¹Cris Saranza, ²Eric Villamar, ³Erwin Arlan, ⁴Janine Francia, ⁵Lorna Lopio-Alas, ⁶Ralph Buca

^1,2St. Paul University – Surigao, Philippines
³Caraga State University, Philippines
⁴Surigao del Norte State University – Claver, Philippines
⁵Northestern Mindanao State University – Tandag, Philippines
⁶Mindanao State University – Marawi, Philippines

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-77

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

This study examined the relationship between ChatGPT's usage frequency and perceived value among 386 international university students from selected universities in the Caraga and Northern Mindanao regions of the Philippines, specifically to the moderating role of disposable income. Utilizing a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design, the results showed a significant positive correlation between usage frequency and perceived value, supporting the hypothesis that more frequent use leads to greater perceived value. However, this relationship was found to be moderated by disposable income, with the correlation between usage frequency and perceived value being stronger among students with lower disposable incomes. These findings imply that while increased usage generally enhances perceived value, the effect weakens for higher-income students, possibly due to their access to alternative resources. The study underscores the need to consider disposable income when integrating AI tools into education to promote equitable access and maximize benefits for diverse student populations. Future research should investigate these dynamics longitudinally and across various academic disciplines.

KEYWORDS:

ChatGPT, Perceived Value, Usage Frequency, Disposable Income, AI Tools in Education

REFERENCES
1) Aithal, P. (2024). Application of ChatGPT in higher education and research – A futuristic analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4674364

2) Al-Khalifa, S. (2023). ChatGPT across Arabic Twitter: a study of topics, sentiments, and sarcasm. Data, 8(11), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8110171

3) Alqudah, D. (2023). Exploring the impact of virtual reality field trips on student engagement and learning outcomes. Migration Letters, 20(5), 1205-1216. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i5.4876

4) An, Y. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Design teaching model involving ChatGPT. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 24(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/24/20230560

5) Armandola, N. G., Ehlert, A., & Rauhut, H. (2022). Rebel without a cause: the effects of social origins and disposable income on rule violations. European Sociological Review, 39(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac016

6) Baek, J., Lin, S., Bolin, J., Ory, M., Flores, S., & Kash, B. (2021). Factors affecting adoption of a technology-based tool for diabetes self-management education and support among adult patients with type 2 diabetes in south Texas. The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care, 47(3), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106211004885

7) Bancoro, J.C. (2024). Relationship between artificial intelligence (ai) usage and academic performance of business administration students. PR-IJETAS, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.1.1.sc-1223-004

8) Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

9) Bodani, N. (2023). Knowledge, attitude, and practices of the general population toward utilizing ChatGPT: A cross-sectional study. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231211079

10) Bodani, N., Lal, A., Maqsood, A., Altamash, S., Ahmed, N., & Heboyan, A. (2023). Knowledge, attitude, and practices of the general population toward utilizing ChatGPT: A cross-sectional study. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231211079

11) Bonsu, E., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers' side: Determining students' perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian higher education. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2686760/v1

12) Brown, J., & Smith, L. (2021). User loyalty and subscription services: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 905-920.

13) Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

14) Cáceres-Zambrano, J. (2023). Factors associated with the adoption of technologies for avocado production systems. Agronomía Colombiana, 41(3), e110579. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v41n3.110579

15) Chandra, J. C., Irawan, I., & Irawan, H. (2023). Enhancing learning with artificial intelligence for Yadika 1 primary school teachers. ICCD, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.v5i1.667

16) Chen, Q. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: Towards the future of technology-facilitated learning. Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 32, 86-90. https://doi.org/10.54097/ah2tf031

17) Chen, W., & Roberts, J. (2021). The impact of AI-assisted learning tools on problem-solving skills among students. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 321-340.

18) Chen, X., Yang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2023). Understanding the spending habits of middle-income users: A consumer behavior study. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(2), 114-123.

19) Cheng, M. M., Lacaste, A. V., Saranza, C., & Chuang, H. H. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching in technology-supported learning environments in marine education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(24), 13922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413922

20) Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

21) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

22) Duong, C. (2024). Modeling the determinants of HEI students' continuance intention to use ChatGPT for learning: A stimulus–organism–response approach. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(2), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2024-0006

23) Etikan, I., Mukhtar, M., & Alkhateeb, A. (2016). Purposeful Sampling Technique: A Conceptual Framework. Advances in Nursing, 2016, 1-5.

24) Fu, Y. (2024). A research of the impact of ChatGPT on education. Applied and Computational Engineering, 35(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/35/20230354

25) Glahn, K. (2024). Using ChatGPT to teach English for academic purposes. JEICOM, 5(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.34097/jeicom-5-2-december-23-5

26) Golestani, M., Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., Saadati, M., Farahbakhsh, M., & Dalal, K. (2021). Lifestyle risk factor assessment through who step approach in Tabriz, Iran. Clinicoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Volume 13, 487-492. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s304189

27) Gonzalez, A., Chiu, R., & Fryer, M. (2022). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2022.024

28) Gonzalez, M., Larson, T., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Adoption of AI technologies in higher education: Usage patterns and user preferences. Journal of Technology in Education, 28(4), 542-556.

29) Gouia-Zarrad, R. (2024). Enhancing students' learning experience in mathematics class through ChatGPT. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3), em0781. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14614

30) Hasanein, A. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599-2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181

31) Hosseini, M. (2023). An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research. PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0292216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292216

32) Hu, H. (2024). Socioeconomic differences in digital inequality among Chinese older adults: Results from a nationally representative sample. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0300433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300433

33) Huang, J. (2023). Statistical analysis of factors influencing the per capita disposable income of urban residents in Anhui province. Atlantis Highlights in Computer Sciences, 743-749. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-198-2_77

34) İskender, A. (2023). Holy or unholy? Interview with OpenAI's ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research, 34, 3414. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169

35) Jepkemoi, B., Kyalo Mulwa, P., & Mwanda, S. O. (2024). Influence of ChatGPT affordances on adaptive learning experiences among undergraduate religious education teacher trainees at the University of Nairobi, Kenya. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 4(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v4i1.206

36) Johnson, A., & Kim, R. (2022). Perceived reliability of AI in academic writing: Gaps and opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 143-159.

37) Johnson, A., Lee, R., & Thomas, P. (2020). The economics of digital services: Analyzing user preferences. Journal of Digital Marketing, 15(4), 465-478.

38) Johnson, A., Smith, K., & Lee, R. (2020). The role of AI in enhancing learning and feedback in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijet.2020.015

39) Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–39). Sage.

40) Liu, Y., Liu, N., Cheng, M., Peng, X., Huang, J., Ma, J., & Wang, P. (2021). The changes in socioeconomic inequalities and inequities in health services utilization among patients with hypertension in the Pearl River Delta of China, 2015 and 2019. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10879-6

41) Maram Abdaljaleel, Muna Barakat, Mariam Alsanafi et al. (2023). Factors Influencing Attitudes of University Students towards ChatGPT and its Usage: A Multi-National Study Validating the TAME-ChatGPT Survey Instrument. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3400248/v1

42) Michel-Villarreal, R. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856

43) Murad, I., Surameery, N., & Shakor, M. (2023). Adopting ChatGPT to enhance educational experiences. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Engineering, 35, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijitc.35.20.25

44) Naidoo, Y. (2018). Comparing the implications of expanded income-based measures of living standards with an application to older Australians. Journal of Social Policy, 48(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279418000296

45) Nguyen, H., Jackson, K., & Patel, A. (2023). Enhancing educational outcomes through frequent usage of AI tools: The case of ChatGPT. Journal of Innovative Education, 49(7), 567-589.

46) Olaivar, R., Villamar, E., & Saranza, C. Enhancing Learning Continuity: A Case Study on the Effective Utilizations of eLearning to Mitigate Class Suspensions at St. Paul University-Surigao. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(4), 2410-2422. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i04-53

47) Olusola, A. (2022). Assessment of adoption rate of climate change adaptation strategies in Kishi, Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 10(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221002.11

48) Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi, F., Parpoula, C., & Karpouzis, K. (2023). Legal and ethical considerations regarding the use of ChatGPT in education. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/c5hf3

49) Patel, N., & Qureshi, S. (2023). Enhancing academic productivity through AI-assisted tools: Perspectives from users. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(1), 72-86.

50) Rababah, L. (2024). Graduate students' ChatGPT experience and perspectives during thesis writing. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 14(3), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395

51) Roberts, K., & Lee, M. (2023). Student engagement with academic technology: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(3), 515-529.

52) Sallam, M., Salim, N., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Assessing health students' attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation study. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e48254. https://doi.org/10.2196/48254

53) Samala, A. D., Zhai, X., Aoki, K., Bojic, L., & Zikic, S. (2024). An in-depth review of chatgpt's pros and cons for learning and teaching in education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 18(02), 96-117. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i02.46509

54) Sandoval, A., Pedroza-Parga, E., Yáñez-Chávez, L., Vásquez-Valle, M., & Sánchez-Cohen, I. (2023). Feasibility of the adoption of soil erosion mitigation technology on farmland and pastures in northern Mexico. Agro Productividad. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v15i12.2329

55) Sarker, D. (2023). ChatGPT's applications in higher education: Unmasking opportunities and challenges. Journal of Education Management and Development Studies, 3(4), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v3i4.250

56) Smith, H., & Doe, J. (2022). Accessing AI: A study of user behavior and preferences in AI tools. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(3), 227-245.

57) Sobaih, A. (2024). Examining students' acceptance and use of ChatGPT in Saudi Arabian higher education. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 14(3), 709-721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030047

58) Sok, S. (2024). Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for using ChatGPT in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(1), ep2401. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14027

59) Spencer, N. (2022). Access to menstrual resources as a public health issue in the US and Scotland. Open Library of Humanities, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.6342

60) Sun, D., Boudouaia, A., Zhu, C., & Li, Y. (2024). Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students' programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5

61) Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

62) Temsah, M., Aljamaan, F., Malki, K. H., Alhasan, K., Altamimi, I., Aljarbou, R., … & Al-Eyadhy, A. (2023). Chatgpt and the future of digital health: a study on healthcare workers' perceptions and expectations. Healthcare, 11(13), 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131812

63) Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

64) Tuczyńska, M., Staszewski, R., Matthews-Kozanecka, M., & Baum, E. (2022). Impact of socioeconomic status on the perception of accessibility to and quality of healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic among Poles—Pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095734

65) Ullah, A., Saqib, S., & Kächele, H. (2022). Determinants of farmers' awareness and adoption of extension recommended wheat varieties in the rainfed areas of Pakistan. Sustainability, 14(6), 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063194

66) Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M., Ali, R., & Jarrah, A. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272

67) Wassie, N. (2024). Unveiling the dynamics of women's self-help groups: Exploring socioeconomic and socio-psychological factors in Debre Birhan, Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.36923/ijsser.v6i1.244

68) Xiaoqian Li, P., Ju, P., Zhang, J., & Zhao, S. (2024). Research on the application of ChatGPT in the interdisciplinars of higher education. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice, 7(1), 40-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jaip.2024.070107

69) Xu, Z., Fang, Q., Huang, Y., & Xie, M. (2024). The public attitude towards ChatGPT on Reddit: a study based on unsupervised learning from sentiment analysis and topic modeling. Plos One, 19(5), e0302502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302502

70) Yao, R., Wen-li, Z., Evans, R., Cao, G., Rui, T., & Shen, L. (2022). Inequities in health care services caused by the adoption of digital health technologies: A scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(3), e34144. https://doi.org/10.2196/34144

71) Zawiah, M. (2023). ChatGPT and clinical training: Perception, concerns, and practice of Pharm-D students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16, 4099-4110. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s439223

72) Zekaj, R. (2023). Ai language models as educational allies: enhancing instructional support in higher education. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 22(8), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.7

73) Zhang, T., Mosier, J., & Subbian, V. (2021). Identifying barriers to and opportunities for telehealth implementation amidst the COVID-19 pandemic by using a human factors approach: a leap into the future of health care delivery. JMIR Human Factors, 8(2), e24860. https://doi.org/10.2196/24860

74) Zhou, W., Hou, J., Sun, M., & Wang, C. (2022). The impact of family socioeconomic status on elderly health in China: Based on the frailty index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020968

Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024