Current

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2021
Implementation of Mediation as an Alternative for Medical Dispute Resolution in Hospitals Based on Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health
1Lina Herlina,2 St. Laksanto Utomo
1 ,2Faculty of Law, Jakarta Veterans National Development University, Fatmawati Raya Hospital, South Jakarta City 12450.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i6-17

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The Law on Health does not explicitly explain mediation in resolving a dispute between a doctor and a patient, so there are still many disputes that go directly to litigation, so the number of cases piles up in court. The method used in this paper uses a normative legal type method, with a statutory approach, using primary legal materials, by collecting data by literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods. Disciplinary sanctions imposed on violations of physician discipline as stated in Law No. 29 of 2004 article 69 in the form of a written warning, revocation of the registration certificate or practice license, and the obligation to attend medical or dental education.

KEYWORDS:

Mediation, Dispute Resolution, Medical Malpractice.

REFERENCES:

Regulations:
1) Article 28 H Paragraphs (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution Amendments

2) Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health.

3) Law No. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice.

4) Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

5) Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.

6) The Regulation of the Supreme Court (PERMA) No.1 of 2008 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts.

7) The Regulation of the Supreme Court (PERMA) No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court.
Book:
1) Amiruddin & Zainal asikin, 2012, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada, hlm. 118.

2) Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2004, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada, hlm. 42.

3) D.Y Witanto, 2011, Hukum Acara Mediasi, Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta.

4) Dean G Pruitt & Z. Rubin, 2004, Konflik Sosial, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar, hlm. 4-6.

5) Gunawan Widjaja, 2005, Seri Hukum Bisnis Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, hlm. 90.

6) Johnny Ibrahim, 2006, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif , Malang : Bayumedia Publishing, hlm. 392.

7) Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia, 2006, Standard Pendidikan Profesi Dokter, Jakarta : Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia, hlm. 24.

8) M. Nurdin, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pasien Atas Korban Malpraktek Kedokteran, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Samudra, Vol. 10, No. 01, 2015, hlm. 10.

9) Raisul Muttaqien, 2011, Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara, Bandung : Nusa Media, hlm.i7.

10) Soerjono Soekarto & Sri Mamudji, 2010, Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta : Rajawali Press, Cetakan Ke VIII, hlm. 13.
Journals and Scientific Works:

1) Gst Agung Chandra Kumala Dewi, Made Gde Subha Karma Resen, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Dokter Serta Dasar Alasan Peniadaan Pidana Malpraktek Medis, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Vol. 07, No. 05, 2018, hlm. 8.

2) Quoted from “Best practice dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kesehatan, Created by Drg. Suryono, SH, Ph.D - Pusat Mediasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta”. (Pada tanggal 02 april 2021 pukul 22.00 wib)

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar