DECEMBER 2021

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2021
The Role of Prosodic Factors in Determining The Meaning of The Text
Khatira Avaz Gojayeva
Azerbaijan University of Languages, Phonetics department
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-65

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Intonation is a very complex language unit. It has many functions, and these functions are performed by different phonetic events:
1. A phonetic event that performs the attitude function. This function reflects attitude, emotion, and different phonetic events. For example, depending on the context of the speech and the current situation of the speaker, you can use falling intonation, rising intonation, falling-rising intonation, rising-falling tones.
2. A phonetic event that performs an accentual function. This term is used in connection with an accent. Some phonetics also use stress instead of accent. In this function, the emphasis falls on the last lexical word, and the phonetic event of accentuation and clarification of intonation is performed.
3. A phonetic event that performs a grammatical function. In this function, tone boundaries are defined by intonation. With the help of this phonetic phenomenon, the listener can better recognize the grammar and syntactic structure of what is being said.
4. A phonetic event that performs a discourse function. The main task of this phonetic event is to convey to the listener what "new" information is. An eye-catching tonic accent is placed on the appropriate syllable of a particular sound.

KEYWORDS:

intonation, text, prosodic, tone, movement, new, transmitted, information

REFERENCES

1) Brown G, Yule G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2) Brazil D., M.Coulthard, C.Johns. (1980) Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman Higher Education.

3) Brown G., Yule G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4) Chafe W. (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

5) Chomsky N. (1969) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. England, MIT Press.

6) Coulthard R.M. (1977) An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.

7) Craig R.T. (2001) Communication. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. / ed. T.O.Sloane. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125- 137.

8) Crystal D. (1995) The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9) Chafe W.L. (1974) Language and consciousness. Chicago: Universety of Chicago Press.

10) Chafe W.L. (1979) The flow of thought and the flow of language. in (ed) T.Givon. Chicago: Universety of Chicago Press.

11) Dale. R. (1990) Generating Recipes: An Overview of Opicure. R.Dale, C.Mellish and M.Zock. London: Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Academic Press.

12) Kukharaenko V.A. (1986) A Book of Practice in Stylistics. Moscow: New Press.

13) Scott, D., C.S.de Souza. (1990) Getting the Message Across in RST-based Text Generation. London: Current Research in Natural Language Generation Academic Press.

14) Mammadov A., Mammadov M. (2010) Cognitive perspectives of discourse analysis.Baku: Chashioglu

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar