Volume 08 Issue 01 January 2025
1Indra Jaya Rukmana, 2Bintang Roy Tambunan, 3Bina Impola Sitohang,4Dr. Darwati, S.H., M.H
1,2,3Student, Magister of Law, Borobudur University, Jakarta
4Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Borobudur University, Jakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-27Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Comparative criminal law is an attempt to compare various legal systems, whether between nations, states or religions. The aim is to find differences and similarities between the systems, by providing research-based explanations of how the law functions and how juridical problems are solved in practice. In addition, non-legal factors that may have an influence will also be examined. A deeper understanding of this can only be gained through the study of legal history, so the science of comparative law requires the analysis of legal history. The benefits of comparative law include a better understanding of legal codification at national, regional and international levels. In addition, it helps in the harmonization of laws between international conventions and national laws. Comparative law is also important for determining general principles of law, especially for judges in international courts. These principles are essential for establishi ng general principles of law which are an important source of international law. The object of legal comparison in this research is the legal system or policy in countries that have more than one legal system, in this case, Indonesia, England and the Netherlands, which is carried out by comparing laws relating to the settlement of criminal cases outside the court
KEYWORDS:Comparative, Law, Criminal
REFERENCES1) Albrecht, H. J. (2001). A Comparative Study of European Criminal Justice Systems. South African Law Commission.
2) Barda Nawawi Arief. (2015). Mediasi Penal: Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Luar Pengadilan. http:// http://bardanawawi.wordpress.com. Diakses 5 Januari 2024.
3) Brants-Langeraar, C. H. (2007). Consensual Criminal Procedures : Plea and Confession Bargaining and Abbreviated Procedures to Simplify Criminal Procedure. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law (EJCL), 11(1), 21. www.ejcl.org
4) Crijns, J. H. (2011). Witness Agreements in Dutch Criminal Law. Seminar Internasional Dan Focus Group Discussion Tentang The Protection of Whistleblowers as Justice Collaborators, 2.
5) Detlev Frehsee (Professor of Criminology and Criminal Law, University of Bielefeld, Germany). (2017). “Restitution and Offender-Victim Arrangement in German Criminal Law: Development and Theoretical Implications”.
6) Geoffrey Samuel, An Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and Method, Oregon: Hart Publising, 2014
7) Jacobs, P., & Kampen, P. van. (2014). `Dutch `ZSM Settlements` in the Face of Procedural Justice: The Sooner the Better`. Utrecht Law Review, 10(4), 75.
8) Kempen, P. H. van. (2009). The Protection of Human Rights in Criminal Law Procedure in The Netherlands. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 13(2), 12. http://www.ejcl.org
9) Krauss, R. (2012). The Theory of Prosecutorial Discretion in Federal Law: Origin and Developments. Seton Hall Circuit Review, 6(1), 2.
10) Kyprianou, D. (n.d.). Comparative Anaysis of Prosecution Systems (Part II): The Role of Prosecution Services in Investigation and Prosecution Principles and Policies. www.law.gov.cy
11) Luna, E., & Wade, M. (2010). Prosecutors as Judges. Washington and Lee Law Review, 67 (4), 1429.
12) McConville, M., Sanders, A., & Leng, R. (1996). Prosecution in Common Law Jurisdictions. Aldershot.
13) Remmelink, J. (2003). Hukum Pidana, Komentar Atas Pasal-pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padananya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum, translated Tristam Pascal Moeljono Pidana Indonesia. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
14) Summers, S. J. (2007). Fair Trials, The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and The European Court of Human Rights. Hart Publishing.
15) Tak, P. J. P. (2003). The Dutch Criminal Justice System: Organization and Operation (2nd Editio). Boom Juridische.
16) Tak, P. J. P. (2006). Methods of Diversion Used by the Prosecution Service in the Netherlands and Other Western European Countries. 135th International Senior Seminar Visiting Experts` Papers, Hosted by the United Nations Asia and Far East Institute (UNAFEI) for the Prevention of Crimes and the Treatment of Offender, 54.
17) UN Office on Drugs and Crime. (2007). Handbook of Basic Principles and Promising Practices on Alternatives to Imprisonment. UN Publication.
18) Soerjono Soekanto. (2001). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press
19) Soeroso. (2007). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika