September 2024

Volume 07 Issue 09 September 2024
Writing Challenges on Students ’ Thesis Abstract at English Language Education Study Program Faculty of Letters and Culture Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
1Tenri Fada, 2Hasanuddin Fatsah, 3Muziatun
1,2,3Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i09-37

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The study deals with Writing Challenges in ELESP Students thesis Abstarcts at English Language Education Study Program Faculty of Letters and Culture Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. The objectives of the study are to investigate the types of grammatical errors and to find out the most grammatical errors are occurred in writing abstrat made by English Language Education Study Program. This research used a qualitative research approach and case study research method. The data of this research were 15 thesis asbtracts of under-graduated students published from 2020, 2021 and 2022. The steps of error analysis were collection of errors, the error detection and the error description. The process of the data analysis was elaborated based on Dulay, Burt, & Krashen (1982). The research findings indicated that grammatical errors which committed by under-graduated students were omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. From the types of error, abstracts in academic year 2020 have : 6 omission, 1 addition, 2 misformation, 6 misordering, academic year 2021: 3 omission, 3 misformation and 13 misordering, and abstract 2022 have erorr : 3 omission, 6 misformation and 6 misordering. Therefore, there were 25 misordering errors that were the most common grammatical errors made by the students in writing abstracts.

KEYWORDS:

Grammatical Errors, Writing and Abstract of thesis

REFERENCES
1) Abbott, H. Porter. 2002. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

2) Agustin, R., & Wulandari, S. (2022). The Analysis of Grammatical Errors on Students’ Essay Writing by Using Grammarly. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency.

3) Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press. (Released in 1975).

4) Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9(2), 147–160.

5) Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and Research design: Choosing among five tradition. California: SAGE Publication, Inc.

6) Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. Oxford University Press.

7) Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

8) Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

9) Hadi, Sutrisno. 2001. Methodology Research (Jilid 3). Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.

10) Hasanuddin, Muhammad, Puasa, Zulqorimah. (2011). Critical Discource Analysis Of Cohesion On Students Academic Writing And Its Impact To Effective Feedback. Indonesia- Managing Higher Education For Relevance And Efficienty (IMHERE)

11) Jasim (2018). Error Analysis of Written English Compositions: The Case of Learners of Prime University in Bangladesh.

12) Kawuryanti, Adi, S. E., Kawuryanti, Adi, S. E., Kawuryanti, & Adi, S. E. (2017). Kesalahan penulisan ejaan dalam kata Bahasa Indonesia mahasiswa Thailand jurusan ASEAN studies Universitas Walailak tahun 2016/2017. Muatan Lokal Perpustakaan Universitas Negeri Malang - UM Digital Repository, 1(1).

13) Koentjaraningrat. 1993. Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia

14) Kusumarasdyati. (2019). The Use of Three Development Model as Research Methodology in Language Teaching. In International Seminar on Language,Education, and Culture (ISoLEC),1-5.

15) Longman Dictionary Of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics (2010)

16) Mcmillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in Education. A Conceptual Introduction (5th Ed). Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

17) Mohammad (2013). Error Analysis of Written English Essays: The Case of Students of the Preparatory Year Program in Saudi Arabia. Sawalmeh University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia.

18) Papanas, N., Georgiadis, G., Maltezos, E., & Lazarides, M. K. (2012). Writing a research abstract: Eloquence in miniature. International Angiology: A Journal of the International Union of Angiology, 31(3), 297– 302.

19) Porte, G. K. (2002). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam.

20) Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21) Sri Wahyuni (2012) entitled. Error Analysis of Students Often made many errors in tenses. Syarif Hidayatullah’ State Islamic University Jakarta.

22) Slade, C., & Perrin, R. (2010). Form and Style: Research Papers, Reports, Theses (13th Edition). Cambirdge, MA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

23) Supranont Pisamai (20120. Developing a Writing Template of Research Article Abstracts: A Corpus-Based Method.Thailand

24) Uma, J. C., & Ponnambala, T. (2001). Teaching writing skill through silent movie: An experiment. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 10(1), 93-99. ISSN 0971-2690. India: Indira Gandhi National Open University. Downloaded on March 2020.
Volume 07 Issue 09 september 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar