¹Muhamad Nur Ajie Arie Achnuphi, ²Slamet Tri Wahyudi, ³Supardi

^1,2,3Master of Law, Faculty of Law, University Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-72

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

This study aims to determine the legal consequences of decisions on narcotics criminal cases that deviate from the provisions of the general minimum special criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges and the ideal concept of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting in 2015 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court in narcotics criminal cases class I. The type of research in this study is normative juridical supported by interviews with informants. The results of the study in this discussion are that the legal consequences of a narcotics criminal case decision deviating from the provisions of the special minimum general criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges are decisions that are contrary to the principle of legality and cause disparities in judges' decisions for other cases that are identical to legal facts and conflicts of interest between the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges in the trial.

KEYWORDS:

criminalization, perpetrators, narcotics, legal consequences, principle of legality.

REFERENCES
1) Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi. (2024). “The Evolution of Scientific Evidence Theory in Criminal Law: A Transformative Insight”, Jurnal Media Iuris, Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024).

2) Biloro, Sofia. (2018). “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Ahli dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP”, Jurnal Lex Crimen, Vol. 7, No. 1, hlm. 96-103.

3) Harefa, Beniharmoni. (2017). “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Penyalahguna Narkotika Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Perspektif. Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017). hlm. 222-230.

4) Indonesia, Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahakamah Agung Tahun 2015 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas bagi Pengadilan, SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2015, Rumusan Hukum Kamar Pidana tentang Narkotika, hlm. 1.

5) Marpaung, Leden. (2011). Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

6) Mulyadi, Lilik. (1996). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Tinjauan Khusus Terhadap Surat Dakwaan, Eksepsi, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

7) Prakoso, Djoko and I Ketut Murtika. (1987). Mengenal Lembaga Kejaksaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

8) Pudjosewojo, Kusumadi. (1976). Pedoman Pelajaran Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

9) Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6929K/Pid.Sus/2022 tanggal 8 Desember 2022, hlm. 6.

10) Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Depok Nomor 184/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Dpk, tanggal 3 Juni 2022, hlm. 21.

11) Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 240/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Bdg tanggal 10 Agustus 2022, hlm. 10.

12) Rangga, Galih Setyo. (2019). “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Pemidanaan Yang Tidak Berdasarkan Surat Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum”. Jurnal Hukum Universitas Wisnuwardhana, hlm. 33-42.

13) Rusyadi, Lutfhi.(2016). “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana”.Jurnal Hukum Prioris,Vol.5,No.2, hlm. 132.

14) Soekanto, Soerjono and Sri Mamudji. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

15) Waluyo, Bambang. (2023). Sistem pemasyarakatan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024