Volume 08 Issue 01 January 2025
1Kholis Nur Hidayat, 2Zainur Rofiq
1,2Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-48Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the improvement of the learning process, competencies achieved by students, and student learning outcomes in the implementation of the Conventional Lathe Machining Technique learning process with a sample of class XI TM 4 Mechanical Engineering Department of SMK Negeri 3 Yogyakarta through the treatment of implementing the Project-Based Learning learning model. This research uses the Classroom Action Research (CAR) method. This research will be conducted in two cycles; the first cycle will include one meeting, and the second cycle will consist of two sessions to evaluate learning to determine the learning process results. The cycle of PTK stages rotates from one cycle to the next. It begins with planning (plan), action (action), observation of the action taken, and reflection (reflection). The results showed that the quality of the learning process before being given action was only 48.33% still in the “Fair” category and the learning outcomes in pre-cycle activities the average student score was 66.51 with 18.75% classical completeness which was still relatively low. After the implementation of the project-based learning model, there was an increase in cycle I where the results of the observation of the learning process with a percentage of 75% were in the “Good” category and student learning outcomes also experienced an increase in the average student score of 78.86 with 75% classical completeness. Furthermore, in the learning process of cycle II, there was an increase with a percentage of 91.66% which was included in the “Very Good” category, and at the end of cycle II, the average score increased to 86.05 with classical completeness reaching 100%. Thus, student learning outcomes in cycle II have met the indicators set in this study, namely more than 75% of the students obtained scores above the minimum score, which is ≥ 76.00.
KEYWORDS:Classroom Action Research, Learning Outcomes, and Project-Based Learning
REFERENCES1) Abdurahman, A., Sri Afira Ruhyadi, S. G., & Binasdevi, M. (2022). Implementasi Model Project Based Learning (PJBL) Dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Di Kelas Tinggi MI/SD. Al-Ibanah, 7(2), 1–9. a. https://doi.org/10.54801/ibanah.v7i2.107
2) Ansyori, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kecepatan Potong dan Makan terhadap Umur Pahat pada Pemesinan Frais Paduan Magnesium. Jurnal Mechanical, 06.(01), 28–35.
3) Arends, R, L., Wenitsky, N, E & Tannembaun, D. (2004). Emploring teaching An introduction To education. Routledge Falmer.
4) Arief, S., & Mukhayyaroh, I. A. (2018). Penerapan project based learning untuk meningkatkan kreativitas, motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 1–14.
5) AusAID. (2001). Competency based training from master trainer. West java institutional development project. Indonesia Australia Partnership for Skill Development Program.
6) Daryanto. (2009). Demonstasi sebagai Metode Belajar. Depdikbud.
7) Defianty, M., & Wilson, K. (2024). Using collaborative action research to promote critical thinking pedagogies in ELT in Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 52(5), 607–621. a. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2024.2410837
8) Peraturan Pemerintah RI No.19 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2005).
9) Djohar, A. (2017). Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. Dalam Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan. Pedagogiana Press.
10) Hanafiah & Suhana. (2009). Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. PT Refika Aditama.
11) Haryati, M. (2007). Model dan Teknik Penilaian Pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Gaung Persada Press. 12) Jakni. (2017). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Alfabeta.
12) Johannesson, P. (2022). Development of professional learning communities through action research:
13) understanding professional learning in practice. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 411–426. a. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100
14) Joyce dan Weil. (2004). Models of Teaching. A Paper Prepared for the National Council Forthe Social Studies, Boston.
15) Juliyansyah Noor. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, dan Karya Ilmiah. Prenada Media Group.
16) Kencana, P. C., & Rifa’i, R. (2021). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) dan Inkuiri di SMAN 5 Bengkulu Selatan. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.233-241
17) Kunandar. (2012). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Rajawali Press.
18) Li, D., Bliss, L., Henderson, L., Clark, P., Li, D., Bliss, L., Henderson, L., Mar, P. C., Bliss, L., Henderson, L., & Clark, P. (2024). Professional development through collaborative action research for early career academics - a collaborative auto-ethnography during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Action Research, 00(00), 1–17. a. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2024.2333911
19) Mulyasa. (2014). Pengembangan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. PT Remaja Rusdakarya Offset.
20) Prayogo, D., Hermanto, A. W., Widiatmaka, F. P., Prasetyo, D., & Sugiyarto, S. (2022). The Effect of
21) Practical Experience, Knowledge of Job Opportunities, Teacher Professionalism and Work Motivation on
22) Work Readiness. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.2062
23) Putra, E., & Indrawan, E. (2023). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Siswa SMK Negeri 1 Sumatera Barat pada Hasil Belajar Pemesinan Bubut. 5(1), 38–43.
24) Rahmat, M. H., Syaad, P., & Soenar, S. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Awal
25) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Teknik Permesinan Frais Siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori , Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 1(5), 785–795. https://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/6257
26) Ritonga, A. K. (2022). Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Karir Guru di bidang Pendidikan Kejuruan. 6(2), 3973–3982.
27) Rizkiana, I., Nugraha, R., Supriadi, U., & Iman, M. (2023). Efektivitas Strategi Pembelajaran Project Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa. 17(1), 39–47.
28) Romiyadi dan Azriadi, E. (2014). Pengaruh Kemiringan Spindel dan Kecepatan Pemakanan terhadap Getaran Mesin Frais Universal Knuth UFM 2. Jurnal Teknobiologi, 1., 31–36.
29) Roseno & Wibowo. (2019). Efisiensi Eksternal Pendidikan Kejuruan di Kota Yogyakarta. 7(1), 15–24.
30) Sudjimat, D. A. (2014). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Kejuruan. Universitas Negeri Malang.
31) Sugiri, et al. (2011). Melakukan Pekerjaan dengan Mesin Frais (Dasar). PT. Pustaka Insan Madani.
32) Sumbodo, W. et al. (2008). Teknik Produksi Mesin Industri Jilid 2. Direktorat pembinaan sekolah menegah kejuruan.
33) Suprijono. (2009). Cooperative Learning. Pustaka Pelajar.