July 2024

Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
Legal Certainty of Payment of Receivers' Fees in the Event That Bankruptcy is canceled by the Court
1Felicia Situmorang, 2Imam Haryanto, 3Muthia Sakti
1,2,3Master of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-68

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research examines the implementation of payment of curatorial services in the event of annulment by the Court of the Supreme Court Decision. This study also describes the legal certainty of payment of curatorial fees from the side of the curator, debtor and creditor. Normative research is research that refers to legal norms contained in legislation and court decisions. The author uses the 1945 Constitution, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2021 concerning Guidelines for Fees for Curator and Management Services. The results of this study are that the payment of curatorial services in the event that it is canceled by the Court on the Supreme Court Decision has been regulated in the Applicable Laws that regarding curatorial fees has been regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and in Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2021 concerning Guidelines for Service Fees for Curators and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations as a technical regulation governing curatorial fees. In practice, it is the Panel of Judges that determines the amount of the curator's fee after the application for the determination of the curator's fee is submitted by the Curator to the Court.

KEYWORDS:

legal certainty, fees, receivership, bankruptcy.

REFERENCES
1) Asra Darma Putra, Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit oleh Kurator dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004, SKRIPSI UIN, halaman 8

2) Bimo Putro, 2015, Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Kewenangan Hakim Pengawas Dalam Mengawasi Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Di Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya”, Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, sebagaimana diakses pada link https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/35571-ID-pelaksanaan-tugas-dankewenangan-hakim-pengawas-dalam-mengawasi-pengurusan-dan-p.pdf halaman 6

3) Fitri Novia Heriani, 2021, Penjelasan Kemenkumham Terkait Penurunan Fee Pengurus dan Kurator, sebagaimana diakses pada link Penjelasan Kemenkumham Terkait Penurunan Fee Pengurus dan Kurator (hukumonline.com) pada tanggal 29/05/2023

4) Fitri Novia Heriani, Penjelasan Kemenkumham Terkait Penurunan Fee Pengurus dan Kurator sebagaimana diakses pada link Penjelasan Kemenkumham Terkait Penurunan Fee Pengurus dan Kurator (hukumonline.com) tanggal 1 Desember 2023

5) Heru Sugiyono, 2023, “Problematics of Property Companies Experiencing Bankruptcy”, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, Vol. 10 No. 8, hlm. 209-222, http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i8.4857.

6) Hukum Online, Blak – Blakan Pengurus Soal Fee Dalam Perkara PKPU, sebagaimana diakses pada link Blak-blakan Pengurus Soal Fee dalam Perkara PKPU (hukumonline.com) tanggal 1 Desember 2023

7) Ida Bagus Adi Wiradharma dan Ida Ayu Sukihaman, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kurator Dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Debitur Pailit, Jurnal Hukum Universitas Udayana, Bali, halaman 1

8) Imam Haryanto, Muthia Sakti, Herdandi Irsyad Bhagaskara, Sita Narawita Puteri, dan Yoshiro Emillio Lumban Tobing, 2024, “Rekonstruksi Hukum Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya Berdasarkan Analisis Ekonomi”. Bina Hukum Lingkungan 6 (3):317-34. https://bhl-jurnal.or.id/index.php/bhl/article/view/219.

9) Imam Haryanto, Suherman Suherman, Muthia Sakti, dan Ibrahim Hanif Khalilullah, 2024, “Unleashing the Power of Class Action Lawsuits: Redefining Justice for Insurance Policyholders in Indonesia”. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1, hlm. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v4i1.75668.

10) Imran Nating, Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2005, halaman 71

11) Ivida Dewi Amrih Suci dan Herawati Poesoko, Hak Kreditur Separatis Dalam Mengeksekusi Benda Jaminan Debitur Pailit, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta, halaman 63

12) Leonardus, Rad Fridsel; Novitasari, Kedudukan Hukum Kreditur Yang Tidak Terverifikasi Dalam Undang Undang Kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat. Volume 6 Nomor 3 Desember 2020, halaman 250-264

13) Lihat ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat (1) dan Pasal 69 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

14) Raymond Hutagaol, Kedudukan Kurator Dalam Kepailitan, sebagaimana diakses pada link Kedudukan Kurator Dalam Kepailitan (hukumkepailitan.com) pada tanggal 29/05/2023
Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar