¹Millandini Devira Kumororatri, ²I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, ³Bambang Manumayoso

¹Master of Notary Student at the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta
^2,3Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i1-81

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The establishment of the UUPA as the basis for land tenure in Indonesia requires all former western land rights to be converted in accordance with the land rights contained in the UUPA. PT KAI has land assets based on Grondkaart as a legacy of the railroad company during the Dutch colonial era. This has led to conflicts that continue to occur between PT KAI and the community to this day, because many of PT KAI's land assets have not yet been titled. This triggers people who use land on land owned by PT KAI to register the rights to the land they have used for years. However, the land used by the community is not free state land. Rather, it is state land that is a separated state asset, so that even though PT KAI land is no longer used for railroad activities, the land is still a state right. Some conflicts that occur between PT KAI and the community are caused by the absence of certainty of land rights, therefore this research will discuss the legal force of Grondkaart and solutions related to problems that arise related to the Grondkaart problem. The results show that although PT KAI's land is still not titled, the Grondkaart which is proof of PT KAI's land tenure can be perfect proof of land tenure. Legal certainty over the use of land by the community on PT KAI land is one of the keys to resolving conflicts with a win-win solution, namely by leasing land between the community and PT KAI. Regarding the desire of some people who want ownership rights, this may be done through the approval of the finance minister.

KEYWORDS:

Certificate; Grondkaart; Legal Certainty; PT. KAI; UUPA.

REFERENCES
1) CNN Indonesia Team. 2022. 135 Juta Meter Persegi Lahan KAI Belum Bersertifikat. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20221028105342-92-866494/135-juta-meter-persegi-lahan-kai-belum-bersertifikat.

2) Harsono, Budi. 1999. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi Dan Pelaksanannya. Jakarta: Djembatan

3) Karunnyabuddhi, Adyana. 2024. Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan 56 Sertipikat HM di Kelurahan Tanjung Mas Semarang. Notarious Jorunal Diponegoro University, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 292-310, Apr.

4) Mansyukur, Hamidi. 2022. Sejarah Pengaturan Tanah Dalam Grondkaart Di Indonesia, ed. Dr. Harto Juwono M.Hum. Yogyakarta: Buku Litera.

5) Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2007. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group

6) Nugroho, Septian Ikhwan, Isnaeni, Diyan & M.Muhibbin. 2021. Akibat Hukum Tanah Grondkaart yang Dikuasai PT.Kereta Api Indonesia Setelah Berlakunya UUPA Nomor 5 Tahun 1960. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Dinamika, 27(7),

7) Pahlevi, Farida Sekti. 2022. “Kekuatan Hukum GRONDKAART Dan Problematikanya Di Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 1 (June 23, 2022)

8) Rajab, Rezeki Aldila, Bambang Eko Turisno, and Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. 2020.Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah. Notarius. Vol 13.

9) Subair, Laola. 2021. Eksistensi Hak Penguasaan Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Journal of Legal Science 1, no. 1 (August 2021)

10) Tim Telaga Bakti Nusantara. 1977. Sejarah Perkeretaapian Indonesia, Jilid1 ed.. Bandung: Angkasa

11) Zefanya, Audry, FX Arsin Lukman. 2022. Tolak Ukur Pemenuhan Penguasaan Fisik Atas Tanah Melalui Surat Pernyataan Penguasaan Fisik Bidang Tanah, Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 2

Volume 08 Issue 01 January 2025