Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
1Nuragustini, 2Supardi, 3Handoyo Prasetyo
1,2,3Master of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-67Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to analyze the importance of criminalization in the use of animal testing in the production of cosmetics in Indonesia as well as the right formulation in the formation of policies on animal testing. The problem is why a criminalization policy is needed against producers who conduct animal testing as a product test in the cosmetics production process and how the formulation of criminalization arrangements against producers who conduct animal testing as a test of cosmetics products in the production process. To be able to answer the formulation of the problem, the research used is normative juridical research with a statutory approach and a comparative approach and conceptual approach. The results show that in conducting animal testing there is the concept of 3R (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement). The 3R concept is an ethic that can be used to realize an experiment by looking for possible alternatives. Because many cosmetic companies are competing in creating new innovations in order to meet the needs of consumers, so that not a few companies carry out the innovation process carried out by related parties in developing their products still often use animals for product trials, which in practice this reaps many cons both from an ethical and scientific perspective. For this reason, criminalization is needed with the existence of legal policies, especially criminal law policies with formulations that regulate starting from the procedure for conducting animal tasting, what animals can be used as animal tasting, and what the procedure is after conducting animal testing, and of course whether it is necessary to submit an application to the competent authority before conducting animal testing, finally that in a legislation also regulates how sanctions / penalties are given to everyone who deliberately violates these laws and regulations.
KEYWORDS:policy, animal welfare, criminalization, cosmetics, animal testing.
REFERENCES1) “What is Animal Testing”, About Animal Testing, http://www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/what- animal- testing.html, diakses pada 5 Maret 2024 Pukul 22.48 WIB.
2) Alya Maharani. “Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Penerapan Hukuman terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Hewan yang Menyebabkan Kematian”, National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS). Vol. 2. No. 1. (2020).
3) Azhara Devica Risnanda, dan Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. “Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Klasifikasi Bentuk Kekerasan Terhadap Hewan Di Indonesia”. Res Nullius Law Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023).
4) Bambang Waluyo. 2021. Dinamika Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Depok: Rajawali Pers.
5) Bronstad A, Newcomer CE, et.al. Current concepts of Harm–Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments. Lab Anim. 50:1– 20 (2016).
6) FBR (Foundation for Biomedical Research). 2016. Mice and rats: the essential need for animals in medical research, https://fbresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Mice-Rats-In- Biomedical-ResearchFBR.pdf, diakses pada 5 Maret 2024 pukul 19.23 WIB.
7) Gettayacamin M, Retnam L. 2017. AAALAC International Standards And Accreditation Process. Toxicol Res. 33:183-189
8) https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3998884/menteri-lhk-kejahatan-satwa-liar-peringkat-ke-3-di- indonesia/, Diakses pada 1 Maret 2024 pukul 15.04 WIB.
9) https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-65484552, Diakses pada 1 Maret 2024 pukul 15.20 WIB.
10) https://www.cnnindonesia.com/edukasi/20180103105033-445-266317/sisi-kelam-produk-kosmetik/, Diakses pada 1 Maret 2024 pukul 15.10 WIB.
11) https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/217998/juara-dunia-penyiksa-hewan-indonesia-banyak-unggah- konten-kekerasan-binatang-di-media-sosial/, Diakses pada 1 Maret 2024 pukul 15.02 WIB.
12) K. Wahyu Utami, Kampanye Body Shop “Againts Animal Testing”, Kompas.com, 17/09/2013, 10:09 WIB. Diakses pada Kamis 27 Juni 2024, Pukul 06.34 WIB. https://lifestyle.kompas.com/read/2013/09/17/1009461/Kampanye.Body.Shop.Againts.Animal.Testing.
13) Kadek Karang Agustina, 2015, Kesejahteraan Hewan “Animal Welfare”, Bali: Laboratorium Kesehatan Masyarakat Veteriner Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan Universitas Udayana.
14) Lis Maesarah ,Frentika Wahyu R., Peran Cruelty Free International(CFI) Dalam Menangani Kasus Animal Testingdi Jerman, INTERDEPENDENCE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, Volume 5 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024, 39-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54144/ijis.v5i1.71.
15) Pangestu, A., Tan, R. H., Angelia, V., & Hidiyana, V. Tinjauan Etis Dan Ilmiah Mengenai Penggunaan Hewan Sebagai Subjek Uji Coba Dalam Industri Kosmetik. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, Volume 2, Nomor 01, 2024.
16) Pasal 1 angka 42 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2009 Tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan
17) Pasal 66 ayat (2) huruf e dan g Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2009 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan.
18) Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2013. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
19) Pound P, Nicol CJ, Retrospective Harm Benefit Analysis Of Preclinical Animal Research For Six Treatment Interventions. PLoS ONE. 13:1-26, 2018.
20) Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
21) Salva Reverentia Yurista, Rafi Andika Ferdian, dan Djanggan Sargowo, “Prinsip 3Rs dan Pedoman ARRIVE pada Studi Hewan Cobra”. Jurnal Kardiologi Indonesia. Vol. 37 No. 3, 2016.
22) Saputri, M. dan I. N, (n.d.). Komunikasi Retorika oleh Brand Ambassador dalam Kampanye Kosmetik Cruelty-Free. Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi Makna, Volume 9, Nomor 1. h, hal. 14–20.
23) Studdert, Virginia P., Clive C. Gay, and Kenneth W. Hinchcliff, “Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary”, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2020.
24) Sutiastuti Wahyuwardani, SM Noor dan B Bakrie, Etika Kesejahteraan Hewan dalam Penelitian dan Pengujian: Implementasi dan Kendalanya, WARTAZOA, Vol. 30 No. 4, 2020, hal. 211-220. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v30i4.2529.