February 2025

Volume 08 Issue 02 February 2025
Perspectives on Four-Fold Functions and Organizational Performance of State Universities and Colleges
Leo Roswald Mangle Tugonon
D.M., Palompon Institute of Technology, College Of Arts And Sciences, Business Administration, College Of Graduate Studies
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i2-44

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study centers on the inadequately explored relationship between the demographic profiles of key officials in State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) and the organizational performance of these institutions, particularly in Region VIII. Using a quantitative method approach, quantitative data from institutional office performance commitment and review (OPCR) of the institution’s key officials were analyzed. Findings indicate that generally a high degree of consistency in the performance of the required functions of the key officials in the academic organizations, even though there may be some variability in performance across different functions within the organization. This is indicated by the standard deviation values. The implications of these findings suggest that enhancing quality and fostering excellence in the said core functions are critical for improving overall organizational performance in state universities. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to assess sustained impacts and explore additional factors affecting organizational effectiveness in higher education settings. Organizational performance, Office Performance Commitment, and Review, Instruction, Research, Extension, and Production.

REFERENCES
1) Cabaron, J. B. (2018). Organizational Performance of Higher Education Institutions in the Philippines. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities.

2) Casillano, N., Azura, A., Abenis, E., & Madeja, J. (2021). Comparative Historical Trends of Faculty Performance in Instruction, Research and Extension in a Philippine State University. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 14(37), 2865-2870

3) Cimene, F. T. A., Talili, I. N., Telen, M. A. E., & Yaňez, S. S. (2021). Quality assurance and school outcomes: A Philippine state university experience. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD), 3(07), 01-11.

4) Denmark, S., Macalisang. (2023). Administrative Practices of School Administrators and Instructional Supervision: Analysis of the Impact Towards School Organizational Culture. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, doi: 10.55559/sjahss.v2i02.90

5) Dina, Khalid, Al-Harthi. (2018). Balanced scorecard automation system in higher education institutions.

6) Emerald Publishing Limited. (2023).Improving organizational performance. Strategic Direction. doi: 10.1108/sd-04-2023-0058 PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

7) Ernie, C., Cerado., Nathaniel, D., Naanep. (2023). Measuring the performance of higher education among state universities and colleges in SOX Region, Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23946

8) Guiamalon, T.S. (2022). Social And Economic Development: State Universities and Colleges' (Suc’s). Contribution Creativity Skills of the Students in Recycling. Globus Journal of Progressive Education A Refereed Research Journal Vol. 12, / No 1 .

9) Johnson, T. & Harper, M. (2021). Journal of Leadership Studies

10) Lee, D., & Wang, H. (2022). Higher Education Quarterly.

11) Rivera, J., & Tan, C. (2023). Educational Administration Quarterly.

12) Ulabor, E. A., & Bosede, A. I. (2019). Employee commitment and organizational performance in selected fast food outlets in Osun State. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 1(1), 23-37.
Volume 08 Issue 02 February 2025

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar