Volume 07 Issue 08 August 2024
1Suci Wulandari,2Kadarusman
1,2Postgraduate STIE Malangkucecwara Malang, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-86Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The Empirical Study of Food and Beverage Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 aims to explain and forecast the impact of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and internal control on financial statements that are false. Because it stresses verifying theories using numerical measurements of research variables and statistical data analysis, this study takes a quantitative approach. The study's population consisted of 18 companies that were listed in the food and beverage sub-sector between 2013 and 2017 and were part of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Multiple linear regression analysis, often known as multiple regression, is the analysis model that is used to examine how the independent variables affect the dependent variable. The analysis's findings demonstrate how pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and internal control all significantly impact financial statement fraud at the same time. Internal control has little impact on fake financial statements, while pressure, opportunity, and rationalization all have a considerable impact.
KEYWORDS:Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Internal Control, Financial Fraud
REFERENCES1) Aina Dwi Oktavia, Arief Rahman, & Mahsina. (2021). Equity: Jurnal Akuntansi. 2 (1), 38-47.
2) Albrecht, W. Steve. (2012). Fraud Examination. South Western: Cengage Learning. E-Book.
3) Alison. 2006. Fraud Auditing. Artikel, reinfokus, PT. Reasuransi Indonesia Jakarta (diakses online melalui www.reindo.co.id).
4) Andayani, Tutut Dwi, 2010, “Pengaruh Karakteristik Dewan Komisaris Independen Terhadap Manajemen Laba (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia)”, Tesis, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
5) Cressey, D. (1953). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99, Skousen et al. 2009. Journal of Corporate Governance and Firm Performance, Vol. 13, 53-81.
6) Dewi, G. A. M. R. 2014. Pengaruh Moralitas Individu dan Pengendalian Internal pada Kecurangan Akuntansi (Studi Eksperimen pada Pemerintah Daerah Profinsi Bali).Tesis. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Udayana. Denpasar.
7) Diany, R. (2014). Determinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan : Pengujian Teori Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi (JBE), 3(2).
8) Freddie Choo & Kim Tan. (2008). The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors. Advances in Accounting Education. 9.
9) Gagola, Kristo. (2011). Analisis Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan-Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia. Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan, Fakultas Ekonomika Dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro.
10) Marshall B. Romney dan Paul John Steinbart. 2014 Sistem Informasi Akuntansi: Accounting Information Systems (Edisi 13), Prentice Hall
11) Mery Marliani & Yulius Jogi. (2015). Persepsi Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Pencurian Kas. Business Accounting Review, 3 (2).
12) Mulyadi. 2014. Sistem Akuntansi. Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
13) Rachmanta, R. dan Ikhsan, S. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan (Fraud) Di Sektor Pendidikan Kota Semarang. Accounting Analysis Journal. 3 (3).
14) Rustendi, Tedi. 2009. Analisis Terhadap Faktor Pemicu Terjadinya Fraud (Suatu Kajian Teoritis Bagi Kepentingan Audit Internal). Jurnal Akuntansi, 4 (2), 705-714.
15) Santoso, Dyon & Harti Budi Yanti. (2015). Pengaruh Perilaku Tidak Jujur dan Kompetensi Moral Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud) Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi. 15 (1).
16) Santoso,S. 2006. Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Parametrik, Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta :PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
17) Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, Fourth Edition, New York: John Willey&Sons, Inc.
18) Singarimbun, M. 2006. Metode penelitian Survei. Jakarta. LP3ES
19) Viva Yustitia Rini & Tarmizi Achmad. (2012). Analisis Prediksi Potensi Risiko Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Fraud Score Model. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 1 (1: 1-15.
20) Widayat & Amirullah. 2005. Riset Bisnis, Edisi 1, Surabaya: CV. Cahaya Press
21) Winarno, Wing Wahyu. 2006. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Edisi ke-dua. UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.
22) Wolfe, David T. Dana R. Hermanson. 2004. The Fraud Diamond: Considering The Four Element of Fraud. CPA Journal. 74 (12): 38-42.