VOlUME 04 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2021
Improving Classroom Interaction in Reading Classes for Students at Hanoi University of Home Affairs: An Action Research
Luu Thi Kim Que, M.A.
Ha Noi University of Home Affairs, Vietnam

Google Scholar Download Pdf

Classroom interaction is obviously of crucial significance to English language teaching and learning. Many language teachers and researchers have made great efforts to find out ways to create interactive classroom environment that involve both teachers and learners’ contributions during the whole process of teaching and learning. The study was conducted to explore classroom interaction in an English foreign language class. Questionnaire and classroom observation were used for data collecting. The results showed that the students participated more actively in reading lessons. Moreover, they developed a positive attitude towards classroom interaction and classroom interaction strategies. The findings demonstrated that increasing students’ motivation, designing interactive reading tasks, and applying appropriate techniques for classroom interaction facilitated and improved classroom interaction.


classroom interaction, cooperative learning, learning techniques


1) Allwright, D. (1984b). Why don’t learner learn what teachers teach? The interaction hypothesis. In S. Little (Ed.). Language learning in formal and informal contexts, (pp.3-18). Dublin: BAAL/IRAAL.

2) Barnes, D. (1969). Language in the secondary classroom. In D. Barners, J. Britton & H. Roses (Eds.). Language, the learner, and the school (pp. 11-77). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

3) Brown, H. D. (l 994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

4) Celce-Murcia, M. (1989). Interaction and communication in the TESOL classroom. A Forum Anthology, 4, 25-31.

5) Chaudron, C. (1993). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6) Ellis, R, (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7) Ford, E. (1991). Criteria for developing an observation scheme for cooperative language learning. Modern Language Journal, 48(1), 45-63.

8) Hill. J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186-203.

9) Holland, R., & Shortall, T. (1997). Classroom research and research methods. Birmingham: The Center for English Language Studies.

10) Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1999). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1 ), 69-98.

11) Korst, T. (1997). Answer, please answer! A perspective on Japanese university student silent response to questions. Japanese Association for Language Teaching Journal, 19(2), 279-291.

12) Long, M. H. (1981). Input, Interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Wintiz (Ed.). Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-278). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Science.

13) Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/ non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.

14) Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreign talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. TESOL Quarterly.

15) Loucky, J. P. (2005). Combining Intensive and Extensive reading strategies with cooperative and communicative learning activities. Asia, 3(2).

16) Lynch, T. (1991). Questioning roles in the classroom. ELT Journal, 43(3), 201-210.

17) Malamath-Thomas, A. (1987). Classroom interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18) Nafrina, J. K. (2007). The teacher and learner talk in the classroom interaction of grade viii: A SMP N 2 cepiring kendal. Semarang State University.

19) Odekunle, O. A. (2005). Patterns of classroom interaction in comprehension classes in selected secondary schools in Ibadan. University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

20) Pica, T. & Long, M. H. (1986). The classroom linguistic and conversational performance of experienced and inexperienced teachers. In R., Day (Ed.), Talking to learn. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.

21) Pica, T. & Doughty, C. (1988). Variations in classroom interaction as function of participation patter task. In J. Fine (Ed.). Second language discourse: A textbook of current research. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

22) Rao, Z. (1996). Reconciling communicative approaches to the teaching of English with traditional Chinese methods. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(4), 458-471.

23) Richards, J. C. & Lockart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24) Rivers, W. M. (Ed.). (1987). Interactive language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

25) Shomoossi, N. (2004). The effects of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFL classroom interaction. Retrieved September 9, 2020 from

26) number2.

27) Thompson, G. (1997). Training teachers to ask questions. ELT Journal, 51, 99-105.

28) Thornbury, S. (1996). Teachers research teacher talk. ELT Journal, 50(4), 279-289.

29) Tsui, A.B.M. (1995). Introducing classroom interaction. London: Penguin English.

30) Ur, P. (2000). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31) Xiao, Y. (2006). Teacher talk and EFL in university classroom. Chongqing Normal University & Yangtze Normal University.

32) Zhou, X. Zhou, Y. (2002). Study of teacher talk in English language classrooms at a university level. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 34(1), 59-68

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar