Volume 08 Issue 02 February 2025
1Elisabeth Sihaloho, 2Fifiana Wisnaeni
1Magister of Law, Diponegoro University
2Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i2-47Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The existence of the Constitutional Court as stated in the provisions of Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution has established the dignity of the Constitutional Court's position as a Guardian of the Constitution which is understood as a judicial institution that protects the constitutional rights of Indonesia citizens. This research is aimed at solving the problem of the constitutional rights of Indonesia citizens who are often injured through legal products in the form of laws. Therefore, this study focuses on studying, analyzing and comparing how the context of judicial preview or can be understood as a test of a draft law both formally and materially as a form of preventive protection of citizen’s constitutional rights. The writing of this journal is a normative juridical research based on a literature study by examining and understanding the basic mechanism regarding the provisions for testing laws in positive law in Indonesia accompanied by the act of analyzing the process of implementing judicial preview (testing of draft laws) carried out by the Chilli Constitutional Court. The final result of writing this journal is in the form of a prospective study of the expansion of the authority of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia in conducting a judicial preview (testing of draft laws) which can later be expected to be adopted in positive legal provisions.
KEYWORDS:Constitutional Court of Indonesia, Constitutional Court of Chile, Testing of Laws, Testing of Draft Laws, Protection of Constitutional Rights
REFERENCES1) Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Gagasan Dasar tentang Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2012.
2) Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
3) Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Model-model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi press, 2005.
4) Fajarwati, Meirin. "Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Program Legislasi Nasional." Jurnal Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, 2017: 7.
5) Fatmawati. Struktur dan Fungsi Legislasi. Jakarta: UI Press, 2010.
6) Gaffar, Afan. Politik Indonesia : Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
7) Galih, Lintang. "Kewenangan Uji Material Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi." Jurnal Sains Universitas Pattimura Vol. 26 No. 4, Desember 2020 17, 2020: 514-526.
8) Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.
9) Konstitusi, Mahkamah. Tranformasi Digital Pengegakkan Konstitusi. Catatan Tahunan, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2020.
10) Lindsay, Khaterine. Federan Constitutional. Canberra: Law Book co, 2003.
11) M.Hadjon, Philipus. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 2007.
12) Machiavelli, Niccolo. II Principle. italia: Antonia Blado, 1532.
13) Mangkudilaga, Benjamin. Jalan Tengah Pengujian Peraturan Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Kompas, 2002.
14) MKRI, Setjen dan kepaniteraan. Naskah Komperhensif Perubahan UUD 1945 Buku VI. Jakarta: Setjen dan Kepaniteraan MKRI, 2010.
15) Marzuki, Prof.Laica. "Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi." Jurnal Artikel ilmiah, 2010: 3.
16) Nugroho, Sapto. Harmonisasi Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Humas , 2009.
17) Rahadrjo, Satjipto. ilmu hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya, 2012.
18) Sidaharta, Arief. Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Remaja Karya, 1989.
19) Soemantri, Sri. Prosedur dan Perubahan Konstitusi. Bandung: Alumni, 1987.
20) Stone, Alec. Governing with judges : constitutional politics. New york: Oxford University Pers, 2000.
21) Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta, 2016.
22) Suteki, and Galang Taufani. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat,Teori dan Praktik). Depok: PT. Raa Grafindo Persada, 2020.