Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2024
1Eko Puspitono, 2T. Gayus Lumbuun
1Student of the Doctor of Law Program at Krisnadwipayana University, Jakarta
2Professor of Law at Krisnadwipayana University, Jakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i06-33Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Corruption is a criminal act classified as White-Collar Crime, which can only be committed by people who have inherent authority because of their position or power in an organization and/or in a government system. The research method was carried out using an analytical approach, namely knowing the meaning contained in the terms used in the laws and regulations related to Justice Collaborator, as well as knowing their application in practice, which is also closely related to the systematic review aspect of the relevant laws and regulations, by conducting technical studies. The second approach taken is the statutory regulations approach considering that this research will examine various statutory regulations related to Justice Collaborator. The respondents in this research are law lecturers, law faculty deans, criminal law lecturers, prosecutors, judges, lawyers, and students and related institutions. The results of research on justice collaborators related to Law No. 13 of 2006 which has been changed to Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Witness and Victim Protection (W&V Protection), apparently do not protect against the risk of losing their job for Justice Collaborators. The results of the research are very useful for the regulation and implementation of justice collaborators in disclosing criminal acts of corruption, namely that justice collaborators are very important and needed in disclosing criminal acts of corruption. The Corruption Court can uncover criminal acts of corruption quickly and precisely which will have an impact on saving costs, time, energy, and thought. Still, the existence of a justice collaborator cannot be sovereign because it will result in dependence on law enforcement officials. in uncovering criminal acts of corruption with the information provided. The knowledge of law enforcers must also be increased, especially in the cybercrime field, so it is hoped that there will be ideal regulation and implementation in Indonesia.
KEYWORDS:witnesses, protection, justice collaborators.
REFERENCES1) Abdul Muis BJ, (2020). Pemberantasan Korupsi, Pustaka Reka Cipta, Bandung
2) Adami Chazawi, (2017). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Media Nusa Creative, Malang.
3) Barda Nawawi Arief, (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru), Kencana, Jakarta.
4) Burt Galaway and Joe Hudson, (1990). Criminal Justice, Restitution and Reconciliation. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press, New York.
5) Erianto Effendi, (2013). Peran Saksi dan Pelaporan Tipikor serta Jaminan Perlindungan dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Perlindungan, Volume 2 No. 1, 2013.
6) Firman Wijaya, (2012). Justice Collaborator Dalam Perspektif Hukum, Penaku, Jakarta.
7) Hans Kelsen. (2021), Theory about Law (Nomostatics and Nomodinamics), Kon Press. Jakarta.
8) Indriyanto Seno Adji, (2008). Korupsi Kebijakan Aparatur Negara dan Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.
9) Indriyanto Seno Adji. (2014). Korupsi Kebijakan Aparatur Negara dan Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.
10) Jeremy Pope, (2016). Strategi Memberantas Korupsi, Terjemahan edisi ke-2, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
11) Jupri, Suardi Rais (2021), Hukum Pidana Korupsi, teori. Praktik dan Perkembangannya, Setara Press, Malang
12) Lies Sulistiani dan Widiyanto (Editor), (2011). Memahami Whistleblower, Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK), Jakarta.
13) Mahrus AH, (2012). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Cetakan. Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
14) Malik Rustam. (2017). Politik Anti Korupsi di Indonesia, LP3ES, Jakarta
15) Miko Susanto Ginting, (2013). Aksentuasi Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dalam RKUHAP, Jurnal LPSK Edisi 3 Vol. 1, 2013.
16) Nur Basuki Minamo, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam nifiaivhmn Ki'titnifian Daeruh, Cetk. Kedua, Lahshang Mediatama, Yogyakarta.
17) Nur Basuki Minamo, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam nifiaivhmn Ki'titnifian Daeruh, Lahshang Mediatama, Yogyakarta.
18) Pete Earley dan Gerald Shur, Witsec, (2006). Pengalaman Program Perlindungan Saksi Federal AS.
19) Prilian Cahyani & Brahma Astagiri, (2013). Pentingnya Peran LPSK dalam Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator, Jurnal LPSK Edisi 3 Vol. 1, Tahun 2013.
20) Quentin Dempster, (2006). Whistleblower (Pengungkapan Fakta), Elsam Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat.
21) Richard A. Bierschbach, (2012). “Overenforcement”, Georgetown Law Journal, No. 93, 2012.
22) Robert Cooter & Thomas Ulen, (2000). Law and Economics, Edisi Ketiga, Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc, Amerika Serikat.
23) Romli Atmasasmita, (2011). Sistim Peradilan Kontemporer, Kencana , Rawamangun Jakarta.
24) Supriadi Widodo Eddyono, (2011). “Prospek Perlindungan Justice Collaborator di Indonesia Perbandingannya di Amerika dan Eropa”. Jurnal Perlindungan, Vol 1 No.1.2011.
25) Suwarsono Muhamad, (2016), Group Bisnis, Makelar Kasus dan KPK, UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.
26) Velinka Grzdani dan Ute Karlavaris Bremer, (2007). A Written Word From Women’s Prison in The Function Of Resocialization, Laporan Hasil Penelitian, University in Rijeka, Croatia, 2007.
27) William L. Bames Jr. (1999). “Revenge on Utilitarianism: Renouncing A Comprehensive Economics Theory of crime and Punishment". Indiana Law Journal.
Article:
1) Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.
2) Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 tentang Perlakuan Bagi Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) di dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Tertentu.