Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
1Inez Indira Budi, 2Suraji, 3Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni
1Master of Notary Student at the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta
2,3Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-91Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
The practice of phased payment system in land transaction creates uncertainty for landowner because the land has been controlled by the buyer but the landowner has not yet received the full payment of the land. This research analyzes the legal protection for landowner due to this practice through the legal protection theory by Moch. Isnaeni. This legal research uses empirical research with a qualitative approach. The types and sources of data used are primary and secondary data. Data collection techniques used are field studies and literature studies. Data analysis techniques used is interactive analysis. The data validity technique used is the source triangulation method. The results of this research indicate that internal legal protection that can be done by landowner and buyer is by involving the role of notary in making the agreements and the inclusion of proportional clauses for both parties. While the external legal protection provided by the law is legal protection against default and legal protection against dispute resolution through litigation and non-litigation method.
KEYWORDS:Autenthic Deed, Land, Landowners, Legal Protection, Phased Payment.
REFERENCES1) Hernoko, Agus Yudha. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsional Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama.
2) Nadhifah, Raisa Berliana, & Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. (2023). “Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kerjasama Pembangunan Perumahan Oleh Pengembang Terhadap Pemilik Tanah Di Kota Padang (Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Padang Nomor 194/Pdt/2022/Pt Pdg)”. Jurnal Gorontalo Law Review. Vol. 6, No. 2.
3) Paendong, Kristiane, & Herts Taunaumang. (2022). “Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perikatan Dan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata”. Jurnal Lex Privatum. Vol. 10, No. 3.
4) Rianti, Repa, Yuni Dhea Utari, Ririn Safitri, & Nisa. (2024). “Analis Efektifitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sangketa Hukum Binis (Litigasi dan Nonlitigasi) Dalam Menjaga Kelangsungaan dan Pertumbuhan Usaha”. Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan. Vol. 3. No. 12.
5) S. Salim H. (2015). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu. Jakarta; PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
6) Saputri, Nini. (2018). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Perumahan Terhadap Promosi Yang Tidak Sesuai Dengan Yang Diperjanjikan Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen”. Jurnal JOM Fakultas Hukum. Vol. 5, No. 2.
7) Soekanto, Soerjono. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
8) Sukandar, Dadang. (2011). Membuat Surat Perjanjian. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.
9) Syajratuddar, Indah, Djumardin, & Aris Munandar. (2023). “Analisis Kasus Tentang Jual Beli Tanah Warisan Yang Belum Dibagi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Giri Menang Nomor
10) 863/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Gm)”. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan. Vol. 9, No. 16.
11) Windari, Ratna Artha. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
12) Yetti & Yalid. (2022). “Konsekuensi Hukum Pemasaran Dan Jual Beli Rumah Dalam Proses Pembangunan (Studi PT. Pratama Hutama Jaya)”. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan. Vol. 10, No. 1.
