Volume 07 Issue 08 August 2024
1Inten Mustika K, 2Rohmad, 3Abdulloh Hasan, 4Nur Anisa Setyaningrum
1,2,3,4UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Jl. A. Yani, North Purwokerto, Banyumas Regency, Indonesia.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-47Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the management of the KKNI curriculum implemented at UIN Saizu Purwokerto and whether it has met continuous improvement (CI) with the model set out in SPMI, namely PPEPP which consists of curriculum determination, curriculum implementation, curriculum implementation evaluation, curriculum implementation control and curriculum improvement. This research is field research with a qualitative paradigm by exploring data from data sources of curriculum documents KKNI UIN Saizu Purwokerto and interview results from deputy Dean I for academic and learning affairs. The data were analyzed by qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study showed that the management of the KKNI curriculum at UIN Saizu Purwokerto applies the PPEPP model to meet continuous improvement (CI), especially in the process approach and system approach. Curriculum determination through the stages of preparing the drafting team, needs analysis, graduate profiles, learning outcomes, study materials, courses, credit weights, curriculum structure, curriculum draft review, and curriculum determination. The implementation of the curriculum includes the management of learning, courses, educators/lecturers, and education staff. Curriculum evaluation is carried out by formative evaluation and summative evaluation. Curriculum control is grouped into the control of faculties and universities as education providers. The curriculum development of UIN Saizu Purwokerto is carried out by looking at the fulfillment of analysis on graduate profiles, SKL CPL, course determination, course changes, content/topic/theme, depth of study, weight of credits, and distribution of courses.
KEYWORDS:Curriculum Management, KKNI Curriculum, PPEPP, Continuous Improvement
REFERENCES1) Almazova, N., Krylova, E., Rubtsova, A., & Odinokaya, M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for Russian higher education amid covid-19: Teachers’ perspective. Education Sciences, 10(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120368
2) Brandli, L. L. al. (2020). Evaluation of sustainability using the AISHE Instrument: case study in a Brazilian University. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 4(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v4i2.1248
3) Directorate of Quality Assurance. (2018). Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) Guidelines. In Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (1st ed.).
4) Fuertes-Camacho, M., Graell-Martín, M., Fuentes-Loss, M., & Balaguer-Fàbregas, M. (2019). Integrating Sustainability into Higher Education Curricula through the Project Method, a Global Learning Strategy. Sustainability, 11(3), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030767
5) García, J., Oropesa, M., Maldonado, A., García-Alcaraz, J. L., Oropesa-Vento, M., & Maldonado-Macías, A. A. (2017). Kaizen Planning, Implementing and Controlling (Management and Industrial Engineering). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47747-3
6) Helmold, M. (2020). Kaizen: Continuous Improvements in Small Steps. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46981-8_3
7) Junaidi, A. et al. (2020). Higher Education Curriculum Preparation Guide (S. S. Kusumawardani (ed.); 4th ed.). Directorate General of Higher Education of the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia.
8) Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Independent Learning Guidebook - Independent Campus (1st ed.). Directorate General of Higher Education of the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ujmte
9) Kregel, I. (2019). Kaizen in university teaching: continuous course improvement. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(4), 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-08-2018-0090
10) Lubis, A. F. (2020). Curriculum Management Based on the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI) in Islamic Universities. AL-TANZIM: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 4(2), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v4i2.1248
11) Masykur, R. (2019). Theory and study of curriculum development. In Aura Publisher (September Issue).
12) Maurer, R. (2016). The Kaizen Way (Vol. 15, Issue 2). Workman Publishing.
13) Mora, J. N. (2014). Continuous Improvement Strategy. European Scientific Journal, 10(34), 117–126.
14) Munadi, M. (2020). Systematizing internationalization policy of higher education in state islamic universities. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p96
15) Nurhadi, & Setiyawan, A. (2017). Model of application of the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI) as a strengthening of the quality of the Arabic Language Education Study Program. Al Mahāra: Journal of Arabic Language Education, 3(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2017.032-02
16) O’Reilly, S., Healy, J., Murphy, T., & O’Dubhghaill, R. (2017). A Continuous Improvement Journey in the Higher Education Sector: A Case Study of a University in Ireland. 7–15. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316371
17) Rohman, M. A. A., & Fahmi, I. R. (2021). Building Sustainability (Continuous Improvement) in Education. Al-MIKRAJ: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 2(1), 25–33.
18) Romansyah, R. et al. (2022). Higher Education Curriculum Management in the Industrial Era 4.0. 9(1), 1–5.
19) Saifulloh, A. (2012). The concept of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in the World of Education. At-Ta'dib, 7(1), 1–13.
20) Sherli et.al, L. N. (2020). Educational Management Theory and Practical Review (1st ed.). Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung.
21) Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2019). Strategic Implementation of Continuous Improvement Approach. Springer International Publishing.
22) Slykhuis, B. (2020). Continuous Improvement in Higher Education. In B. Slykhuis (Ed.), Taylor dan Francis Group CRC Press (1st ed., Vol. 1).
23) Sugian, S. (2016). Pendekatan Proses dalam ISO 9001: 2015. Nternational Organization for Standardization, 1–4.
24) Sugiyono. (2021). The Importance of Aligning SPMI and SPME in the Implementation of the Internal Quality Assurance System of Higher Education. Matemar Journal: Maritime Management and Technology, 2(1), 43–48.
25) Suhendraya, H. (2021). CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AND KKNI-BASED CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (Study at the Agribusiness Study Program, Wiralodra Indramayu University). 3(1), 14–24.
26) Suyitno; et al. (2020). Guidelines for the Implementation of Independent Learning Independent Campus in the Study Program Curriculum at Islamic Religious Universities. In Directorate of Higher Education of Islamic Religion, Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia (Vol. 68, Issue 1).
27) Tampubolon, M. (2004). Application and Approach of Systems Theory: A Case Study of HKBP Nomensen University. E-USU Repository, 1–35.
28) Thessaloniki. (2006). Kaizen Definition & Principles in Brief a Concept & Tool for Employees Involvement. www.michailolidis.gr.
29) Yuwono, U. (2019). Ideologies underpinning the Indonesian National Qualification Framework (IQF) for higher education website text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 668. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15271