Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
1Ahmed Ait Bella, 2Nourddine Binij, 3Professor Redouane Madaoui
1,2,3Department of English Studies, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Ibnou Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-65Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This experimental research study was conducted to determine the effects of literature circles on 2nd year baccalaureate students’ reading comprehension skills. The sample consisted of two classes of second year baccalaureate Arts stream students studying at the same public high school. The classes which were chosen for either the experimental and control group were pretested using a reading comprehension text test. The treatment lasted for a period of eight weeks. After the experiment, participants were then post-tested using the same test scale. Students who underwent the treatment (literature circles) were randomly assigned to groups of seven or eight students, and were given a role to assume and a short story to read. After reading the story independently and completing their role sheets, students discussed the story within their small groups. The data collected were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. The results of the study indicated that there was a positive effect of literature circles on reading comprehension skills (summarizing, inferencing, and paraphrasing); the experimental group gained higher scores on the short answer-test compared to the control group. The results were interpreted using the t-test for independent samples. The t-test revealed that the difference between students who were exposed to the use of literature circles and those who were taught in the ordinary way was significant.
KEYWORDS:literature circles, reading comprehension, summarizing, inferencing, paraphrasing
REFERENCES1) Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). White Plains, NY: Longman.
2) Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1997). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 255-291). Longman.
3) Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning (2nd ed.). Boynton/Cook Publishers.
4) Brown, B. (2002). Using Literature Circles with Eighth Grade Students.
5) Brozo, W. G., & Flynt, E. S. (2008). Motivating students to read in the content classroom: Six evidence-based principles. The Reading Teacher, 62(2), 172-174.
6) Buckley, J. (2004). Fit to print: The Canadian student's guide to essay writing. Nelson Education.
7) Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
8) Chaffin, R. (1979). Knowledge of language and knowledge about the world: A reaction time study of invited and necessary inferences. Cognitive Science, 3, 311-328.
9) Cohen, R. (1983). Self-generated questions as an aid to reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36, 770-775.
10) Daniels, H. (1994). Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in Book Clubs and Reading Groups. Stenhouse Publishers.
11) Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups. Stenhouse Publishers.
12) Daniels, H., & Steineke, N. (2004). Mini-lessons for literature circles. Heinemann.
13) Daniels, H. (2009). Literature Circles and Student Engagement.
14) Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2001). “Groupwork in distance learning.” Chem. Engr. Education, inpress (2001).
15) Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The 'Good-Enough' approach to language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 71-75.
16) Furr, M. (2004). Literature circles for the EFL classroom. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from http://www.eflliteraturecircles.com/litcirclesforEFL.pdf
17) Furr, M. (2007). Literature circles for the EFL classroom. Yokohama City University.
18) Gauthier, L. R., Schorzman, E., & Hutchison, A. (2003). The Role of Academic Journals in Group Discussions.
19) Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2005). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Pearson.
20) Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE.
21) Graesser, A. C. (1981). Propositional and pragmatic inferences in stories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 135-147.
22) Hacker, D. (2008). A writer's reference (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
23) Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 222-234.
24) Hall, P. A., & Lamont, M. (Eds.). (2009). How institutions and culture affect health. University of Chicago Press.
25) Harris, R. J., & Monaco, G. E. (1978). Propositional and pragmatic inferences in understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 1-10.
26) Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Stenhouse Publishers.
27) Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Newbury House Publishers.
28) Hildyard, A. (1979). The effects of propositional and pragmatic inferences on reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(1), 33-40.
29) Ketch, A. (2005). Conversation: The comprehension connection. The Reading Teacher, 59(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.1.2
30) Klinger, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2002). The Effect of Cooperative Grouping on ESL Students.
31) McIntosh, E. (1985). What do practitioners need to know about current inference research? The Reading Teacher, 38(8), 755-760.
32) Nelson, G. (1984, October). Reading: A student-centered approach. English Teaching Forum, 2-5, 8.
33) Rascher, S. (2015). The Effects of Literature Circles on Non-fiction Reading Comprehension and Self-Perception of Reading Skills. SUNY Fredonia Master's Theses. Retrieved from https://soar.suny.edu/handle/20.500.12648/187
34) Sandmann, A., & Gruhler, D. (2007). Literature circles in action: Nurturing reading and responding in grades 3-8. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 10-17.
35) Schlick Noe, K. L., & Johnson, N. J. (1999). Getting started with literature circles. Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
36) Schumaker, J. B., Denton, P. H., & Deshler, D. D. (1984). The paraphrasing strategy. University of Kansas.
37) Short, K. G. (1990). Creating a community of learners. In K. G. Short & K. M. Pierce (Eds.), Talking about books: Creating literate communities, pp. 33-54. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38) Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.
39) Tierney, R. J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 60(5), 568–580.
40) The Merriam-Webster dictionary. (2013). Paraphrase. Retrieved from merriam-webster.com
41) Vaughn, S., Klinger, J., & Schumm, J. (1998). Collaborative Strategic Reading: Real-World Lessons from Classroom Teachers.