August 2024

Volume 07 Issue 08 August 2024
Legal Protection of Defaulting Debtors against the Auction of Mortgage Rights below Market Value
1Ilham Rizky Pratama,2Adi Sulistiyono,3Bambang Santoso
1Master of Notary Student at the Faculty of Law, SebelasMaret University. Surakarta.
2,3Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, SebelasMaret University, Surakarta.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-70

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The auctioning of mortgage rights below market value is a highly detrimental action for the debtor, as the debtor does not participate in determining the auction limit price. This thesis research utilizes two (2) court decisions as research material: Decision Number 402/Pdt/2017/PT Smg and Decision Number 5513/Pdt.G/2019/PA Jr. The objective of this research is to determine the legal protection measures available to debtors whose mortgage rights are auctioned below market value and to explore the legal remedies that debtors can pursue. The type of research in this thesis is normative with a prescriptive nature. The legal materials used in this research include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials is through literature study, and the analysis of legal materials is conducted using syllogistic deduction.

KEYWORDS:

Mortgage right, non-performing loan, auction.

REFERENCES
1) Asikin, Z. (2015). Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

2) Badrulzaman, M. D. (1978). Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Medan: Alumni.

3) Bahsan, M. (2007). Hukum Jaminan Dan jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

4) Fuady, M. (2013). Hukum Jaminan Utang. Jakarta: Erlangga.

5) Fuady, M. (2013). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

6) Harahap, M. Y. (1986). Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.

7) Harsono, B. (1999). Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan UUPA, Isi, Dan Pelasanaan. Jakarta: Djambatan.

8) Nasution, B. J. (2014). Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern. Yustisia, 118-130.

9) Nursyahriana, A., & Tricahyadinata, I. (2017). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Kredit Macet. Forum Ekonomi, 1-14.

10) Prodjodikoro, W. (2003). Hukum Perdata Tentang Persetujuan-Persetujuan Tertentu. Bandung: Sumur.

11) Purwanti, Atmaja , I. T., & Putu, N. (2021). Pengaturan Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Hukum Perbankan. Kertha Wicara, 802-811.

12) Simanjutak, P. (2021). Hukum Lelang Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

13) Usman, R. (2015). Hukum Lelang. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

14) Widjaja, K. M. (2008). Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan: Hak Tanggungan. Jakarta: Kencana.

15) Widowati, C., & Herliani, H. (2021). Nalar Mazhab Sosiologis Dalam Penemuan Hukum Yang Berkeadlian Oleh Hakim. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 262-288.
Volume 07 Issue 08 August 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar