Current

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2021
The Comparison of Civics Education Learning Outcomes in Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning on Cadets of Aviation Polytechnic of Surabaya
1Sudrajat, 2Luthfiyah Nurlaila, 3Mustaji, 4Fajar Arianto
1,2,3,4Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i3-34

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the learning outcomes of cadets who were treated with collaborative learning and cooperative learning in aviation polytechnic. The research subjects were ninety-three cadets of the Aviation Polytechnic of Surabaya, divided into a collaborative learning class and a cooperative learning class. The analysis technique was used to compare the two groups calculated statistically. The analysis results showed cadets treated with cooperative learning obtained better learning outcomes than with collaborative learning. Cadets preferred cooperative learning because they were used to collaborating in the learning process in the classroom.

KEYWORDS

collaborative learning, cooperative learning, learning outcome, vocational education

REFERENCES

1) Ahn, B., & Nelson, M. (2018). Assessment of the effects of using the cooperative learning pedagogy in a hybrid mechanics of materials course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 210-226.

2) Anderson, J. (2019). Cooperative learning: principles and practice. English Teaching professional, 4-6.

3) Aziz, Z., & Hossain, M. A. (2010). A comparison of cooperative learning and conventional teaching on students’ achievement in secondary mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53-62.

4) Berthold, K., Nuckles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? he role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction , 564-577.

5) Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve.

6) Butera, F., & Buchs, C. (2019). Social Interdependence and the Promotion of Cooperative Learning. In K. Sassenberg, & M. L. Vliek, Social Psychology in Action (pp. 111-127). Switzerland: Springer.

7) Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction. New York: Pearson.

8) Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do yuo mean by collaborative leraning? In P. Dillenbourg, Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.

9) Egger, J. O. (2019). Effects of cooperative learning on preservice elementary teachers’ interest in and integration of music into core academic subjects . International Journal of Music Education, 608-621 .

10) Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

11) Kimmelmann, N., & Lang, J. (2018). Linkage within teacher education: cooperative learning of teachers and student teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-13.

12) Koper, R. (2006). Current Research in Learning Design . Source: Journal of Educational Technology & Society , 13-22.

13) Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking Together and Alone. Educational Researcher, 46-53.

14) Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 486-490.

15) Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 491 – 495.

16) Lundgren, L. (1994). Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom: Glencoe Science Professional Series. Westerville: Glencoe.

17) Lyle, K. S., & Robinson, W. R. (2001). Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 442-468.

18) Munir, M., Baroutian, S., Young, B. R., & Carter, S. (2018). Flipped Classroom with Cooperative Learning as a Cornerstone. Education for Chemical Engineers, 1-9.

19) Nahdi, D. S., & Juju. (2016). Peningkatan KemampuanSelf-Regulated Learning (SRL) Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 1-13.

20) Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, and Interaction: Three Communicative Strands in the Language Classroom . The Modern Language Journal , 443-456.

21) Pai, H.-H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 79–102.

22) Panhwar, A. H., Gopang, A. S., Chachar, Z. A., & Baloch, S. (2017). Differentiating Cooperative Learning and Collaborative Learning: What Is Fit for Pakistani Higher Education? International Journal of English Linguistics, 119-126.

23) Panitz, T. (1999, March 17). Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning. Retrieved from ERIC: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED448443

24) Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2010). What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning? Educational Researcher, 4-15.

25) Raviv, A., Cohen, S., & Aflalo, E. (2017). How Should Students Learn in the School Science Laboratory? The Benefits of Cooperative Learning. Research in Science Education, 331–345.

26) Ryzin, M. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2019). Effects of cooperative learning on peer relations, empathy, and bullying in middle school. Aggressive Behavior, 643-651.

27) Sanjaya, W. (2015). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

28) Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology : theory and practice . New York: Pearson.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar