¹Nor Sa’adah Jamaluddin, ²Suhaida Abd. Kadir,³ Siti Noormi Alias, ⁴Arnida Abdullah

¹Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management and Economics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia

^1,2,3,4Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-26

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Education is the backbone of a country and it contributes towards economic development by enhancing individual’s market value. Therefore, learners’ achievement in learning and the factor influencing it such as application of learning strategies must be focused on in order to develop high market value among learners. The focus of this study is to review learning strategies that influence learning outcomes. This paper explores the meaning of learning strategies by various researchers. At the same time, it also explores the relationship between dimensions of learning strategies towards learning outcomes and the dimensions are believed to be capable of affecting academic performance. It is concluded that suitable and good learning strategies can lead towards successfulness in learning and academic performance. The findings of previous researchers are also included to support the arguments used in this study.

KEYWORDS:

Learning strategies, time management, motivational, attitude, academic performance

REFERENCES

1) Abu, N. E., & Eu L. K. (2014). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian Matematik Tambahan tingkatan 4. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2 (1).

2) Alkharusi, H. A., Sulaimani, H. A., & Neisler, O. (2019). Predicting critical thinking ability of Sultan Qaboos university students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 491-504. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12231a.

3) Anderson, O. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. A Bridged Edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

4) Candra, & Retnawati, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of constructivism learning implementation towards the learning outcomes on civic education lesson. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 835-846. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13256a.

5) Che Ahmad, C. N., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2013). Persekitaran Pembelajaran Aspek Fizikal dan Psikososial. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

6) Chen, C., Fan, J., & Jury, M. (2017). Are perceived learning environments related to subjective well-being? A visit to university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.001.

7) Curriculum Development Division (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

8) Curriculum Development Division (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (DSKP) Mata Pelajaran Prinsip Perakaunan. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

9) Dorit, M., & Barry J. F. (2005). An online questionnaire for evaluating students’ and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments. Research in Science Education, 35, 221–244. DOI: http://10.1007/s11165-005-2148- 3.

10) Dumford, A. D., Cogswell, C. A., & Miller, A. L. (2016a). The who, what, and where of learning strategies. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 16 (1), 72– 88.

11) Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. I. (2020). PBLPOE: a learning model to enhance students’ critical thinking skills and scientific attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1327a

12) Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.

13) Gasser, L., Grutter, J., Buholzer, A., & Wettstein, A., (2018). Emotionally supportive classroom interactions and students' perceptions of their teachers as caring. Learning and Instruction, 54, (2018), 82-92.

14) Hashim, N., Kee, C. P., & Abdul Rahman, M. F. (2016). STOPS: Mengungkai isu kebolehpasaran graduan di Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi, Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32 (2), 139–164.

15) Hassan, A., & Mohd, A. (1999). Komunikasi untuk guru. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

16) Husamah, Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE learning model: Improving higher order thinking skills of Biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249264. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11217a.

17) Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Environmental learning based on higher order thinking skills: A needs assessment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1 (1), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i1.1389.

18) Ishak, M. N., & Mohammad, N. S. (2001). Gaya pertautan dan komitmen terhadap profesion perguruan di kalangan guru guru pelatih. Kertas Kerja International Conference on Challenges and prospects in teacher education. Shah Alam: Concorde Hotel.

19) Jamaluddin, N. S., Kadir, S. A., Alias, S. N., & Abdullah, A. (2021). A Review of Psychosocial Learning Environment. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(3), 801–805.

20) Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of Teaching (Fifth Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

21) Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dan Perlaksanaan KBAT di Sekolah. Buletin Anjakan, 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.padu.edu.my/files/Anjakan_Mac_2015.pdf

22) Kock, A. D., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2004). New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 141– 170. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074002141.

23) Lawrence. E., & James, E. (2016). Constructivist approaches: An emerging paradigm for the teaching and learning of business education. Nigerian Journal of Business Education, Volume 3, No 1, 2016.

24) Marzano, R. J. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

25) Mohd Nadzir, Z. (2010). Hubungan Antara Persepsi Pelajar Tentang Persekitaran Sekolah, Motivasi Akademik dan Strategi Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains, [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].

26) Mohd Nadzir, Z. (2010). Hubungan antara persepsi pelajar tentang persekitaran sekolah, motivasi akademik dan strategi pembelajaran dengan pencapaian dalam mata pelajaran Sains, [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].

27) Mohebali, S., Maghsoudy, S., Doulati, F. A. (2020). Developing a coupled environmental impact assessment (C-EIA) method with sustainable development approach for environmental analysis in coal industries. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 6799–6830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00513-2.

28) Mokhtar, S. B. (2012). Faktor persekitaran pembelajaran, pendekatan pembelajaran dan kemahiran generik dalam kalangan pelajar politeknik, [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].

29) Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating Educational Environments: Procedures, Measures, Findings and Polic Implications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

30) Newmann, F. M. (1990). higher order thinking in teaching social studies: A rationale for the assessment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22 (1), 41- 56.

31) Nold, H. (2017). Using critical thinking teaching methods to increase student success: An action research project. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29 (1), 1732.

32) Nor, M. R. (2005). Perkaitan di antara budaya sekolah dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar di Negeri Sembilan, [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].

33) Okula, S. (1999). Creating a positive school culture; strategies that work. Business Education Forum, 54 (2), 7-13.

34) Onosko, J. J., & Newmann, F. M. (1994). Creating more thoughtful learning environments, In J.N.Mangieri & C.C. Block (Eds.). Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

35) Pereira, E. T., Villas-Boas, M., & Rebelo, C. C. (2019). Does entrepreneurship and innovative education matter to increase employability skills: A framework based on the evidence from five European countries. In L. Carvalho, & A. Daniel (Eds.), Global Considerations in Entrepreneurship Education and Training (pp. 218-231). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225- 76754.ch013.

36) Puteh, M., Adnan, M., Ibrahim, M. H., Mohamed Noh, N., & Che Ahmad, C. N., (2014). An analysis of comfortable teaching and learning environment: Community response to climate change in school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.209.

37) Razak, A. R. J. (2015). Persepsi Pelajar terhadap Kaedah Pengajaran Guru dan Persekitaran Pembelajaran Kemahiran Hidup serta Hubungannya dengan Kemahiran Amali Pelajar, [Tesis Ijazah Sarjana, Universiti Putra Malaysia].

38) Richardson, C., & Mishra, P., (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54.

39) Sanip, F. A., & Che Ahmad, C. N. (2014). Kesedaran strategi metakognitif dan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam kalangan pelajar Biologi. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 15.

40) Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., & Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. School Psychology International, 38 (2), 201–218.

41) Short, M. N., & Keller-Bell, Y. (2019). Essential skills for the 21st century workforce. In J. Keengwe, & R. Byamukama (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Promoting Higher-Order Skills and Global Competencies in Life and Work (pp. 134- 147). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6331-0.ch009.

42) Suardana, I N., Redhana, I W., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Selamat, I N. (2018). Students’ critical thinking skills in chemistry learning using local culture-based 7E learning cycle model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11227a.

43) Suprapto, E., Fahrizal, F., Priyono, P., & Basri, K., (2017). The application of problem-based learning strategy to increase high order thinking skills of senior vocational school students. International Education Studies, 10 (6), 123. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p123.

44) Tasker, R. (1992). Effective teaching: What can a constructivist view of learning offer. The Australian Science Teacher Journal, 38, 25-34.

45) Tessmer, M., & Harris, D. (1992). Analyzing the instructional setting: Environmental analysis. London/Bristol, PA: Kogan Page/Taylor and Francis.

46) Thorndike, R. L. (1898). Reliability. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: an international handbook (pp. 330–343). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

47) Underbakke, M., Borg, J. M., & Peterson, D. (1993). researching and developing the knowledge base for teaching higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, Vol. 32, No. 3, 138-146.

48) Vinales, J. J. (2015). Learning styles: A guide for mentors. British Journal of Nursing, 24 (8), 454–457.

49) Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society - The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

50) Wan, N. W. S., Abdul Ghani, K., & Lubis, M. A. (2011). Persekitaran pembelajaran kefahaman bacaan Bahasa Arab dalam kalangan murid J-Qaf. The Journal Online of Islamic, 1974, 1–7.

51) Wang, Y. A., & Mijke, R. (2021). Power Analysis for parameter estimation in structural equation modeling: A discussion and tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Vol. 4(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1177/2515245920918253.

52) Wilkin, C. L. (2017). Enhancing critical thinking: accounting students’ perceptions. Education + Training, 59 (1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2015-0007.

53) Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas; An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72 (2), 131-175.

54) Yahya, M., & Sa'ari, C. Z. (2015). Sistem pendidikan negara abad ke 21 Brunei Darussalam dalam melestari ketamadunan islam Negara Zikr: Cabaran dan harapan. Afkar, 16, 61–92.

55) Yee, M. H., Md Yunos, J., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Tee, T. K., & Mohamad, M. M. (2015). Disparity of learning styles and higher order thinking skills among technical students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 143 – 152.

56) Yurniwati, & Soleh, D. A. (2020). The effectiveness of computer-based problem solving to improve higher order thinking skills on prospective teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13227a.

57) Yusof, M. K. (2017). Laporan Tahunan 2016 (Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my.

58) Zuhairi, F. F. M., Che Ibrahim, C. K. I., & Belayutham, S. (2018). Analysis of employability skills for future civil engineers in Malaysian construction industry. Int. J. Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, Vol. 28, Nos. 3/4, pp.310–336.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2021