¹Oussama HAMAL,²Housseine BACHIRI,³Nour-eddine El FADDOULI, ⁴Samir BENNANI

¹,³,⁴RIME Team - LRIE Laboratory (EMI), Mohammed V University, Rabat-Morocco

² Faculty of Sciences and Technologies (FSTT), Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier-Morocco

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i8-12

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This paper principally seeks to examine the genesis and development of MOOCs. Recent research and ICT development efforts have strived to engineer technologies that aim at effectively facilitating and improving the quality of learning anywhere and anytie independently in a stress-free environment. It must be noted that research in open learning environments is still making baby steps and researchers have solely made preliminary initiatives to fathom out the nature and incessant chaniging dynamics of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as a topic of investigation. This interest is fuled by the fact that learning has nearly completely become digital worldwide as it were, and thereforeperpetual research efforts to understand the underlying principles of MOOCs is a genuine necessity. More importantly, it has been proven in research that when computer science and education are mixed together, they seem to yield impeccable learning results. Given this, we will both chart a roadmap for the creation of a MOOC and incrementally work towards its implementation.

KEYWORDS:

E-Learning, MOOCs, Connectivism, Distance education, Autonomy, Taxonomy

REFERENCES

1) Alain, L. (1999). Technologies et facilitation de l’apprentissage. http://archives.refad.ca/recherche/Technologies/chapitre_3.html

2) Anthony, K., & Henri, F. (1985). Le savoir à domicile ; pédagogie et problématique dès la formation à distance—Presses de l’Université du Québec—Ebook (pdf)—Le Hall du Livre NANCY. https://halldulivre.com/ebook/9782760521483-le-savoir-a-domicile-pedagogie-et-problematique-des-la-formation-a distance-anthony-kaye-france-henri/

3) Atiaja, L., & Guerrero-Proenza, R. S. (2016). The MOOCs : Origin, characterization, principal problems and challenges in Higher Education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1093

4) Blandin, B. (2003). Regards croisés sur la formation ouverte et à distance. Distances et savoirs, Vol. 1(3), 413-417.

5) Cisel, M. (2016). Utilisations des MOOC : Éléments de typologie [Phdthesis, Université Paris-Saclay]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01444125

6) Cisel, M. (2018). Une analyse automatisée des modalités d’évaluation dans les MOOC. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du e-Learning et La Formation à Distance, 33(1), Article 1. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1052

7) Clark, D. (2013, avril 16). MOOCs: Taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Donald Clark Plan B. http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com/2013/04/moocs-taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html

8) Glikman, V. (2002a). Chapitre I. Éléments pour une définition des formations ouvertes et à distance. Education et formation / Technologies de l’education et de la formation, 9-20.

9) Glikman, V. (2002b). Des cours par correspondance au « e-learning » : Panorama des formations ouvertes et à distance. In Distances et savoirs.

10) Jacquinot, G. (1993). Apprivoiser la distance et supprimerl’absence ? Ou les défis de la formation à distance. Revue française de pédagogie, 102(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1993.1305

11) Karsenti, T. (2014). MOOC : Révolution ou simple effet de mode? Revue Internationale Des Technologies En Pédagogie Universitaire.

12) Keegan, D. (2013). Foundations of Distance Education. Routledge.La formation à distance, un système complexe et compliqué. (s.d.). Consulté 26 mai 2020, à l’adresse https://www.epi.asso.fr/revue/articles/a0609b.htm#Note18

13) Lin, J., & Cantoni, L. (2017). Assessing the Performance of a Tourism MOOC Using the Kirkpatrick Model : A Supplier’s Point of View. 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51168-9_10

14) Marilyne, R., Caron, P.-A., & Heutte, J. (2014). A typology and dimensions of a description framework for MOOCs. 130-139.

15) Pilli, O., & Admiraal, W. (2016). A Taxonomy of Massive Open Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 223-240.

16) Riyami, B. (2018). Analyse des effets des TIC sur l’enseignement supérieur au Maroc dans un contexte de formation en collaboration avec une université française. [Phdthesis, Université de Bretagne Sud]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel 02004288.

17) Sanchez-Gordon, S. (2016). How Could MOOCs Become Accessible? The Case of edX and the Future of Inclusive Online Learning

18) Trestini, M., Coulibaly, B., Rossini, I., & Pébayle, E. C. (2016). Appropriation sociale des MOOC en France. ISTE Group.

19) Yuan, L., & Powell, S. J. (2015). Partnership Model for Entrepreneurial Innovation in Open Online Learning. E-Learning Papers, 41. https://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 08 August 2021