¹Amalia Indah Safitri, ²Sri Nur Hari Susanto

¹Master of Law Student, Diponegoro University, Semarang.
²Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-90

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

Indonesia is rich in natural resources. One of the important components on the face of the earth island, so land disputes often occur, whether between individuals, companies, or between citizens and the government. The State Administrative Court has the authority to examine and process cases related or disputes that occur between the community and the government, one of which is land disputes. The many problems related to overlapping land rights have certainly resulted in land cases handled by State Administrative Court becoming increasingly complex. State Administrative Court has absolute competence in land disputes, namely resolving disputes related to the truth of physical and legal data, including constitutive decisions. In abstracto, the problem of executing State Administrative Court decisions lies in the norms that provide regulation. This can be seen from the lack of legal certainty in Article 116 law of the State Administrative Court. In addition, the body and/or government officials are reluctant to carry it out due to self-interest responses or external factors that may occur due to intervention

KEYWORDS:

Execution, State Administrative Court Decision, Land Dispute

REFERENCES
1) Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Oleh Pemerintah / Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad (OOD) Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan”, (Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018),

2) Bunga, Marten. “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Tanah.” Gorontalo Law Review 1, Nomor 1 (2018).

3) HR, Ridwan. “Beberapa Catatan Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Forum Keadilan,

4) Kasan, Eva Fortuna dan Rasji. “Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Sengketa Pertanahan Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Nomor 188PK/TUN/2018).” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 4, Nomor 2 (2021).

5) Lotulung, Paulus Effendi. “Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan”, (Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2013) Nomor 22 (1994).

6) Pramana, I Gede Aris Eka, dkk. “Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Terkait Titik Singgung Antara Peradilan

7) Tata Usaha Negara Dan Peradilan Umum Dalam Sengketa Pertanahan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 27/G/2017/Ptun.Dps).” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, Nomor 1 (2019).

8) Rama, Yosef. “Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Atas Perkara Pertanahan Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap.” Borneo Law Review 2, Issue 2 (2018).

9) Simanjuntak, Enrico, “Esensi Sengketa Administrasi Pertanahan di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahanan 3, Nomor 2 (2017)

10) Somantri, Dikdik. “Tantangan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Memperkuat Kewibawaan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, Nomor 2 (2021).

11) Tjakranegara, R Soegijatno. “Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia.” (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002)

12) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara

13) Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang a. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara

Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024