Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
1Nur Isna Humairah, 2Helmi, 3Kaharuddin Arafah, 4Khaeruddin, 5Muhammad Arsyad
1,2,3,4,5 Physics Education, Postgraduate Program, Makassar State University, Makassar, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-76Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
The research on the development of Science Technology Society (STS)-based physics student worksheet has been conducted. This study aims to: (i) produce valid STS-based physics student worksheets, (ii) analyze the practicality of STS-based physics student worksheets, and (iii) analyze the effectiveness of STS-based physics student worksheets on students’ science literacy at SMAN 4 Gowa. The research method is Research and Development (R&D) with 4D model. The subjects of this research trial were 35 students of class XI IPA 1 at SMAN 4 Gowa. The instruments used include validation sheets, practitioner assessment questionnaires, and science literacy test instruments. Validity criteria based on expert validation results analyzed with Aiken's Index. Practicality criteria based on practitioners’ assessment result. Effectiveness criteria based on students' science literacy test result analyzed with N-gain equation. The results showed: (i) The validity of STS-based physics student worksheets meets the valid criteria with an expert agreement index (V) of 0.80, (ii) The practicality of STS-based physics student worksheets meets the practical criteria with a percentage of practitioner assessment of 91.88% in the very practical category, (iii) The effectiveness of STS-based physics student worksheets on science literacy of SMAN 4 Gowa students meets the effective criteria with an N-gain score of 0.42 in the medium category. Based on this research, it can be concluded that STS-based physics student worksheets are valid, practical, and effective in terms of improving students' science literacy.
KEYWORDS:physics student worksheet, Science Technology Society (STS), science literacy
REFERENCES1) Afdalia, Arsyad, M., & Arafah, K. 2020. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran IPA Fisika Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Sandeq pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika PPs UNM, 2, 68–71.
2) Akker, J. van den, Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. 1999. Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3) Arikunto, S. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
4) Arsyad, M., Helmi, & Mallago, J. D. 2020. Pengembangan Materi Ajar Berbasis Eksperimen pada Matakuliah Fisika Umum Mahasiswa Megister Prodi Pendidikan Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika PPs UNM, 3, 5–8.
5) Azwar, S. 2012. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
6) Budiastuti, D., & Bandur, A. 2018. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian: Dilengkapi Analisis dengan NVIVO, SPSS, dan AMOS. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
7) Devi, M. G., & Aznam, N. 2019. The effect of Science-Technology-Society (STS) model on scientific literacy and scientific attitude of students on the subject of buffer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6.
8) Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. 2015. Scientific literacy in school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 209, 167–172.
9) Finsi, C. Y., Anaperta, M., & Helendra. 2021. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Learning pada Kelas XI IPA SMA I Negeri Ulakan Tapakis. Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA Dan Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 89–95.
10) Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
11) Hunaepi, Samsuri, T., Asy’ari, M., & Sukaisih, R. 2014. Sains Teknologi Masyarakat: Strategi, Pendekatan, dan Model Pembelajaran. Mataram: Duta Pustaka Ilmu.
12) Husamah, Pantiwati, Y., Restian, & Sumarsono, P. 2018. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Malang: UMM Press.
13) Kassiavera, S., Sunarno, W., & Suparmi, A. 2019. Pengembangan Modul Fisika Berbasis Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 323–333.
14) Majid, A. 2012. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
15) OECD. 2023. PISA 2022 results (volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
16) Pratama, A. O. S., Abdurrahman, & Jalmo, T. 2018. The effect of science-technology-society approach-based worksheets on improving Indonesian students’ scientific literacy. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2), 1–12.
17) Rahayu, C., Eliyarti, & Festiyed. 2019. Kepraktisan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Generative Learning dengan Pendekatan Open-ended Problem. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3), 164–176.
18) Rasto, & Pradana, R. 2021. Problem Based Learning vs Sains Teknologi dalam Meningkatkan Intelektual Siswa. Indramayu: Penerbit Adab.
19) Ryandhosi, A. 2023. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Pidik Fisika Berbasis Model Research Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Creative Thinking Skills di MAN Sebukar Kerinci. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(3), 97–108.
20) Sundayana. 2014. Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
21) Trianto. 2011. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.
22) Widodo, S., Ladyani, F., Asrianto, L. O., Rusdi, Khairunnisa, Lestari, S. M. P., Wijayanti, D. R., Devriany, A., Hidayat, A., Dalfian, Nurcahyati, S., Sjahriani, T., Armi, Widya, N., & Rogayah. 2023. Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian. Pangkalpinang: CV Science Techno Direct.
23) World Economic Forum. 2015. New vision for education: Unlocking the potential of technology. Geneva: World Economic Forum Publishing.
24) Zahara, H. S., & Atun, S. 2018. Effect of science-technology-society approach on senior high school students’ scientific literacy and social skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 30–38.
