Volume 08 Issue 01 January 2025
1Jeremy Zefanya Yaka Arvante, 2Fifiana Wisnaeni
1,2Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-50Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The rule of law (rechtstaat) and the power state (machtstaat) are two different things where Indonesia is one of the countries that has a rule of law pattern which means basing its national and state life on laws based on Pancasila democracy. However, the problem occurs when the Job Creation Law which is now Law No. 6 of 2023 tends to oppress people’s rights by encouraging investors to obtain land more easily. This is shown by the revocation of the PPLH Law and the enactment of the Ciptaker Law, and this is identical to the authoritarian political configuration pattern that emphasizes the dominance of power and is repressive. The results of this study are that there must be control over the government system based on the values of Pancasila and democracy so that the regulations formed do not produce authoritarian political configuration products; then in practical terms, it is necessary to conduct a study of the costs and benefits of each regulation that will be made which is included in the academic paper, so that it is clear which parties benefit from the implementation of the regulation. In the context of environmental protection which is also based on Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, the Job Creation Law which changes the provisions of the Environmental Management Law must be revised and reconsidered, especially in terms of licensing and the preparation of environmental impact analysis (EIA) which involves the community.
KEYWORDS:Legal State, Power State, Job Creation Law, Authoritarian Political Configuration
REFERENCES1) Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2011. “Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Pertama, Cet.” VII, Kencana Prenada (Jakarta, Media Group, 2011) 137.
2) Metro TV, Admin. 2024. “Sepanjang 2024, Jumlah Pekerja Kena PHK Tembus 45 Ribu Orang.” 1.
3) Nonet, Philippe, Philip Selznick, and Robert A. Kagan. 2017. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Routledge.
4) Perbawa, I. Ketut Sukawati Lanang Putra. 2022. “Konsep Dan Indikator Tentang Politik Dan Hukum (Konfigurasi Politik Dan Otoriter) Tipe Hukum Represif, Otonom Dan Responsif.” Jurnal Yusthima 2(1):5.
5) Qamar, Nurul, Kaharuddin Syah Y. Dt Amas, Rusli Dg Palabbi, Andi Suherman, and Farah Syah Rezah. 2018. Negara Hukum Atau Negara Kekuasaan (Rechtsstaat or Machtstaat). CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
6) Rahman, Abdul. 2022. “Ekonomi, Hukum Dan Lingkungan Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Lex Renaissance 7(2):314.
7) Sari, Gholin Noor Aulia, Hanum Sekarwangi, and Ruly Bella Puspaningtyas. 2023. “POLEMIK UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA BAGI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP.” YUSTISI 10(2):223.
8) Sukarno Aburaera, Dkk, S. H. Muhadar, M. H. Maskun, and L. L. M. SH. 2014. “Filsafat Hukum: Teori Dan Praktik.” 106–8.
9) Suteki, Galang Taufani, and G. Taufani. 2018. “Metode Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori Dan Praktik).” Jakarta: Rajawali Pers 132.
10) Wulandari, Cahya. 2020. “Kedudukan Moralitas Dalam Ilmu Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 8(1):1.