Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024
1Doni Pratama Siregar, 2Fifiana Wisnaeni
1Diponegoro University Master of Law student. Semarang.
2Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University. Semarang.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-94Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The Constitutional Court is a state institution formed after reform. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court is to decide disputes over general election results. Disputes regarding general election results are closely related to political practices or national political conditions. Political conditions will greatly influence the Constitutional Court's decision regarding disputes over general election results. The political configuration resulting from the intersection between law and politics occurred in the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over general election results. This research uses normative legal research. The approaches taken are a statutory approach and a case approach. Data was collected through library research. In the case of dispute over the results of the 2024 general election, the emergence of dissenting opinions by judges has shown that there are differences in the schools of thought held by constitutional judges. The school of thought held is very closely related to political views. So that PHPU decisions that have a strong political dimension result in the emergence of decisions that have an authoritarian or orthodox character.
KEYWORDS:Constitutional court, Constitutional judges, Dissenting Opinion, General Election Results Disputes
REFERENCES1) Satrio, A. (2015). The Authority of the Constitutional Court to Decide Election Results Disputes as a form of judicialization of politics, Constitutional Journal, Vol. 12, no. 1
2) A'yun, AQ, Hidayat, AS, & Zein, F. (2019). Judge's Dissenting Opinion on the Supreme Court Decision in the Famous Brand Case Yumi Katsura and Prada, Journal of Legal Research, Vol. 1, No. 1
3) Angraini, P, (2022), Dynamics of Political Configuration on the Character of Legal Products in the Era of Indonesian Democratic Government, Jurnal Madani, Vol. 14, no. 1
4) Santoso, B. (2021). Legal Politics, Banten: UNPAM Press.
5) Ibrahim, J. (2006).Normative Legal Research Theory and Methodology, Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.
6) Nazir, M.Research methods, Jakarta: Ghalia, 1998.
7) Prasetianingsih, R. (2009). General Election Results Dispute (PHPU) at the Constitutional Court as the Last Legal Recourse in Resolving General Election Disputes, Constitutional Journal Volume I, Number 1.
8) Aaron, R. (2016). Reconstruction of the Authority to Settle Disputes on General Election Results, Constitutional Journal, Vol. 13, no. 1.
9) Rustam, Marlina, T. & Handoko, D. (2022). History of the Establishment and Authority of the Constitutional Court in the Indonesian Constitutional System, DIMENSI Journal, Vol. 11, no. 2.
10) Salam, A. (2015), Political Influence in Legal Formation in Indonesia, Mazahib Journal of Islamic Thought Vol. 14, no. 2.
11) Rahardjo, S. (1991). Legal studies. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
12) Firdasu, S, U. Panjaitan, P, A, N. Widyasasmito, R, K. (2020). The Role of Constitutional Judges' Dissenting Opinion in National Legal Reform, Journal of de jure legal research, Vol. 20, no. 1.
13) Suteki., Taufani, G. (2017). Legal Research Methods (Philosophy, Theory and Practice), Depok: Rajawali Press.