¹Damian Adhi Susastyo,²Bambang Waluyo

¹,²Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Jl. Rs. Fatmawati, Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan, 12450

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i9-18

Google Scholar Download Pdf
Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has broad duties and authorities in the prevention and prosecution of corruption with the functions of investigation, investigation and prosecution. In Law Number 30 of 2002 Article 6 states that the Corruption Eradication Commission has the following duties: a. Coordination with agencies authorized to do eradicate criminal acts of corruption; b. Supervision of agencies authorized to do eradicate criminal acts of corruption; c. Carry out investigations, investigations and prosecutions of criminal acts of corruption; d. Taking steps to prevent criminal acts of corruption; and e. Monitor to the implementation of government. However, over time since its to establish, regulatory reviews of the KPK have continued to be carried out, given the increasing number of judicial reviews in the Constitutional Court regarding the position and authority of the KPK. Apart from the pros and cons, as part of the most important agenda in reforming governance in Indonesia, the presence of the KPK was motivated by the low level of public trust in law enforcement agencies (the Attorney General's Office and the Police) at that time in eradicating corruption. On the other hand, especially during the 17 years of Law Number 30 of 2002, there have been many changes in conditions, so the revision of the KPK Law is deemed necessary to determine whether efforts to eradicate corruption are in accordance with the objectives of establishing the KPK. Whether the reason for evaluating and revising the authority of the KPK is seen as a form of strengthening or weakening the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), is the basis for this research being carried out.

Keywords

KPK, Corruption Crime, Institutional Strengthening

REFERENCES

Books
1) Burhan Ashafa, 1988, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

2) Soekanto Soerjono, Sri Mamudji, 2013, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

3) Sugeng Istanto, 2007, Penelitian Hukum, Yogjakarta: CV.Ganda.
Regulation
1) Indonesia, Undang-undang 2002, Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

2) Indonesia, Undang-undang 2019, Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Website
1) https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/02/13/09415241/survei-alvara-kepuasan-terhadap-kinerja-kpk-turun-tajam-di-100- hari-jokowi, accessed on April, 22, 2021

2) https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200224073216-12-477361/indo-barometer-kepercayaan-publik-ke-kpk-turun-tniteratas, accessed on April, 22, 2021.

3) https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5104280/tni-jadi-lembaga-tepercaya-versi-survei-charta-polri-kpk-alami-penurunan, accessed on April, 26, 2021.

4) https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1241754/lsi-kpk-lembaga-paling-dipercaya-disusulpresiden-dan-polisi/full&view=ok “LSI:KPK Lembaga Paling Dipercaya, disusul Presiden dan Polisi”, accessed on April, 22, 2021.

5) www.legalakses.com/surat-penghentian-penyidikan-perkara-sp3/ (accessed on April, 22, 2021)

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2021