July 2021

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021
Legal Consequences of The Discrepancy on Construction of Land Sale And Purchase Deed Towards The Procedure For Dedication (Analysis of The Jurisdiction of The Supreme Court Number-967k/Pdt/2010)
1Didik Setyawan , 2Suherman
1Master Program of Law, Faculty of Law, State University of Veteran Jakarta
2Lecturer of Postgraduate Masters in Law, State University of Veteran Jakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i7-16

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the legal consequences and causative factors which lead the construction of land sale and purchase deed was not in accordance with procedures based on analysis of the Supreme Court's decision number-967K/Pdt/2010. In this case it is known that the factor that cause the land dispute is due to PPAT did not pre-check at the Land Office regarding the suitability of land rights certificate, the construction of PPAT deed was not attended by the parties who carried out the concerned legal act and was not witnessed by at least two witnesses who, according to the provisions of prevailing regulations, and did not read the deed to the concerned parties. With regards to the case that the construction of land sale and purchase deed was not in accordance with related procedure, it is necessary to receive legal consequences in the form of: PPAT can be dishonorably dismissed from his position and subject to administrative sanctions without reducing the possibility of being sued for compensation by parties who suffer losses and resulted in the degradation of the power of proof becomes a private deed because it does not meet the requirements determined by law and or other regulations.

KEYWORDS:

Judicial Review, Supreme Court, PPAT

REFERENCES

1) Mira Novana Ardani, “Tantangan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pemberian Kepastian Hukum”, Jurnal Gema Keadilan, Volume 6, Edisi III, 2019, hlm. 270

2) Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 967k/Pdt/2010

3) Septina Marryanti dan Yudha Purbawa, “Optimalisasi Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap”, Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, Volume 4, No 2, hlm. 202, November 2018, hlm. 192

4) Soerjono soekanto, Sri Mamudji, “Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat” (Jakarta : Rajawali Pers, 2006) hlm. 13

5) Zainuddin, Zaki Ulya Zainuddin, “Domein Verklaring Dalam Pendayagunaan Tanah Di Aceh”, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2018, hlm. 140

6) Mira Novana Ardani, “The Challenges of Implementing Complete Systematic Land Registration Activities in Order to Realize the Provision of Legal Certainty”, Echo Justice Journal, Volume 6, Edition III, 2019, p. 270

7) Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 967k/Pdt/2010

8) Septina Marryanti and Yudha Purbawa, “Optimization of Factors Affecting the Success of Complete Systematic Land Registration”, Journal of Agrarian and Land Affairs, Volume 4, No. 2, p. 202, November 2018, p. 192

9) Soerjono soekanto, Sri Mamudji, “Normative Legal Research: A Brief Overview” (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2006) p. 13

10) Zainuddin, Zaki Ulya Zainuddin, "Domein Verklaring in Land Utilization in Aceh", Journal of Samudra Justice Law, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2018, p. 140

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar