Teachers’ Most Frequently Used ICT Tools for Teaching Language Skills and Components in Moroccan Secondary School EFL Classrooms
Ibn Zohr University, Morocco
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-19

Google Scholar Download Pdf

The present study explored the most frequently used ICT tools for teaching language skills and components in Moroccan secondary school EFL classrooms. This study adopted a mixed-method approach of investigation wherein two instruments were used to collect data: a survey questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. A total number of 80 Moroccan secondary school EFL teachers participated in this study and were selected using convenience sampling. Eight teachers were selected for the interviews through reputational and purposive sampling. Collected data was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Findings revealed that teaching speaking and listening skills received high use of ICT compared to teaching language components and reading and writing which integrated medium and low ICT use, respectively. Findings also showed that computers, laptops, and projectors are the most preferred ICT tools among EFL teachers. This study concluded that teachers’ ICT tools preference seems to have an impact on their ICT use frequency. The latter is also influenced by other factors such the availability/unavailability of ICT equipment/facilities in the schools and training/lack of training on the use of ICT in instruction. A number of recommendations are presented regarding a successful integration of ICT in EFL language teaching in the Moroccan secondary school contexts.


EFL, English, ICT Integration, ICT Tools, Language Skills, Morocco.


1) Ait Hammou, Y., & Elfatihi, M. (2019). Moroccan teachers’ level of ICT integration in secondary EFL classrooms. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 1(3).

2) Alhamd, Alotaibi, Motwaly, & Zyadah (2004). Education in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Alroshed press.

3) Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe: European Schoolnet.

4) Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. T. (1999). Teacher and Teacher-Directed Student Use of Computers. Teaching, Learning and Computing National Survey, Report no. 3. Irvine, California, USA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California. Retrieved September 20, 2009 from: www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/computeruse/

5) Becta (British Educational Communications and Technology Agency). (2004). A Review of the Research Literature on Barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/1/becta_2004_barrierstouptake_litrev.pdf

6) Beggs, T. A. (2000, April 9-11, 2000). Influences and barriers to the adoption of instructional technology. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN.

7) Bush, M., & Mott, J. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology. Educational Technology, 49(1), 3–20.

8) Cox, M., Preston, C., & Cox, K. (1999). What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in their classrooms? A paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University Of Sussex at Brighton. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001304.htm

9) De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & van Merrienboer, J. (Eds.). (2003). Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions. Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier.

10) Dodge, D., Colker, L., & Heroman, C. (2003). The creative curriculum for preschool. Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.

11) Drent, M. (2005). In Transitie: Op Weg Naar Innovatief ICT-gebruik op de PABO [In transition:On the road to innovative use of ICT in teacher education] (doctoral dissertation). Enschede: University of Twente.

12) Drent, M. and M. Meelissen (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?" Computers & Education 51(1), 187-199.

13) Haddad, W.D. & Jurich, S. (2002). ICT for education: Potential and potency. In W.D. Haddad and A. Draxler (Eds.) Technologies for education: Potential, parameters and prospects. UNESCO and Academy for Educational Development, pp. 28-40.

14) Hamidi, F., Meshkat, M., Rezaee, M., & Jafari, M. (2011). Information technology in education. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 369-373.

15) Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Abingdon: Routledge.

16) Hawkridge, D., Jawoski, J., & McMohan, H. (1990). Computers in the Third World Schools: Examples, Experiences and Issues, London.

17) Gomes, C. (2005). Integration of ICT in science teaching: A study performed in Azores, Portugal. Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies.

18) Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2001). Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning. Houghton Muffin Company. USA.

19) Laferriere, T, Breleux, A., & Bracewell, R. (1999). Benefits of using information and communication Technologies (ICT) for teaching and learning in k-12/13

20) Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14759390000200096#preview

21) Nir-Gal, O., & Klein, P. (2004). Computers for cognitive development in early childhood – The teacher’s role in the computer-learning environment. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 16, 97–119.

22) O’Hara, M. (2008). Young children, learning and ICT: A case study in the UK maintained sector. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 29–40.

23) Ӧzden, M. (2007). Problems with science and technology education in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 157-161.

24) Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism, techno centric thinking. Educational researcher Journal, 16(1), 22-30. Retrieved 7 October, 2006 from http:// www.http:// links.\jstor.org

25) Paul, C. (2002). Literature Review: The impact of ICT on learning and teaching. Retrieved 7 October, 2006 from http://www.det.wa.edu.au/education/cmiseval/downloads/pd/impactreview.pdf

26) Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.

27) Plomp, Tj., ten Brummelhis, A.C.A., & Rapmund, R. (1996). Teaching and Learning for the Future. Report of the Committee on MultiMedia in Teacher Training (COMMITT). Den Haag: SDU.

28) Rahimi, M. & Yadollahi, S. (2011). ICT use in EFL classes: A focus on EFL teachers’ characteristics. World Journal of English Language, 1(2), 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v1n2p17

29) Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N. (2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 48(6), 32–39.

30) Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2001). Computers in early childhood mathematics. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Panel Discussion, Seattle, WA.

31) Toprakci, E. (2006). Obstacles at integration of schools into information and communication technologies by taking into consideration the opinions of the teachers and principals of primary and secondary schools in Turkey. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), 9(1), 1-16.

32) Volman, M. and van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071004613

33) Voogt, J. (2003). Consequences of ICT for Aims, Contents, Processes and Environments of Learning. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (blz. 217–236). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

34) Voogt, J., & Pelgrum, H. (2005). ICT and Curriculum changed. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 1 (2), 157-175. Retrieved May 12, 2006, www.humantechnology.jyu.fi

35) Watson, D.M. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technology. 6(4): 251-266. Retrieved 10 July, 2007, from http://www.springerlink.com/content

36) Watson, S. L. and W. R. Watson (2011). The Role of Technology and Computer-Based Instruction in a Disadvantaged Alternative School's Culture of Learning,Computers in the Schools 28(1): 39-55.

37) Welle-Strand, A. (1991). Evaluation of the Norwegian Program of Action: the impact of computers in the classroom and how school learn. Computers and Educational, 16(1), 29-35.

38) Yang, S. C., and Huang, Y. F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085-1103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.009

39) Zamani, B. E. (2010). Successful implementation factors for using computers in Iranian schools during one decade (1995–2005). Computers & Education, 54(1), 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.004


Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar