Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
1Indra Rivani, 2Dewi Astutty Mochtar, 3Diah Aju W.
1,2,3Master of Law Study Program Postgraduate Program at Merdeka University, Malang, Indonesia Terusan Dieng Number 62-64 Malang 65146
Corresponding Author: Mohammad Ghufron AZ
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-35Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
In civil procedural law in Indonesia, it is known that there are five types of evidence as regulated in Article 164 HIR/284 RBG, namely letters, witnesses, confessions, oaths and judges' allegations. The letters referred to in the first form of evidence are letters that are signed and contain legal acts. However, a letter that can be strong evidence is an authentic deed, namely a letter made by or before a notary. From here, problems arise regarding the evidentiary strength of electronic contracts if a dispute occurs between the parties. The problems that will be discussed in this research are regarding the form and validity of electronic agreements in the paylater feature in Indonesia and the evidentiary strength of electronic agreements in the paylater feature when a dispute occurs. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical. The results of this research are that the electronic contract agreement process and conventional contracts have similarities, what differentiates the two contracts is that electronic contracts are carried out without face to face and do not need to meet in person so that the electronic contract agreement process occurs more quickly, easily and efficient. Electronic contracts with Paylater are valid because they fulfill the legal requirements for an agreement based on Article 1320. Apart from that, if we examine the electronic contract, it also complies with the provisions regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The evidentiary status of electronic evidence in civil cases in court is as valid evidence. The presence of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, as a form of confirmation of the recognition of electronic information and/or documents as legally valid evidence. As long as the information and/or electronic documents included can be accessed, displayed, their integrity is guaranteed, and can be accounted for so that they can explain a situation or event related to the dispute that occurred.
KEYWORDS:Agreement, Electronics, Loans.
REFERENCES1) Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Mandar Maju
2) Cita Yustisia Sefiani, 2013. Buku Pintar Bisnis Online dan Transaksi Elektronik, Jakarta; Gramedia Pustaka Utama
3) Dikdik M. Arief Mansur dan Elisatris Gultom, 2005. Cyber Law-Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi, Bandung: Refika Aditama
4) Gunawan Wijaja dan Ahmad Yani, 2003. Hukum tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
5) Hermansyah, 2012. Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia Edisi 2, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
6) Kartini Muljadi dan Gunawan Widjaja, 2003. Perikatan Pada Umumnya, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
7) M. Natsir Asnawi, 2013. Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Indonesia: Kajian Kontekstual Mengenai Sistem, Asas, Prinsip, Pembebanan, dan Standar Pembuktian, Yogyakarta; UII Press
8) Munir Fuady, 2012. Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana dan Perdata), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
9) Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2006. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media
10) R.Soebekti, 1992. Aneka Perjanjian, Bandung: Citra Aditya, Bandung
11) R.Subekti, 1974. Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta:.Internusa
12) R.Subekti, 1979. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta:.Intermesa
13) Rr. Retno Rizki Dini Yuliana, 2018. Sinergi Lembaga Teknologi Finansial dan Koperasi dalam Pemanfaatan Teknologi Finansial oleh Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah di ITB, Bandung: Pusat Penelitian Ekonomi, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
14) Salim HS, 2006. Hukum Kontrak; Teori dan Tekhnik Penyusunan Kontrak, Jakarta; Sinar Grafika
15) Satjipto Rahardjo, 2003. Sisi-Sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara
16) Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2009. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta:.Raja Grafindo Persada,
17) Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1996. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Yogyakarta: Liberty
18) Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1981. Hukum Perdata Tentang Persetujuan-Persetujuan Tertentu, Jakarta: Sumur Bandung
19) Yapiter Marpi, 2020. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen atas Keabsahan Kontrak Elektronik dalam Transaksi E-Commerce” , Jakarta; Zona Media Mandiri
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
1) Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata;
2) Undang- undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang- undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
3) Undang- undang Nomor 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
4) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik
5) Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi.
6) Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan.
7) Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 13/SEOJK.07/2014 tentang Perjanjian Baku.
JOURNAL
1) vBayu Novendra dan Sarah Safira Aulianisa, “Konsep dan Perbandingan Buy Now, Pay Later dengan Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia: Sebuah Keniscayaan di Era Digital dan Teknologi” Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 9 Nomor 2, Agustus 2020
2) Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, E-Commerce : Tinjauan Dari Hukum Kontrak Indonesia, Volume 12, Jakarta, 2001
3) Novi Ratna Sari, Komparasi Syarat Sah Perjanjian Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam, Journal Repertorium Volume IV Nomor 2, 2017
4) Ridwan Khairandy, Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak Sebagai Antisipasi Transaksi Elektronic Commerce, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, vol.16, 2001
5) Roberto Aaron, Electronic commerce :Enablers and Implications, IEEE Communication Magazine, 1999
6) Wahyu Suwena Putri dan Nyoman Budiana, Keabsahan Kontrak Elektronik dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Ditinjau dari Hukum Perikatan, Jurnal Analisis Hukum, Volume 1 Nomor 2, 2018
INTERNET
1) Merisa Irma, Teori Pembuktian dan Alat-alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata, diakses dari https://merisaicha23.wordpress.com/2014/05/15/teori-pembuktian-dan-alat-alat-bukti-dalam-hukum-acara-perdata/
2) Bank Indonesia, https://www.bi.go.id/id/edukasi/Pages/mengenal-Financial-Teknologi.aspx
3) Sintha Rosse, Apa itu Fintech dan Jenis Startup di Indonesia,https://www.duniafintech.com/apa-itufintech/