¹Maria Louis Cahya Lumaris, ²Darminto Hartono Paulus

¹Faculty of Law, Uniersitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

²International Law Department, Faculty of Law

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i9-04

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aimed to analyze the legal efforts of conflict resolution in the Cash on Delivery system in e-commerce transactions in Indonesia. As will be discussed in this research is the development of e-commerce in Indonesia, payment systems in e-commerce in Indonesia, and legal efforts of conflict resolution in the Cash on Delivery systems in e-commerce transactions in Indonesia. This study used normative juridical research methods and research data used were secondary legal data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the study, it is known that e-commerce in Indonesia is developed rapidly, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Besides the development of e-commerce followed by the development of electronic payment systems in Indonesia, one of them is the Cash on Delivery (COD) system. However, this system creates a conflict between the parties involved in the electronic transaction. Legally, there are two ways of resolving conflict can be put forward, including non-litigation, which is done to achieve peace between the parties involved in the conflict, and if peace is not reached, legal remedies can be taken in litigation by the Buyer by taking civil law action because the Seller has defaulted as regulated in Article 1243 of the Civil Code. In addition, the Buyer can also take criminal litigation efforts by arguing that the Seller has committed a criminal act of fraud as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 28 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law. However, criminal litigation is carried out as a last resort in law enforcement or as an ultimum remedium.

KEYWORDS:

Electronic Transactions; E-Commerce e; Cash on Delivery; Conflict

REFERENCES

1) Administrator, ‘Bisnis E-Commerce Semakin Gurih (Terjadi Peningkatan Transaksi Berbasis Digital Seiring Banyaknya Waktu Orang Di Rumah Sepanjang Masa Pandemi)’, Indonesia.Go.Id, 2021

2) Andrei Hagiu, Julian Wright, ‘Marketplace or Reseller?’, Management Science, 16.1 (2015), 184–203

3) Antonius Dwicky Cahyadi, ‘Yurisdiksi Transaksi Elektronik Internasional Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik’, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3.1 (2019), 23–40

4) Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar, ‘Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer’, Gema Keadilan, 7.1 (2020), 20–33

5) Christy, Firdhy Esterina, ‘Top 10 E-Commerce Di Indonesia Kuartal I 2020’, Tempo.Co, 2020

6) Conney Stephanie, ‘Rentetan Kasus COD, Mengancam Kurir Hingga Paket Tak Bertuan’, Kompas.Com (Jakarta, 2021)

7) Deky Pariadi, ‘Pengawasan E-Commerce Dalam Undang-Undang Perdagangan Dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 48.3 (2018), 651–69

8) Dhira Utari Umar, ‘Penerapan Asas Konsensualisme Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Menurut Perspektif Hukum Perdata’, Lex Privatum, 8.1 (2020), 38–48

9) Dita Hapsari, Hendro Saptono dan Herni Widanarti, ‘Kedudukan E-Commerce Dalam Prespektif Undang- Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 201 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 8.1 (2019), 211–23

10) Harsono, Alexander, ‘Understanding E-Business & E-Commerce And Their Relation To The Conceptual Framework Of Emarketing: Case Study’, Jurnal Informatika Dan Komputer, 2.1 (2011), 50–64

11) Hestin Mulyasari, Thanh Thi Bi Dan, A Bima Murti Wijaya, ‘Analisis Jenis Sistem Pembayaran Elektronik Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Di Indonesia’, in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (Yogyakarta, 2014)

12) Kadek Wulandari Laksmi P, Gusti Putu Lestara Permana, ‘Penggunaan E-Money Dalam E-Commerce Sebagai Pendukung Cash Less Society’, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 8.2 (2018), 18–23

13) Kurniawan, Rasyid Rea, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian Jual Beli Secara Online Di Olx.Com Dengan Sistem Cash On Delivery (COD)’ (Universitas Muhamadiah Surakarta, 2016)

14) Lestari, Eelyn Angelita Pinondang Manurung dan Eka Ayu Purnama, ‘Kajian Perlindungan E-Payment Berbasis Qr-Code Dalam E-Commerce’, Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Sains Dan Humaniora, 4.1 (2020), 28–36

15) Lita Sari Marita, ‘Metode Pembayaran Belanja Dengan E-Commerce’, Cakrawala: Jurnal Humaniona, 12.2 (2012), 105– 13

16) Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004)

17) Muhammad Junaidi, Kadi Sukarno, Bambang Sadono, ‘Pemahaman Tindak Pidana Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Undang Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik’, Jurnal Budimas, 2.2 (2020), 109–18

18) Mukti Fajar, Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017)

19) Picaully, Maria Regina, ‘Pengaruh Kepercayaan Pelanggan Terhadap Niat Pembelian Gadget Di Shopee Indonesia’, Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 18.1 (2018), 31–40

20) Rochani Urip, Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, ‘Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Transaksi Elektronik (E-Commerce)’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13.1 (2013), 123–38

21) Roy Eka Perkasa, Nyoman Serikat P, Bambang Eko Turisno, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual/Beli Online E-Commerce Di Indonesia’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 5.4 (2016), 1–13

22) RR Dewi Anggraeni, Acep Heri Rizal, ‘Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Internet (E-Commerce) Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdataan’, : : Salam Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 6.3 (2019), 45–58

23) ———, ‘Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Internet (E-Commerce) Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdataan’, Salam Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 3.1 (2019), 223–38

24) Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy, ‘E-Commerce (Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Hukum)’, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 6.6 (2018), 23–43

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2021