July 2021

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021
Comparison of First to File Doctrine and Trademark Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Indonesia and the United States
1M. Iqbal Simatupang, 2 Rahayu
1,2Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i7-04

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The research explained comparatively the application of the first to file doctrine and the trademark dispute settlement mechanism in Indonesia and in the United States. The purpose of this research was to provide a broad explanation of the application of the first to file doctrine and provide an overview of the mechanism for settling the problem of infringement of trademark rights. This study used a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach (Statute Approach) accompanied by a Comparative Approach, the data used was secondary data. Based on the research results, it was known that the Trademark Law still recognizes and / or implements the first to file and first to use doctrine. In Indonesian law, which basically adheres to the first to file doctrine, it still provides room for the first user to claim ownership of a trademark. Meanwhile, The Lanham Act accommodates the doctrine of first to use and first to file simultaneously but is limited by the trademark rights protection space. The mechanisms for settling trademark rights infringement disputes in Indonesia and in the United States have similarities and differences. The similarity is in both country, trademark dispute settllement is done through the litigation and non-litigation mechanism. The difference is that in Indonesia the most common mechanism is litigation, while in the United States the non-litigation mechanism is preferred in settling disputes over trademark rights.

KEYWORDS:

Comparison; First to File; Trademark

REFERENCES

1) Andre Asmara,Sri Walny Rahayu, Sanusi Bintang, ‘Studi Kasus Penerapan Doktrin Pendaftaran First TO File Pada Pembatalan Merek Cap Mawar (Putusan MARI Nomor: 512 K/ PDT. SUS-HKI/2016)’, Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 2.2 (2019), DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i2.11899

2) Ashari, Luthfan Ibnu, Budi Santoso, Paramitha Prananingtyas, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Merek Terhadap Nama Domain Yang Sama Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 5.3 (2016),

3) Aurellia, Sbarina & Chirstine S.T Kansil, “Analisis Penerapan Perjanjian Internasional Merek Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3, 2 (2020). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10605

4) Dendy Widya Chandra, Budi Santoso, Novira Maharani Sukma, ‘Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Asing Yang Belum Terdaftar Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Sengketa Merek KEEN)’, Notarius, 13.1 (2012), DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.30391

5) Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, Laporan Tahunan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Tahun 2019, 2019

6) Erma, Wahyuni, Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Hukum Merek (Yogyakarta: YPAPI, 2011)

7) Fajar, Mukti, Yati Nurhayati, Ifrani Ifrani, ‘Iktikad Tidak Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25.2 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art1

8) Firman Freaddy Busroh, ‘Konseptualisasi Omnibus Law Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Regulasi Pertanahan’, Arena Hukum, 10.2 (2017). DOI https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01002.4

9) Ghuffran, Mohammad, “Prinsip First To File Dalam Pendaftaran Hak Merek di Indonesia (Studi Putusan PK Nomor: 179PK/PDT.SUS/2012)”, (Tesis, Universitas Sumatera Utara, (2017).

10) Henry Donald Lbn. Toruan, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Acara Cepat Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes by Fast Proceeding’, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 17.1 (2017), 74–91, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.74-91

11) Insan Budi Maulana, Naskah Akademik Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Merek (Jakarta, 2008)

12) Iqbal Satrio Putra, Budi Santoso, Kornelius Benuf, "Online Dispute Resolution Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Financial Technology Di Indonesia", Simbur Cahaya, 27.2 (2021), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/sc.v27i2.1035

13) Kornelius Benuf, Ery Agus Priyono, Siti Mahmudah, Siti Malikhatun Badriyah, Bagus Rahmanda, Amiek Soemarmi, ‘Efektifitas Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Bisnis Financial Technology (Peer to Peer Lending) Di Indonesia’, Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal), 15.2 (2020), DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i2.21777

14) Murjiyanto, R., ‘Konsep Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek Di Indonesia (Studi Pergeseran Sistem “Deklaratif’’ Ke Dalam Sistem "Konstitutif’)”’ (Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2016)

15) ------“Konsep Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek di Indonesia (Studi Pergeseran Sistem Deklaratif ke Dalam Sistem Konstitutif” (Disertasi, Universitas Islam Indonesia, DI Yogyakarta (2016)

16) Nathania, Michelle, “Analisis Konsepsi Asas First to File Dalam Pembatalan Merek Terdaftar (Contoh Kasus: Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung No. 999 K/PDDT.SUS-HKI/2019 dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No. 15/PDT.SUSMEREK/2015/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST”), Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3.2, (2020), Hlm.1426. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10621

17) Ratna, Permata Rika, Tasya Safiranita, Biondy Utama “Pentingnya Merek Bagi Pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menegah di Jawa Barat”, Dialogia Iuridica, 10. 2, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v10i2.1133

18) Priyo Amboro Steven, Yudhi, “Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak Merek Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat”, Journal of Judicial Review, XVII, 2, (2015), hlm.54.

19) Republik Indonesia. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 24 Tahun 1979 tentang Pengesahan “Paris Convention For The Protection Of Industrial property”

20) Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 1961 Tentang Merek Perusahaan dan Merek Perniagaan

21) Republik Indonesia, Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis

22) Santoso, Edy, ‘Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Merek Dagang Melalui Peran Kepabeanan Sebagai Upaya Menjaga Keamanan Dan Kedaulatan Negara’, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 6.1 (2016), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i1.8

23) Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014)

24) Sitepu, Vania Isura, ‘Pelaksanaan Prinsip First to File Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Asing Di Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Tentang Gugatan Pencabutan Hak Merek “Toast Box” Oleh BreadTalk Pte.Ltd No: 02/Merek/2011/PN.Niaga/Medan)”.’, Premise Law Journal, 3.1 (2015), 1–12

25) Stockholm, Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization (1967)

26) Sujatmiko, Agung, ‘Perjanjian Lisensi Merek Terkenal’, Mimbar Hukum, 22.2 (2010), https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16228

27) Wijaya, Evelyn Larissa Florentia, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Atas Kesamaan Bunyi Merek Terhadap Barang Yang Tidak Sejenis’, Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 5.2 (2020), DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.187

28) Yessiningrum, Winda Risna, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Indikasi Geografis Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual’, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3.7 (2015), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12345/ius.v3i7.198

29) Yulia Widiastuti Hayuningru, Kholis Roisah, ‘Perlindungan Hak Ekonomi Terhadap Penggunaan Merek Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba’, Jurnal Law Reform, 11.2 (2015), DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i2.15773

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar