Volume 08 Issue 02 February 2025
1Mark Quinquino, 2Charito Ong
1,2University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i2-35Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study explores how Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) can address identified learning gaps in English proficiency among students at a private college in Northern Mindanao. The research investigates students' difficulties in applying communication models, analyzing reading materials, and composing structured academic papers. Employing a qualitative research design, data was collected through focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that CLT significantly improves students' engagement, confidence, and comprehension, particularly in applying communication theories, structuring written outputs, and critical reading. The study proposes an intervention program integrating CLT principles to enhance language instruction effectiveness. This research contributes to English language pedagogy by demonstrating CLT’s applicability in improving core competencies and fostering communicative competence among students in higher education.
KEYWORDS:Communicative Language Teaching, English Language Proficiency, Language Instruction, Higher Education, Learning Outcomes
REFERENCES1) Al-Mamari, M. (2022). The impact of communicative language teaching on second language learners. Journal of Language Learning Research, 14(2), 87-102.
2) Brown, C. (2023). Communicative teaching approaches and their effect on student engagement. International Journal of Linguistic Studies, 19(1), 56-72.
3) Dos Santos, L. (2022). Student-centered learning in second language acquisition: The role of interaction. Language Education Review, 11(3), 33-49.
4) Ellis, R. (2023). Task-based language teaching and communicative approaches. Journal of Language Pedagogy, 11(3), 102-119.
5) Harmer, J. (2023). Effective writing strategies in communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics Journal, 28(4), 77-91.
6) Johnson, M., & Smith, R. (2023). The influence of interactive learning strategies on language proficiency. Educational Linguistics, 7(2), 45-60.
7) Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. (2023). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Cambridge University Press.
8) Larsen Freeman, D. (2023). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
9) Qian, H. (2023). Examining fluency development in communicative language classes. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 12-28.
10) Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2022). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
11) Teh, L. (2023). Student engagement in language learning: A CLT perspective. Asian Journal of Education, 8(2), 67-89.
12) Tweedie, M., & Johnson, E. (2023). Evaluating the role of communicative language teaching in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15(1), 34-50.
13) Zhang, X., & Liu, Y. (2023). The role of interactive language instruction in higher education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 112-130.