Volume 08 Issue 01 January 2025
1Lita Tyesta Addy Listya Wardhani, 2Amalia Diamantina, 3Luthfi Hafidz Rafsanjani
1,2,3Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-55Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Indonesia, as a megadiverse country, carries a significant responsibility to ensure the sustainability of biodiversity conservation. This conservation effort requires strategic regulation and adaptive governance within the context of local government administration. This study aims to explore the theoretical concepts and policy frameworks for implementing biodiversity conservation in the context of sustainable development, and to examine the strategies for regulating and governing biodiversity conservation at the regional level. The research employs a normative juridical method with a legislative, analytical, and conceptual approach. Data for this study is sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including laws and regulations, expert doctrines, and supporting literature, to analyze biodiversity conservation regulation within local governance.The study finds that biodiversity conservation at the regional level requires the integration of sustainability principles into local government planning and program implementation. Key challenges identified include a lack of synergy among relevant authorities, limited local government capacity, and low participation from local communities. These issues need to be continually evaluated and analyzed to map out the appropriate policy solutions for effective governance of biodiversity conservation, particularly at the regional level. The study recommends strategic approaches such as strengthening an inclusive policy framework, establishing collaborative mechanisms between the government and local communities, and developing programs based on local needs and regional potential. Furthermore, the research suggests the development of data-driven policies to support sustainable biodiversity conservation governance at the regional level. This will ensure that conservation efforts become an integral part of effective local government administration, aligned with the needs of sustainable development.
KEYWORDS:Biodiversity Conservation, Governance, Local Government, Regulatory Strategies.
REFERENCES1) Angelsen, A. et al. (2018). Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. In Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. Center for International Forestry Research. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007045
2) Asril, M. et al. (2022). Keanerkaragaman Hayati. In Jakarta: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
3) Bank, T. W. (2018). Environmental & Social Framework for IPF Operations ESS6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources. World Bank Group.
4) Bauwens, M. (2005). The Eco-Philosophy of Henryk Skolimowski. In Foundation for Peer to Peer. Alternatives Newsletter.
5) Faiz, P. M. (2016). Perlindungan terhadap Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(4), 766. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1344
6) Ismail, N. (2018). Hukum Agraria dalam Tantangan Perubahan. Setara Press.
7) Jadda, A. A. T. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Lingkungan Terhadap Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Keanekaragaman Hayati. Madani Legal Review, 3(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.31850/malrev.v3i1.344
8) Klemm, C. de. (1993). Biological Diversity Conservation and the Law: Legal Mechanisms for Conserving Species and Ecosystems. In IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 29 (Vol. 29). The International Union for Conservation of Nature.
9) Krauss, J. E. (2022). Unpacking SDG 15, its targets and indicators: tracing ideas of conservation. Globalizations, 19(8), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2035480
10) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 2024 on Amendments to Law Number 5 of 1990 Concerning the Conservation of Biological Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems (2024).
11) Maydrawati, T. R. (2016). Tinjauan Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijakannya terhadap Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Keanekaragaman Hayati. Perspektif Hukum, 16(1), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v16i1.41
12) Murwaji, T. (2004). Dampak Otonomi Daerah terhadap Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi. Lokakarya Nasional Penyusunan Peta Permasalahan Taman Nasional Kutai Kalimantan Timur.
13) Nash, R. F. (1989). The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics.
14) Opoku, A. (2019). Biodiversity and the built environment: Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141(October 2017), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011
15) Pearce, D. (2002). Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation. In Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264175792-en
16) Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
17) Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. In The President and Fellows of Harvard College (Revision). Harvard University Press.
18) Simarmata, J. (2018). Tumpang Tindih Undang-Undang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(3), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i3.245
19) Supariadi. (2008). Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia: Sebuah Pengantar.
20) The Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 2023 on The Integration of Biodiversity Conservation into Sustainable Development (2023). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/240602/inpres-no-1-tahun-2023
21) Wahab, S. A. et al. (2000). Masa Depan Otonomi Daerah: Kajian Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Politin untuk Menciptakan Sinergi dalam Pembangunan Daerah. Penerbit SIC.
22) Wahanisa, R., & Mahfud, M. A. (2021). Tinjauan Pengaturan Hukum Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dalam Berbagai Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. In Jurnal Konstitusi (Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 391–412). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1826
23) Zafra-Calvo, N. et al. (2017). Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas. Biological Conservation, 211(May), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.014