Current

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2021
The Relationship Between the Critical Factors for Knowledge Management in Supply Chain Efficiency Amol's Kalleh Dairy Company
Seyedeh Malihe Mohammadi Takami
Faculty of Management, Department of Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran,
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i3-09

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Organizations that operate in a variable and complex, competitive environment are continually looking for a sustainable competitive advantage. In this regard, knowledge management is one of the most critical factors affecting the success of organizations. Relying on knowledge and knowledge management, organizations can make more reasonable decisions and achieve sustainable development. Therefore, knowledge management is one of the most influential and essential factors in comprehensive development and gaining a more significant market share. This study's primary purpose was to investigate the relationship between critical aspects of knowledge management on Kale Amol Dairy Products Company's supply chain productivity. Five main factors of organizational strategy, organizational structure, knowledge team, knowledge map, and knowledge audit were used as independent variables to achieve this goal. The research method was a correlation, and data collection tools were library and internet resources. The statistical population consisted of high and middle-class managers and staff members involved in knowledge management and supply chain in Amol Calais Dairy Products Company, of which 58 were. Chang china et al. standard questionnaire was used to measure the variables, and SPSS software was used to analyze the statistical data. Descriptive statistics were used for the frequency of data. The Pearson correlation test was used to determine the relationship between variables, and the Friedman test was used to prioritize the variables. After data analysis, it was found that there is a relationship between all independent variables and supply chain productivity. The knowledge map variable had the highest and organizational strategy variable with the lowest relationship with the dependent variable among independent variables.

REFERENCES

1. Chang, Tsung-Han- Wang, Tien-Chin, Using the fuzzy multi-criteria making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management, Information sciences, An international journal, Vol.179,2009.

2. Darroch J, Mc Naughton R, Examining the link between knowledge management practices & types of innovation, Journal of intellectual capital, Vol.3. No.3,2010.

3. Akhavan, P & et al., Identification of knowledge management critical success factors in Iranian academic research centres, Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, Vol٢. No. ٤,2009.

4. Hult, G. T. M & et al., Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28,2007.

5. Akhavan, P. and Jafari, M, Critical issues for knowledge management implementation at a national level, The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. ٦٣, No. ١,2006.

6. Akhavan, P. and Jafari, M, Critical issues for knowledge management implementation at a national level, The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. ٦٣, No. ١,2006.

7. Wu, C, Knowledge creation in a supply chain, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol.13, No3,2008.

8. Wang. C& et al., A conceptual case-based model for knowledge sharing among supply chain members, Business Process Management Journal, Vol.14,2008.

9. Wong, K.Y, Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises, Industrial management & Data systems, Vol.105, No.3,2005.

10. Marwick, Kiessling, Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy, Journal of world business, Vol.44,2009.

11. Sotriakoa, Tatiana- Mary, Zeppou, MATE model: A strategic knowledge management technique on the chessboard of public- sector modernization, Management decision, Vol.42,2004.

12. Tiwana, A. The knowledge management Toolkit: Practical techniques for building a knowledge management system, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,2007.

13. Broadberry a.Stephen N., Irwin.Douglas A, Labor productivity in the United States and the United Kingdom during the nineteenth century, Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 43,2006.

14. Fernandez, Irmabecerra- Leidner, Dorothy, Knowledge management: An evolutionary view, Advances in management information systems,2008.

15. Gatora, N. The evaluation of logistics and the management discipline's supply chain, Springer,1995.

16. Chang, Tsung-Han- Wang, Tien-Chin, Using the fuzzy multi-criteria making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management, Information sciences, An international journal, Vol.179,2009.

17. Dalkir, Kimiz, Knowledge management in theory and practice, Elsevier butter worth-Heinemann publications,2005.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar