George Nicholas Huwae

Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i4-30

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This scientific paper discusses how tattoo edwomen interact in social life with the majority of people having a negative view of tattoo images. Atattooed woman interacts socially and culturally. It is in this social space that she negotiates with her social world, in various ways, such as allowing the tattoo image on her body to be openly seen, or she tries to cover it up when the woman considers negative or positive views of the tattoo images on some parts of her body The approach used to understand tattooed women's interactions with their social life was the Looking Glass Self proposed by Charles Horton Cooley, which discusses how the looking glass self analogy affects the developmnet of a person's self-concept.

Thiswas a qualitative study designedto answer the problem of how tattooed women interact with their socio-cultural world which has positive and negative views. Qualitative method of a tattooed woman life story was applied to explore experiences regarding their social interactions. This study involved 3 case studies to answer such problem. This study found that there were different negotiation processes between a tattooed woman andanother, alongwithdifferent cases of tattoo image ownership.

KEYWORDS

Self-Image, Social Interaction, Tattoo

REFERENCES

1) Ahmadi, D. (2008). Interaksi Simbolik: Suatu Pengantar. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i2.1115

2) Arifin, J., & Suardi, S. (2017). Stigmatisasi dan Perilaku Diskriminatif pada Perempuan Bertato. Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.26618/equilibrium.v3i1.507

3) Ayun, P. Q. (2015). Fenomena Remaja Menggunakan Media Sosial dalam Membentuk Identitas. CHANNEL Jurnal Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v3i2.3270

4) Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

5) Cooley, C. H. (2017). Human nature and the social order. Human Nature and the Social Order. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203789513

6) Cremationink Ink. (2021). The Asal Usul Dari Tato. Retrieved from https://cremationink.com/id/the-tattoo-process/theorigins- of-tattooing/

7) Gentles-Peart, K. (2015). The Cosmetic Gaze: Body Modification and the Construction of Beauty. Visual Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1102066

8) Gumelar, R. G., & Mukhroman, I. (2015). TATO: REPRESENTATIF GENDER DALAM PERSPEKTIF FEMINISME. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.vol3n1.9

9) Gunawan Imam. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktek. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.

10) Indra, R. (2013). Perempuan Bertato itu Seksi?

11) Jalaludin Rakhmat. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi. (Tjun Surjaman, Ed.) (24th ed.). Bandung: Rosda Karya.

12) Kusmana, K. (2014). Menimbang Kodrat Perempuan antara Nilai Budaya dan Kategori Analisis. Refleksi. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v13i6.1000

13) Liga, A. J. (2015). TATO DALAM KEHIDUPAN REMAJA (STUDI KASUS REMAJA PENGGUNA TATO DIKOTA PEKANBARU). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 2(2), 14. Retrieved from https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFSIP/article/view/7256/6936

14) Lin, L., Donatinus BSEP, & Musa, P. (2020). Tato Sebagai Gaya Hidup Kaum Perempuan Perkotaan. Balale’ Jurnal Antropologi, 1(2), 82–90. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/BALELE/article/view/43407

15) Marianto, M. D., & Syamsul Barry. (2000). Tato. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Institute Seni Indonesia.

16) Morissan. (2009). Teori Komunikasi Organisasi (1st ed.). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

17) Morissan, Wardhani, A. C., & U, F. H. (2010). Teori Komunikasi Massa : Media, Budaya, dan Masyarakat (1st ed.). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

18) Pradita, M. E. (2013). Tato Sebagai Sebuah Media Komunikasi Non Verbal Suku Dayak Bahau. EJournal Sosiatri- Sosiologi (Fisip-Unmul.Ac.Id).

19) Puspa, R. J. S., Darmawan, A., & Pratiwi, N. M. I. (2015). Presepsi Mahasiwa Terhadap Tattoo Di Tubuh Manusia: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Perempuan Fisip Untag Surabaya. Jurnal Representamen, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v1i02.1444

20) Putra, A. S., & Ratmanto, T. (2019). Media dan Upaya Mempertahankan Tradisi dan Nilai-nilai Adat. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v7i1.13018

21) Sakti, B. C., & Yulianto, M. (2013). Penggunaan Media Sosial Instagram Dalam Pembentukan Identitas Diri Remaja. Interaksi-Online.

22) Santoso, W. A. (2017). Memahami Power Dan Komunikasi Identitas Diri Melalui Tato. Interaksi Online, 5(3), 11. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/16658/16028

23) Setiawan, I. N. A. F., & Jayanegara, I. N. (2016). Kajian Motivasi Tato Rangda pada Orang Bali. Jurnal Studi Kultural, 1(1), 28–34. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/223833-kajian-motivasi-tato-rangda-pada-orangb. pdf

24) Soeprapto, R. (2002). Interaksionisme Simbolik: Perspektif Sosiologi Modern (Yogyakarta). Pustaka Pelajar.

25) Sumardjo, J. (2000). Filsafat Seni. Bandung: ITB.

26) Sutopo, H. B. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Aplikasinya dalam Penelitian.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2021