¹Gerri Endra Jaya, ²Budi Santoso

¹Student of the Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
²Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-16

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Intellectual Property is intangible wealth. Intellectual property is an important aspect for the industry to monopolize the inventions that have been discovered. There are issues in the trademark protection system, namely the territorial principle. The territorial principle is a principle that emphasizes that the protection of intellectual property is only granted within the territory of the relevant country and does not cover global protection. This writing uses a normative legal writing method, with an approach through legislation and case studies. Data is collected from literature studies. The territorial principle has weaknesses because the inventor only receives protection in the country where they register. This opens up opportunities for the inventions that have been discovered to be owned by others outside the territory of the application registered by the inventor. The case of ARM ARUMI Moto Parts owned by PT Dtech Inovasi Indonesia serves as evidence of the weakness of trademark protection based on the territorial principle. The trademark ARM ARUMI Moto Parts, which has been registered in Indonesia, can still be registered in Malaysia and the Philippines with similar brand labels, phonetics, classes, and goods by parties other than PT Dtech Inovasi Indonesia.

KEYWORDS:

ARM ARUMI Moto Parts, Territorial Principle, Intellectual Property.

REFERENCES
1) Agil Febriansyah Santoso, Budi Santoso, 2022, “Implementasi Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum”, NOTARIUS, Vol. 15, No. 2, hlm. 819

2) Astrid Puspita Ramadhani, Kholis Roisah, 2024, “Penerapan Prinsip First to File Dalam Sengketa Merek Internasional Putusan Nomor: 106/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst”, Vol. 7, No. 1, hlm. 454

3) Damar Ramadhana Tanjung, Rinitami Njatrijani, Bagus Rahmanda, 2023, “Penerapan Prinsip First to File dalam Sengketa Merek Terkenal, Law, Development, & Justice Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, hlm. 113

4) David Bainbridge, 1999, Intellectual Property, England: Financial Times Pitman Publishing, hlm. 3

5) Henry Soelistyo, 2014, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Konsepsi, Opini dan Aktualisasi, Jakarta Selatan: Penaku, hlm. 9

6) Jhonny Ibrahim, 2006. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Teori dan Metode, Malang: Bayu Media Publishing

7) Juwita, 2022, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum, Yogyakarta: Stiletto Indie Book, p.11

8) M. Citra Ramadhan, Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar, Bagus Firman Wibowo, 2024, Buku Ajar Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Medan, Universitas Medan Area Press, hlm. 2

9) M. Nazir, 1998, Metode Penelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia

10) Maria Alfons, 2017, “Implementasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum”, Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia ukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, Vol. 15, No. 03, p.357-358

11) Nanda Dwi Rizkia, Hardi Fardiansyah, 2022, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual SUATU PENGANTAR, Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung, hlm. 1

12) Suteki & Galang Taufani, 2017. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Filosofi, Teori dan Praktik, Depok: Rajawali Pers.

13) Tim Lindsey, dkk, 2022, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, Bandung: PT Alumni, hlm. 9

14) Topo Santoso, 2020, “Asas Teritorialitas dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Pengertian dan Perkembangannya”, Jurnal Hukum Pidana & Kriminologi, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm. 1

15) Yoyi Arifardhani, 2020, Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta, Kencana, hlm. 16

Volume 08 Issue 05 May 2025