¹Rianda Dirkareshza, ²Ratna Sumirat , ³Risa Gia Anjani

¹,²,³Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i9-43

Google Scholar Download Pdf
Abstract

There are several facilities provided by financing institutions, until now leasing has become the most frequently used facility by the community. Leasing is a type of fiduciary guarantee, where in the agreement Customer Financing must pay an installment fee against the fiduciary guarantee object until the object can be said to be paid off. In practice, it is often found that Customer Financing defaults with discontinued installments and does not provide voluntary collateral objects to financing institutions. Thus, the dispute of default must be resolved immediately so that it does not take a long time, this financing institution is assisted by a third party, namely debt collectors. However, the passing of Supreme Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 the procedure of execution of the object of bail must now be taken by court process. In addition to the court process is considered relatively long, the value of the object of guarantee also continues to decrease over time, then in this case the financing institution becomes the aggrieved party. Therefore, research is needed so that there is no inequality of rights. This research is conducted with a juridical-normative approach and doctrinal law, with data collection techniques in document studies and leasing staff interviews, and analyzed qualitatively. To increase effectiveness in the implementation of execution rights and avoid losses that are always borne by financing institutions, it requires firm enforcement and optimization of default dispute resolution carried out by Customer Financing.

KEYWORDS

Leasing, Fiduciary, Default

REFERENCES

1) ACC. (2020). ACC One. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from acc.co.id website: https://www.acc.co.id/accone/TentangACC_Detail?Detail=U2FsdGVkX1%2B0ZfGD%2FwMpQI6z1b0TOWG%2FxJxdfyjLhr X2MDbjOD0pcnsEfZSqgpy9yhGZXGac%2BYHfIA4UMTFZ%2BDRqo4%2BQUjFUWKwnHbJJwyxILTelDO9fExtwtY4Zi 8Iy

2) Aprilianti, A. (2015). Perjanjian Sewa Guna Usaha Antara Customer Financing Dan Lessor. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(3), 315–323.

3) Aswati, W. O., Mas’ud, A., & Nudi, T. N. (2018). Pengaruh Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Pengetahuan Pajak, Dan Akuntabilitas Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Kasus Kantor UPTB SAMSAT Kabupaten Muna). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 3(1), 27–39.

4) Badriyah, S. M. (2011). Pemuliaan (Breeding) Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Dengan Objek Barang Modal Yang Berkembang Di Masyarakat (Studi Tentang Perjanjian Leasing Di Indonesia). Tesis.. Universitas Diponegoro.

5) Bhudiman, B. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Dalam Perjanjian Leasing Pada Pt. Era Cepat Transportindo. Jurnal Yustisi, 3(2), 1–12.

6) Breslauer, P. (1992). Finance Lease Hell or High Water Clause and Third Party Beneficiary Theory in Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code. Cornell Law Review, 77(2), 318–349.

7) Cooluris, J. G. . (1982). Consumer Leasing. American Bar Association, 37(3), 1134–1137.

8) Dewi, R. P., Saptanti, N., & Purwadi, H. (2017). Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Repertorium Volume, 4(1), 73–81.

9) Eisfeldt, A. L., Rampini, A. A., Eisfeldt, A. L., & Rampini, A. A. (2009). The Society for Financial Studies Leasing , Ability to Repossess , and Debt Capacity Published by-: Oxford University Press. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1621–1657.

10) Erco Law. (2020). ”Leasing” Masih Bisa Tarik Aset, Anotasi Putusan MK Tentang Fidusia No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019”. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from ercolaw.com website: https://ercolaw.com/leasing-masih-bisa-tarik-aset-anotasi-putusan-mk-tentang-fidusia-no-18-puu-xvii-2019/ 11) Faber, D., & Schuijling, B. (2007). Financial Leasing and Its Unification by Unidroit D. Faber & B. Schuijling. (August 2003), 1– 19.

12) Febriyanti, W. D. R. (2020). Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2), 39–52.

13) Gross, E. K., Liberatore, D. A., & Whelan, S. T. (2015). Lease. The Business Lawyer, 70(4), 1183–1196.

14) Hrf/sfr. (2020). Kemendag Catat 1.354 Sengketa Konsumen Terkait Pembiayaan. Retrieved February 11, 2021, from cnnindonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20201027145600-92-563305/kemendag-catat-1354-sengketa-konsumen-terkait-pembiayaan

15) Jafar. (2004). Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Lessor Dalam Perjanjian Leasing (Sewa Guna Usaha) (Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro). Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

16) Juhariyono, A. (2021). Polisi Selidiki Kasus Pengeroyokan Debt Collector di Tasikmalaya. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from iNews.id website: https://jabar.inews.id/berita/polisi-selidiki-kasus-pengeroyokan-debt-collector-di-tasikmalaya

17) Kaimuddin, A. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Pada Proses Diversi Tingkat Penyidikan. Arena Hukum, 8(2), 258–279.

18) Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Keputusan Menteri Keuangan No. 1169/KMK.01/1991 Tentang Kegiatan Sewa Guna Usaha. , (1991). Jakarta.

19) Kusumasari, D. (2011). Permasalahan Cessie dan Subrogasi. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from hukumonline.com website: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/cl3400/permasalahan-cessie-dan-subrogasi

20) Kusumawati, I. N., & Rachman, A. N. (2021). ANALISA PENGARUH WAJIB PAJAK DALAM MEMBAYAR PAJAK. Jurnal Ekonomi-QU, 11(1), 1–20.

21) Lesmana, A. S., & Hutasuhut, Y. A. A. (2021). Dikejar-kejar Warga, Debt Collector Nekat Terjun ke Kali Ciliwung. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from Suara.com website: https://www.suara.com/news/2021/04/20/134502/ambil-paksa-motor-cewek-awal-debt-collector-dikejar-hingga-nyebur-ke-kali?page=all

22) Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jakarta.

23) Makki, S. (2020). Leasing Bisa Tarik Kendaraan Kredit Macet Tanpa Pengadilan. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from CNN Indonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20200114172622-384-465299/leasing-bisa-tarik-kendaraan-kredit-macet-tanpa-pengadilan

24) Mohamedien, G. W. . (2002). Legal Aspects of Leasing : A Critical Review of Egyptian Law No . 95 of 1995 on Finance Lease. Arab Law Quarterly, 17(95), 108–149.

25) Olga. (2019). Ingin Menjual Mobil Bekas? Pastikan Paham Cara Menentukan Harga! Retrieved June 10, 2021, from Caroline.id website: https://www.caroline.id/berita/cara-menentukan-harga-jual-mobil-bekas/

26) Peter, S. W. (2010). Financial Leasing of Equipment in the Law of the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 58, 323–351.

27) Ramadhan, A. S. (2021). Detik-detik Warga Ngamuk Lempar Motor Milik Debt Collector ke Sungai. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from SuaraJabar.id website: https://jabar.suara.com/read/2021/04/08/151500/detik-detik-warga-ngamuk-lempar-motor-milik-debt-collector-ke-sungai

28) Republik Indonesia. Undang – Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia, LN Nomor 168, TLN Nomor 3889. , (1999). Jakarta.

29) Rojc, K., & Stendahl, K. E. (2004). Vicarious Liability of Motor Vehicle Lessors. American Bar Association, 59(3), 1161–1177.

30) Shidiq, A. Z., Afandi, & Kaimuddin, A. (2021). SISTEM E-COURT SEBAGAI WUJUD IMPLEMENTASI ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 27(3), 331–349.

31) Silondae, A. A., & Fariana, A. (2010). Aspek Hukum dalam Ekonomi & Bisnis. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

32) Soemitro. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

33) Sunaryo. (2008). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan (I). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

34) Suryani, L. P., Hukum, F., Warmadewa, U., & Kendaraan, P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengusaha Sewa Menyewa Kendaraan Bermotor Yang Dirugikan Oleh Konsumen Pada Perusahaan Paulus Rental Bike Kabupaten Badung. 1(1), 234–238.

35) Tim Peneliti. (2021). Wawancara dengan Bapak R. Bagus Dwiantho selaku Corporate Secretary & Coporate Counsel Division Head PT Astra Sedaya Finance, 20 Mei 2021. Jakarta.

36) Triwanto. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen LeasingTerhadap Pencantuman Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Research Fair Unsri 3, 3(1), 355–364.

37) Waode, D. D. S. (2018). Upaya Hukum Dan Penyelesaian Akibat Default Serta Overmacht Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan. Dedikasi Jurnal Mahasiswa, 1(1), 746–749.

38) Yulianti, C. E. (2019). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PERUSAHAAN LEASINGTERHADAP TERJADINYA PENGGELAPAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Dinamika, 25(1), 1–15.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2021