May 2025

Volume 08 Issue 05 May 2025
An Exploratory Study on the Causes of Student Failure in Quarterly Examinations: A Case of Choekhorling Middle Secondary School, Sarpang
1Gyeltshen, 2Kezang Sherub, 3Tshegyal Dawa
1,2,3Choekhorling Middle Secondary School, Sarpang Bhutan
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-52

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This case study investigates the persistent issue of underperformance among students in quarterly examinations (Classes IV–X) at Choekhorling Middle Secondary School in Sarpang district, Bhutan. Despite a consistent assessment framework, concerns remain among educators, parents, and the wider community regarding the root causes of students' academic struggles. The research explores the shared yet diverse beliefs and assumptions held by key stakeholders—students, teachers, administrators, and parents—about institutional norms, including school rules, routines, academic workload, and behavioural expectations. These perceptions shape how individuals interact with and respond to the school’s academic environment. To identify contributing factors to student underachievement, the school’s academic committee conducted a focused review using direct feedback from students who failed the quarterly tests. The analysis revealed a misalignment between student experiences and institutional expectations, leading to the formulation of several recommendations. These include revising teaching methodologies, strengthening student support mechanisms, and improving administrative practices. The findings underscore the importance of aligning institutional norms with the realities of student needs to foster improved academic performance.

KEYWORDS:

Bhutan, Case study, Choekhorling Middle Secondary School, factors, feedback, quarterly tests, underperformance

REFERENCES
1) Aronson, J., Zimmerman, J., & Carlos, L. (1999). Improving Student Achievement by Extending School: Is It Just a Matter of Time?

2) Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of school health, 76(8), 397-401.

3) Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company, Newyork.

4) Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.

5) Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of personnel evaluation in education), 21, 5-31.

6) Boaler, J. (2015). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn and love maths. Souvenir Press.

7) Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge international handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement. England, UK: Routledge.

8) Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Corwin Press, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329420

9) Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied developmental science, 24(2), 97-140.

10) Dick, B., & Ferguson, B. J. (2015). Health for the world's adolescents: a second chance in the second decade. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(1), 3-6.

11) Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

12) Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Avalon Publishing.

13) Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British educational research journal, 37(5), 813-828.

14) Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School psychology review, 31(3), 350-365.

15) Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.

16) Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational psychology review, 19, 15-29.

17) Knutson, K. L., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2009). Sociodemographic and behavioral predictors of bed time and wake time among US adolescents aged 15 to 17 years. The Journal of pediatrics, 154(3), 426-430.

18) Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Ascd.

19) Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and instruction, 29, 171-173.

20) Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.

21) Saha, A. (2016). Quality primary education in India: A review and analysis of the National Curriculum Framework 2005 (NCF-2005), with a focus on curriculum reform in primary (Grade IV) education.Slavin, R. E., Karweit, N. L., & Wasik, B. A. (1994). Preventing early school failure. Allyn & Bacon.

22) Shonkoff, J. P., & Garner, A. S. (2012). Committee on psychosocial aspects of child and family health committee on early childhood, adoption, and dependent care section on developmental and behavioral pediatrics the lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246.

23) Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.

24) Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.

25) Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement—still much of a mystery. Educational psychology review, 15, 115-145.

26) UNESCO (2015). Education for all 2000-2015: Achievements and Challenges. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015. Paris, France. Publication by the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. 499 pp. ISBN-978-92-3-10085-0. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, (3).

27) Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

28) Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child development, 73(1), 287-301.

29) Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Volume 08 Issue 05 May 2025

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar