Aryaguna

Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta Jl. R.S. Fatmawati No. 1 South Jakarta 12450

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i7-27

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The trial of corruption cases by teleconference is very vulnerable to manipulation of the trial or game cases that can obscure or change the actual facts, internet network connections. In addition, with atrial teleconference for judges, public prosecutors and legal advisors cannot see the direct response of the examined parties to determine the gesture in answering and giving reasons in answering questions, making it difficult to catch whether there has been a blurring of facts or not. The problems of this research are 1) How is the evidence in the trial of corruption cases by teleconference during the COVID-19 pandemic? 2) How should a case prove a corruption case teleconference during the COVID-19 pandemic? By using normative juridical research methods, it is known that 1) Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 in principle has accommodated the process of evidentiary the trial of corruption cases and is legal according to law, but in practice not all cases of corruption can be proven by teleconference. 2) The process of evidentiary the trial of corruption cases by teleconference in the COVID-19 pandemic situation that should be carried out is optional so that in practice it does not need to be carried out by teleconference, this returns to the weight of the case being handled.

Keywords

Evidence, Teleconference, Corruption, Covid-19

REFERENCES

Books :
1) Hamzah Andi, 2014, Hukum Acara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

2) Mulyadi Lilik, 2007, Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Alumni, Bandung

3) Soekanto Soerjono, 1985, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, PT Raja Grafinfo Persada, Jakarta

4) Subekti, 2015, Hukum Pembuktian, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta

5) Yahya Harahap M., 2000, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Journal:
1) Astari Amelia Putri Anggi & Ali Dahlan, Keabsahan Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Dalam Sidang Yang Dilaksanakan Via Daring (Video Conference) Dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19, Syiah Kuala Law Journal, Volume 4, 2020

2) Damayanti, Ruth Marina, Legalitas Keterangan Saksi Melalui Teleconference Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana, (Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014

3) Rahmaningsih Nugroho Dewi & Suteki S., Membangun Budaya Hukum Persidangan Virtual (Studi Perkembangan Sidang Tindak Pidana Via Telekonferensi, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 2, Nomor 3, 2020
Law :
1) Law Number 8 Year 1981 About Criminal Procedure Law

2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2020 concerning Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Courts Electronically
Internet:
1) https://fisip.ui.ac.id/peradilan-online-dan-isu-fair-trial/ accessed 10 May 2021

2) https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5f7e290eb1565/begini-prosedur-persidangan-perkara-pidana-secara-online/ accsesed 22 February 2021

3) https://www.kemkes.go.id/article/view/20030400008/FAQ-Coronavirus.html accessed 6 April 202

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021