with the topic. This article may also provide an alternative approach to conducting literature reviews with computer-aided analysis programmes.
KEYWORDS:Innovation Work Behaviour, Leadership, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSViwer
REFERENCES1) Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K. A., & Farao, C. (2022). Inclusive leadership and extrarole behaviors in higher education: does organizational learning mediate the relationship? International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 397418.
2) Adekanmbi, F. P., & Ukpere, W. (2023). The impact of innovative work behavior, perceived Leadership 4.0, and corporate social responsibility on sustaining banking industry performance in Nigeria within the 4IR Era. Banks and bank systems, 18(4), 1-11.
3) Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383–395.
4) Alwi, Syafarudin. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Strategi Keunggulan Kompetitif. Edisi Kedua. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
5) Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: Astate-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework.Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
6) Aslan, H. (2019). Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support in Inclusive Leadership’S Effect on Innovative Work Behavior. Business Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2945–2963.
7) Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (2014). Super-flexibility for knowledge enterprises: a toolkit for dynamic adaptation. Springer.
8) Bai, Y., Wang, Z., Alam, M., Gul, F., & Wang, Y. (2022). The impact of authentic leadership on innovative work behavior: Mediating roles of proactive personality and employee engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 879176.
9) Bevz, A. V., & Kramarenko, N. M. (2020). Formation of technological competence during physical training. Innovate Pedagogy, 1, 28–31.
10) Brixner, C., Isaak, P., Mochi, S., Ozono, M., Suárez, D., & Yoguel, G. (2020). Back to the future. Is industry 4.0 a new tecno-organizational paradigm? Implications for Latin American countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(7), 705-719.
11) Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N., & Bossink, B. A. (2018). Servant leadership and innovative work behavior in Chinese high-tech firms: A moderated mediation model of meaningful work and job autonomy. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 386211.
12) Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N., & Bossink, B. A. (2019). Does entrepreneurial leadership foster creativity among employees and teams? The mediating role of creative efficacy beliefs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 203-217.
13) Carton, A. M., Murphy, C., & Clark, J. R. (2014). A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1544-1570.
14) Črešnar, R., & Nedelko, Z. (2020). Understanding future leaders: How are personal values of generations Y and Z tailored to leadership in industry 4.0?. Sustainability, 12(11), 4417.
15) Daft, R. (2014), New Era Management, 11th ed., Cengage Learning, Florence, US.
16) De Jong, J., &Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and innovation management, 19(1), 23-36.
17) De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and innovation management, 23(3), 318-330.
18) Durrah, O., & Kahwaji, A. (2023). Chameleon leadership and innovative behavior in the health sector: The mediation role of job security. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 35(2), 247-265.
19) Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible Industry 4.0: a scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Procedia CiRp, 54, 13-18.
20) Etikariena, A. (2020). Peran gaya kepemimpinan pada perilaku kerja inovatif karyawan pada organisasi berbasis teknologi digital. Ecopsy, 7(1), 375365.
21) Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The leadership quarterly, 30(1), 111-132.
22) Frislia, E., & Handoyo, S. (2020). The role of self-construal and goal orientation on employee innovative work behavior. Jurnal Psikologi, 19(3), 233-245.
23) Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhai, X., He, Y., Chen, R., Zhou, J., ... & Wang, Q. (2017). Publication trends of research on diabetes mellitus and T cells (1997–2016): A 20-year bibliometric study. PloS one, 12(9), e0184869.
24) Gelaidan, H. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2023). Servant and authentic leadership as drivers of innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management.
25) Grošelj, M., Černe, M., Penger, S., & Grah, B. (2020). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 677-706.
26) Gupta, V., Singh, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2017). The relationships between leadership, work engagement and employee innovative performance: Empirical evidence from the Indian R&D context. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(07), 1750055.
27) Hutagalung, L., Purwanto, A., & Prasetya, A. B. (2020). The Five Leadership Style in Time of Pandemic Covid-19 throughout Industrial Revolution 4.0 as compared to Humane Leadership. International Journal of Social, Policy and Law, 1(1), 79-87.
28) Iqbal, A., Ahmad, M. S., & Nazir, T. (2023). Does servant leadership predict innovative behaviour above and beyond transformational leadership? Examining the role of affective commitment and creative selfefficacy. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 34-51.
29) Jan, G., Mohamed Zainal, S. R., & Panezai, B. A. (2022). Service innovative work behavior in the hotel firms: The role of servant leadership and harmonious passion. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(5), 646662.
30) Jawad, M., Naz, M., & Rizwan, S. (2023). Leadership support, innovative work behavior, employee work engagement, and corporate reputation: Examining the effect of female in not government organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 708-719.
31) Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., & Islam, T. (2021). Leading the innovation: role of trust and job crafting as sequential mediators relating servant leadership and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1547-1568.
32) Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Ahmed, S. S., & Islam, T. (2023). Speak up to speed up innovation: servant leadership triggered innovative work behavior mediated through voice behavior. International Journal of Innovation Science.
33) Khattak, S. I., Khan, M. A., Ali, M. I., Khan, H. G. A., & Saeed, I. (2023). Relationship Between Servant Leadership, Leader-Member-Exchange, Organization Learning and Innovative Work Behavior: Evidence From High-Tech Firms. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231212267.Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
34) Kousina, E., & Voudouris, I. (2023). The ambidextrous leadership‐innovative work behavior relationship in the public sector: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1478-1495.
35) Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 79-102.
36) Kulsum, U., Nurmandi, A., Muallidin, I., Loilatu, M. J., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of open government: Study on Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 133-43.
37) Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2020). Servant leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 144.
38) Liu, S., Wang, X., Collins, C., Dou, W., Ouyang, F., El-Assady, M., ... & Keim, D. A. (2018). Bridging text visualization and mining: A task-driven survey. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 25(7), 2482-2504.
39) Lv, M., Jiang, S. M., Chen, H., & Zhang, S. X. (2022). Authentic leadership and innovation behaviour among nurses in China: A mediation model of work engagement. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(7), 2670-2680.
40) Mahmood, M., Uddin, M. A., & Fan, L. (2019). The influence of transformational leadership on employees’ creative process engagement: A multi-level analysis. Management Decision, 57(3), 741-764.
41) Manuati Dewi, I., Ayu, G., Riana, I. G., Suparna, G., & Surya, I. B. K. (2023). The Role of Authentic Leadership in Fostering Work Engagement and Innovative Behavior in The Creative Industry. Quality-Access to Success, 24(197).
42) Miron-Spektor, Ella, Miriam Erez, and Eitan Naveh. (2011). “The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-to-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox.” Academy of Management Journal 54(4): 740–60.
43) Murdiastuti, H., Suhariadi, F., & Sugiarti, R. (2021). Perilaku inovatif aparatur sipil negara: sebuah studi pustaka. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen PNS, 15(2 November), 69-78.
44) Nawawi, Hadari. (2003). Kepemimpinan Mengefektifkan Organisasi. Gajah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta
45) Nurmandi, A., Kurniawan, D., Misran, & Salahudin. (2021). A meta-analysis of big data security: how the government formulates a model of public information and security assurance into big data. In HCI International 2021-Late Breaking Posters: 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 23 (pp. 472-479). Springer International Publishing.
46) Pratiwi, B. R., & Parahyanti, E. (2022). Peran leader member exchange (LMX), kepribadian openness to experiences, dan harmonious passion dalam membentuk perilaku kerja yang inovatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 10(1), 17-29.
47) Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Hartuti, H., Setiana, Y. N., & Fahmi, K. (2021). Effect of psychological capital and authentic leadership on innovation work behavior. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(1), 1-13.
48) Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Sijabat, R., & Bernarto, I. (2021). The role of transformational leadership, organizational citizenship behaviour, innovative work behaviour, quality work life, digital transformation and leader member exchange on universities performance. Linguistica Antverpiensia.
49) Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Bañón-Gomis, A. (2017). The negative impact of chameleoninducing personalities on employees' ethical work intentions: The mediating role of Machiavellianism. European Management Journal, 35(1), 102-115.
50) Sanda, A., & Arthur, N. A. D. (2017). Relational impact of authentic and transactional leadership styles on employee creativity: The role of work-related flow and climate for innovation. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 8(3), 274-295.
51) Sanga, B., & Aziakpono, M. (2023). FinTech and SMEs financing: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Digital Business, 100067.
52) Sembiring, M. N. B. (2023). Pengaruh Servant Leadership Terhadap Innovative Work Behavior Dengan Creative Self-Efficacy Dan Perceived Organizational Support Sebagai Variabel Pemediasi (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta).
53) Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., & Ting, H. (2023). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & Quantity, 57(Suppl 4), 707-721.
54) Škerlavaj, M., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., Nerstad, C. G., & Su, C. (2019). Riding two horses at once: The combined roles of mastery and performance climates in implementing creative ideas. European Management Review, 16(2), 285-302.
55) Usmanova, K., Wang, D., Sumarliah, E., Khan, S. Z., Khan, S. U., & Younas, A. (2023). Spiritual leadership as a pathway toward innovative work behavior via knowledge sharing self-efficacy: moderating role of innovation climate. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(6), 12501270.
56) Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Ren, S., Collins, N., Cai, S., & Rowley, C. (2023). Exploitative leadership and employee innovative behaviour in China: a moderated mediation framework. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(3), 570-587.
57) Williams, J. A., Roberts, C., & Bosselman, R. (2011). Youth sports and the emergence of chameleon leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(3), 6-12.
58) Xu, B. D., Zhao, S. K., Li, C. R., & Lin, C. J. (2017). Authentic leadership and employee creativity: testing the multilevel mediation model. Leadership & organization development journal, 38(3), 482-498.
59) Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 87(4), 813-820.
60) Zeng, J., & Xu, G. (2020). How servant leadership motivates innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4753.