Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
Marcel Loyd MINKA
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Department of Animal, Nutrition and Food Sciences (DiANA)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-62Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Land conflict is a serious and sensitive issue in Africa. Disputes about land occur at all levels, which are: Conflicts between neighbors about field boundaries; between pastoralists and farmers; between states and indigenous peoples; etc (Wardell & Lund, 2006). These conflicts are a serious threat to agricultural and land productivity. Now our days there exist several methods of land data collection which facilitates land conflict mitigation, and each of these methods are been explained in various papers. However, none of these papers have compared these methods to bring out their unique contribution as a means to assist practitioners in identifying land conflicts prone areas. Our research is centered around the question: what is the distinctive contribution of each land data collection methods in identifying land conflict prone areas during participatory mapping? Using a case study of three villages in Mbalmayo (Cameroon), our research adopts an approach that combines farmland data from interviews, questionnaires, consultative meetings, field visits, demarcation of farm boundaries; recording of Ground Corner Points using Catalyst DA2, UAV flights, and participatory mapping. In this paper, we discuss the usefulness and limitation of each method, highlighting their unique contribution to the holistic understanding of the context of Mbalmayo and the mitigation of land conflicts. The study was conducted from June to October 2023. The results of our analysis shows that amongst the eight methods used to collect farmland data, six of these methods had a distinctive contribution that facilitated the mitigation process by precisely identifying the land boundary conflicts zones. The ideas provided by this paper can serve as guidelines for researchers and practitioners interested in mitigating land conflicts through participatory mapping approaches.
KEYWORDS:Participatory mapping; Land conflicts; Mitigation; Data collection methods.
REFERENCES1) Claudia, L., Auriol, D., Gergely, V., Kaspar, K., & Angela, S. (2023). The SmartLandMaps Approach for Participatory Land Rights Mapping. Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), 1-21.
2) EPA, U. S. (2024). What are the trends in land use and their effects on human health and the environment? Washington, DC: epa.gov.
3) Evans, J. D. (2018). A Reciprocal Triangulation Process For Identifying And Mapping Potential Land Use Conflict. Environmental Managment Journal, Volume 62, pp. 777–791.
4) FAO. (2012). Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
5) Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, pp. 337-355.
6) Israel, O. T., Sunday, O. O., & Matthew, O. I. (2023). Comparative Analysis of GNSS-derived Ground Control oints on UAV Orthomosaic Accuracies; A Case Study of The Federal Polytechnic Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Akure: Remote Sensing and Geoscience information System Department, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria.
7) Joan-Cristian, P., Francisco-Javier, M., Jordi, P., & Xavier, P. (2019). Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, volume 75, March 2019, 130-140.
8) Liliane, M. D., Romain, N. J., Caroline, M. S., Abigaelle, T., & Loic, T. T. (2022). Quantifying Forest Loss in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve (Center Region, Cameroon). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, Vol.10, pp. 271-288.
9) Lund, C., Odgaard, R., & Sjaastad, E. (2006). Land Rights and Land Conflicts in Africa: A review of issues and experiences. Denmark: Danish Institute for International Studies.
10) Ringo, J. (2023). Roles of village land councils in mitigation of land conflicts in Ngorongoro district, Tanzania. Heliyon - Cell Press, Volume 9, Issue 4, E15132, APRIL 2023, 8 pp.
11) Smith, D. A., Ibanez, A., & Herrera, F. (2017). The Importance of Context: Assessing the Benefits and Limitations of Participatory Mapping for Empowering Indigenous Communities in the Comarca Ngäbe-Buglé, Panama. The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, Volume 52 Issue 1, Spring 2017, pp. 49-62.
12) Socpa, A. (2011). New Kinds of Land Conflict in Urban Cameroon: the Case of the ‘landless’ Indigenous Peoples in Yaoundé. Cambridge University Press, Africa , Volume 80 , Issue 4, pp. 553-572.
13) THAMBIKENI, M. (2015). Analysis of ICT application in mitigating land conflicts: case study oftanzania. nternational Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 13, No. 11, 6 pp.
14) Trimble, C. G. (2021). GIS/GNSS Data Collection with Trimble DA2 and Subscription-Based Catalyst. Colorado: Trimble Geospatial.
15) Wardell, D. A., & Lund, C. (2006). Governing Access to Forests in Northern Ghana: Micro-Politics and the Rents of Non-Enforcement. ELSEVIER World Ddevelopment Journal, Volume 34, Issue 11, pp. 1887-1906.
