Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
1Anisa Indigovera Wargoputri, 2Rr. Sri Handari Wahyuningsih, 3Arni Surwanti
1,2,3Master of Management, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-48Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research is to explore and analyze research trend on perceived organizational support and performance using the Scopus database. A literature review was used in this study by conducting a bibliometric analysis approach with VOSViewer software to visualize the bibliometric network in the last ten years. This research approach carried out bibliographical analysis by taking the Scopus database based on the keyword “perceived organizational support” and “performance”. Then filtering research articles was carried out in the 2013 – 2023 period. Publications according to keywords initially amounted to 637 articles, after which 387 articles were filtered. Perceived organizational support and performance are interconnected topics. The development of perceived organizational support and performance has led to an increase in the number of publications by year with peak point in 2023. China is noted as the leading country in contributing publication. The most affiliate was from University of Houston. The most prominent author is Eisenberger with remarkable 8 publications and his publication have been cited in 961 documents. International Journal of Human Resource Management contributed regularly based on publication by source. These publications were published in the subject area Business, Management, and Accounting (35.3%). Analysis using VOSViewer produces network, overlay, and density visualization of co-occurrence by keyword revealed 78 items divided into 7 clusters marked with different color. The interrated factor include human resource management support, engagement, self efficacy, organization, etc. Thus, additional research could be interesting.
KEYWORDS:Bibliometric, Perceived Organizational Support, Performance, Scopus, VOSViewer
REFERENCES1) Yang H, van Rijn MB, Sanders K. Perceived organizational support and knowledge sharing: employees’ self-construal matters. Int J Hum Resour Manag [Internet]. 2020;31(17):2217–37. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1443956
2) Ortiz-Isabeles CJ, García-Avitia CA. Relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement in Mexican workers. Psicogente. 2021;24(45).
3) Aghnia FA, Airlangga. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND WORK ENGAGEMENT IN THE INPATIENT ROOM OF RS X LAMONGAN. J Indones Sosio Teknol. 2023;4(8):919–29.
4) Imran MY, Elahi NS, Abid G, Ashfaq F, Ilyas S. Impact of perceived organizational support on work engagement: Mediating mechanism of thriving and flourishing. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex [Internet]. 2020;6(3):82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030082
5) Ding H, Yu E, Li Y. Linking perceived organizational support for strengths use to task performance. Soc Behav Pers. 2020;48(3).
6) Kim D, Moon CW, Shin J. Linkages between empowering leadership and subjective well-being and work performance via perceived organizational and co-worker support. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018;39(7):844–58.
7) Pratiwi AR, Muzakki M. Perceived Organizational Support Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi dan Kinerja Karyawan. J Ilm Manaj dan Bisnis. 2021;22(1):111–20.
8) Bonaiuto F, Fantinelli S, Milani A, Cortini M, Vitiello MC, Bonaiuto M. Perceived organizational support and work engagement: the role of psychosocial variables. J Work Learn. 2022;34(5):418–36.
9) Sungu LJ, Weng Q (Derek), Kitule JA. When organizational support yields both performance and satisfaction: The role of performance ability in the lens of social exchange theory. Pers Rev. 2019;48(6):1410–28.
10) Najeemdeen, I.S; Abidemi, B.T; Rahmat, F.D;Bulus B. Perceived organizational culture and perceived organizational support on work engagement. In Perceived organizational culture and perceived organizational support on work engagement: Najeemdeen, Iliyasu Shiyanbade. Acad J Econ Stud. 2018;54(275).
11) Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Percieve Organisational Support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500–7.
12) Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):698–714.
13) Eisenberger R, Rhoades Shanock L, Wen X. Perceived Organizational Support: Why Caring about Employees Counts. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2020;7:101–24.
14) Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS. Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. J Manage. 2017;43(6):1854–84.
15) Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, van Buuren S, van der Beek AJ, de Vet HCW. Improving the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. J Appl Meas. 2014;15(2):160–75.
16) Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology [Internet]. 1990. 687–732 p. Available from: https://awspntest.apa.org/record/1993-97198-012
17) Hamsinah H, Sunarsi D, Narimawati U, Munna AS, Pawar A. The Influence of Total Quality Management (TQM) and Organizational Culture on Employee Job Satisfaction that Impacts Employee Performance (Case Study on Cooperatives in South Tangerang City). Ekuilibrium J Ilm Bid Ilmu Ekon. 2023;18(2):156–68.
18) Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organ Res Methods. 2015;18(3):429–72.
19) Pratiwi HI, Wahyuningsih SH, Udin. Mapping the work-life balance research landscape: a bibliometric analysis. Multidiscip Rev. 2023;6(2).
20) van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSviewer Manual version 1-6-19. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden [Internet]. 2023;(January):54. Available from: http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf
21) Jimoh AL. The Influence of Perceived Organizational Support on Talent Management and Job Performance. J Apl Bisnis dan Manaj. 2022;8(3)