July 2024

Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
An Analysis of Students’ Perspectives on the Implementation of Group Work in English Learning Process
1Hasanuddin Fatsah, 2Amna Meilan Mohi, 3Ashrafiany
1,2,3English Language Education and Applied Linguistics Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-74

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research investigated the perspectives of students on the implementation of group work in English learning process associated with five basic principles that facilitate group work, a theory by Johnson and Johnson (2009). The qualitative method was used to construct this research through the interview as the main technique and documentation to support the research data. This research was conducted in SMK Negeri 1 Marisa at the second-grade students. As a result, researcher found that (1). All participants showed a positive response associated with positive interdependence, in a sense of responsibility was emphasized. (2). The second basic principle that must exist is simultaneous interaction, which is related to the interactions of students, and the quality of their interactions. Related to this, there was a negative response from students on how the students were divided into groups. (3). Students gave quite positive responses related to the third basic principle, individual accountability, which is about the contribution of each student in the group. (4). The majority of students know how to act in groups, giving skills to students must be done and trained to be applied consistently. (5). Teachers need to consistently provide instructions, monitor the learning process, and evaluate it at the end of class. Investigating student perspectives regarding a strategy or a method implemented by the teacher in the teaching and learning process is something that needs to be done. By not ignoring students' opinions or perspectives, the teaching and learning process will take place more optimally.

KEYWORDS:

Students ‘perspectives, group work. learning

REFERENCES
1) Baines, E. Blatchford, P. & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Group Work in Primary Schools: Effect on Science Attainment. British Educational Research Journal. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/

2) Ballantine, J. & Larres, P.M. (2007). Cooperative Learning: A Pedagogy to Improve Students’ Generic Skills?. Education and Training. Retrieved from http://pure.qub.ac.uk/

3) Barkhuizan, C. (1989). Discovering Learners’ Perceptions of ESL Classroom Teaching/Learning Activities in South African Context. TESOL Quarterly. Retrieved from http://jstor.org/

4) Creswell. (2009). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Retrieved from http://researchgate.net

5) Cooper, L. Johnson, D. Johnson, R. & Wilderson, P. (1980). Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Experiences on Interpersonal Attraction among Heterogeneous Peers. Journal of Social Psychology. Retrieved from http://researchgate.net/

6) Davis, B.D. (1993). Collaborative Learning: Group Work and Study Teams. Tools for Teaching. San Fransissco: Jossey-Bass Publisher. Retrieved from http://finchpark.com/

7) Eggen.P, & Kauchak.D.(1998). Learning and Teaching – Research Based Method. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.

8) Granstorm, K. (1998). Classroom Management in Sweden. Classroom Management in International Perspective. New York: Garland Publisher.

9) Hancock. Windridge. & Ockleford. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. The NIHR RDS EM. Retrieved from http://rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/

10) Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Interaction Books. Retrieved from http://researchgate.net/

11) Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Collaborative Learning and Argumentation. London: Cassell. Retrieved from http://researchgate.net/

12) Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2006). Essay on Cooperative Learning. Bartleby Writing.

13) Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2008). Social Interdependence, Moral Characther, and Moral Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

14) Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researchers. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/

15) Kemp., Jerrold E. (1995). Instruction Desigen: A Plan for Unit and Course Development,. Belmon: Feron. Retrieved from http://unpas.ac.id

16) Killen, R. (2007). Teaching Strategies for Outcomes-Based Education. Cape Town: Juta.

17) Saptono, S. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Semarang: UNNES.

18) Slavin, R.E. (1994). Comprehensive Cooperative Learning Models: Embedding Cooperative Learning in Curriculum and the School. London: Praeger Publisher.

19) Yamarik, S. (2007). Does Cooperative Learning Improve Students Learning Outcomes? The Journal of Economic Education. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/
Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar